Briles
Well-Known Member
It hit the underside of his arm and his armpit. Im not going to keep explaining it to you.
Link doesn't work.
I've posted the view from behind earlier in the thread which shows it hitting his upper arm. You're literally contradicting yourself, earlier in the thread you said it hit his armpit which, by current definition, is NOT handball.
It hit the underside of his arm and his armpit. Im not going to keep explaining it to you.
As much as I hate to say it I can see why the ref reached the decision he did and also why not enough proof to overturn the ref's decision.
A shame but it gives someone a real chance to step up be it Rose or Pask.
Rose would be my default but also think Pask has performed well and has perhaps been dealt a bit of a shitty hand - wouldn't begrudge him the chance to start in the back three if he was picked ahead of Rose.
Is Rose injured again? Noticed he wasn't on the bench Tuesday
Didn’t Dublin have a groin problem tooYes, slight groin problem. Robins says he's available for tomorrow though.
Didn’t Dublin have a groin problem too
Looking at that video I’m even more convinced it sholdn’tt have been a pen
Looks pretty clear from this that it hits upper arm/shirt sleeve so, by the new rule NOT handball.
Not sure. He’s never been in the airToo small and do we even know if he is any good in the air?
It was overturned because growling at an opponent is not a red card offenceThey won't normally overturn a referee's decision unless it is something like mistaken identity. Especially when a penalty is involved and/or the result is affected.
Out of interest does anyone know why Rotherham's Smith sending off was overturned?
If the sending off had cost Rotherham points the decision to overturn it would have been much more difficult.
Good job he doesn't play for Wolves then. Next thing might have been a nasty biteIt was overturned because growling at an opponent is not a red card offence
I see exactly the opposite. Don’t want to beat up the ref though. If we’re split with all the screenshots and videos either way it was a very close decisionThe slow mo from behind the goal looks like the correct decision to me. Fair play to the ref, he got it right.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Even more baffled now...
For anyone who didn't see it, Mowatt was sent off for a blatant 2 footed challenge, lunging in with both feet off the ground. The referee, 2 yards away instantly dismisses him.
Contact with the opponent is clearly exaggerated & yes, some years ago it's probably not even a foul blah, blah but by the letter of the law it's clear that it could "endanger an opponent" i.e. Serious Foul Play & so a red card is perfectly justified.
Different rules for teams near the top???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?