The good progress is for a 20 year old to be getting games in the top flight of Portuguese football. To be considered good enough to get games while on loan, and possibly playing in games against teams like Porto and Benfica is some achievement. As a 19 and 20 year old, Callum Wilson scored just 2 in 20 loan appearances for non-league Kettering and Tamworth. That is not unusual for a talented young striker early in their career. Even an exceptionally talented striker like Tammy Abraham scored just 5 in 31 appearances on loan to Swansea as a 19 and 20 year old. There is no real evidence yet that we are interested in Dadashov. But someone good enough to play 15 times for Germany U-17s and score 13 goals must have potential to do well in the Championship. We'd be mugs not to welcome a player like that if MR thinks he's good enough.not sure I would call 7 games no goals good progress,do we see him ahead of what we already have though ? That’s if there even any truth in this I doubt there is.To the question of how much better can we realistically get ? What than a 21 year old loan with no experience in England ? Really ?
Yes fair post there mateThe good progress is for a 20 year old to be getting games in the top flight of Portuguese football. To be considered good enough to get games while on loan, and possibly playing in games against teams like Porto and Benfica is some achievement. As a 19 and 20 year old, Callum Wilson scored just 2 in 20 loan appearances for non-league Kettering and Tamworth. That is not unusual for a talented young striker early in their career. Even an exceptionally talented striker like Tammy Abraham scored just 5 in 31 appearances on loan to Swansea as a 19 and 20 year old. There is no real evidence yet that we are interested in Dadashov. But someone good enough to play 15 times for Germany U-17s and score 13 goals must have potential to do well in the Championship. We'd be mugs not to welcome a player like that if MR thinks he's good enough.
We should sign them both up!
So now we’re signing Football Manager regens?
Took me a while to get on the O’Hare bandwagon mate I’m not fussed if we don’t sign him either he wasn’t a starter for us more impact player,plenty of potential etc which doesn’t mean much either but would be a welcomed addition if he did come,I have a feeling he will go elsewhere following the money.
As a former director of said company I agree with youHP for me every time... None of that 'own brand' rubbish!
So you don't believe there is a single player out there that is better than ohare?Not fussed if we sign him , please tell me who you think we will get, or you would prefer us to get instead of O'hare who is better in your opinion? You quite rightly say he was an impact player more than a starter, but boy did he have an impact, scored some crucial goals, added flair and creativity at times when we lacked it and is only going to get better and the fact he made such an impact shows how important he was. I personally would be absolutely over the moon if we sign him.
I'm sure there is. Never said there isn't.No idea who. And whether we could get them. I would personally love to see us sign him. If not it will be a shame as I think he is a quality player but I 100% trust we will have other options.So you don't believe there is a single player out there that is better than ohare?
But you are putting your faith in an unproven player in the championship. Yes he was good this year but how do we know he will step up. I wouldn't be paying a fortune in wages to find out if someone who is proven is better value.I'm sure there is. Never said there isn't.No idea who. And whether we could get them. I would personally love to see us sign him. If not it will be a shame as I think he is a quality player but I 100% trust we will have other options.
We didn't sign Bright and we got O'hare if we don't get O'hare there will be someone else.
I only want him if he wants to sign, I have full faith in Robins and Badlan I just dont think we should understate the quality O'hare has and showed during the season. Won't be easy finding someone better.
Saw them play Porto few weeks back. They looked a decent team. Didn't look out for him UnforuntleyIn the current season he has been on loan to a Portuguese first division side Pacos de Ferreira where he has made seven appearances. No goals but for a 20 year old player (Was 21 in May) that is good progress. How much better do we need? How much better can we realistically get?
He wasn’t a starter in league 1 he probably wants assurances he will be starting I doubt he would make the first 11 on opening day but i could be wrong,O’Hare is decent great potential but he’s not irreplaceable mate if he signs great if he don’t we move on.Not fussed if we sign him , please tell me who you think we will get, or you would prefer us to get instead of O'hare who is better in your opinion? You quite rightly say he was an impact player more than a starter, but boy did he have an impact, scored some crucial goals, added flair and creativity at times when we lacked it and is only going to get better and the fact he made such an impact shows how important he was. I personally would be absolutely over the moon if we sign him.
So now we’re signing Football Manager regens?
But you are putting your faith in an unproven player in the championship. Yes he was good this year but how do we know he will step up. I wouldn't be paying a fortune in wages to find out if someone who is proven is better value.
He wasn’t a starter in league 1 he probably wants assurances he will be starting I doubt he would make the first 11 on opening day but i could be wrong,O’Hare is decent great potential but he’s not irreplaceable mate if he signs great if he don’t we move on.
Robins left him out a lot last season used an impact sub so the manager must of thought we had better last season at league 1 level never mind the championship.
Personally I think the move for O’Hare is probably off I think it would of been done by now players been released and we had him last season.
Agree completely that the longer it goes on as always is the case it becomes less likely. Our recruitment will have planned for the chance that he wouldn't sign and if he doesn't good luck to him.
What O'hare had was the ability to change a game. Often I felt we played Westbrooke and Shipley as starters as I don't think either of them would have that ame explosive impact that O'hare showed.
Will be interesting to see who we sign for that position be it Ohare or not.
Only 1 startnot sure I would call 7 games no goals good progress,do we see him ahead of what we already have though ? That’s if there even any truth in this I doubt there is.To the question of how much better can we realistically get ? What than a 21 year old loan with no experience in England ? Really ?
Not fussed if we sign him , please tell me who you think we will get, or you would prefer us to get instead of O'hare who is better in your opinion? You quite rightly say he was an impact player more than a starter, but boy did he have an impact, scored some crucial goals, added flair and creativity at times when we lacked it and is only going to get better and the fact he made such an impact shows how important he was. I personally would be absolutely over the moon if we sign him.
Didn’t fancy him personally not fussedInterest ended
Coventry City end interest in young Wolves star
The Sky Blues' busy summer of transfer activity continues.www.coventrytelegraph.net
They probably wanted him to be guaranteed to be playingSounds like it was the club rather than the player. Wonder whether we wanted the option to buy at the end of the loan possibly.
He's gone on loan to Grasshopper Zurich in the Swiss second division.
Wow, Grasshopper are in second division now?
Wonder how high he can jumpI was surprised too. Looks like they've had a ropey couple of years.
I was surprised too. Looks like they've had a ropey couple of years.
A plague on them......................Concentrating on their cricket team now.
I guess they had the patience to see the deal through
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?