I know this is an on-going debate but couldn't this have been put in one of the many other threads currently going?
And this will do exactly the same.
I used to really like Hot Shot Hamish when i was a kid.
And me to be honest.
However stop side tracking the thread.
Do you think the quickest way this would get sorted is if SISU now compromised.
Nice to know SISU can always call on your expertise Dongonzalos?
If they did Paxman
The deal would've done tonight.
I would have a 5 year incentivised contract drawn up
Every year SISU achieve certain mutually agreed objectives.
They het the option to buy a percentage if the stadium at a discounted price.
Each year they do this the rent comes down.
Of course it would be the quickest. Would it be the best? Have to see and judge after the event.
Thank god your not negotiating then. To even suggest a private organisation has to meet objectives agreed with the buffoons at the council is just laughable.
400k per season, plus a cut of food, drink and car parking sales for a stadium that we dont even own whilst Palace are paying 280k for a shithole like Selhurst Park? Accept the bloody deal SISU and focus on transfers and the future of the club. If you're not happy with the deal, renegotiate it at a later date, but secure the future of club now
400k per season, plus a cut of food, drink and car parking sales for a stadium that we dont even own whilst Palace are paying 280k for a shithole like Selhurst Park? Accept the bloody deal SISU and focus on transfers and the future of the club. If you're not happy with the deal, renegotiate it at a later date, but secure the future of club now
400k per season, plus a cut of food, drink and car parking sales for a stadium that we dont even own whilst Palace are paying 280k for a shithole like Selhurst Park? Accept the bloody deal SISU and focus on transfers and the future of the club. If you're not happy with the deal, renegotiate it at a later date, but secure the future of club now
Ah, but it's not £400k/yr. That figure came from ACL but they forgot to mention all the extras adding up to another £400k/yr.
That's £800k/yr and when you consider our total income is down to about £5mio/yr it really does matter if the rent is £400k or £800k.
It is £400k for the rent which is paid to ACL. The match day costs £240K would be there anyway whether the club own or rent the ground (including the directors bar bill which is included in match day costs but also (but not only) the costs of supplying staffing to the corporate & posh seats that CCFC sell on) The £160k is the rates and that is paid to the Council like any other business not to ACL, as such is not part of any deal to be struck with ACL.
you have to question what is said on both sides ...... not just accept things
400k per season, plus a cut of food, drink and car parking sales for a stadium that we dont even own whilst Palace are paying 280k for a shithole like Selhurst Park? Accept the bloody deal SISU and focus on transfers and the future of the club. If you're not happy with the deal, renegotiate it at a later date, but secure the future of club now
Yes, but are the 'extras' not included in the current £1.28m/yr?
(I have asked if anybody know this a couple of times, but no reply so far).
And pay back £1 million? I don't think so.
"Focus on transfers and the future of the club", you say? Yet yesterday you were moaning and digging at SISU as they only sign players on free transfers. You can't have it all ways. If we have to pay a high rent then less money will be available for the squad. So which do you want?
Why would they agree to something they are not happy with?
And you do realise that Selhurst Park is in London don't you? You would expect London rent rates to be at least double a rate in Coventry. It is not much smaller than the Ricoh either at about 26k.
"Focus on transfers and the future of the club", you say? Yet yesterday you were moaning and digging at SISU as they only sign players on free transfers. You can't have it all ways. If we have to pay a high rent then less money will be available for the squad. So which do you want?
Ah, but it's not £400k/yr. That figure came from ACL but they forgot to mention all the extras adding up to another £400k/yr.
That's £800k/yr and when you consider our total income is down to about £5mio/yr it really does matter if the rent is £400k or £800k.
All i can tell you is that in the published accounts there is over £995k in direct costs which have the following explanation
"Direct operating costs include match expenses and the direct costs relating to playing activities"
I assume, and it is only an assumption but i think reasonable, that the match day expenses charged by ACL or the compass joint venture are included in that. That £995k is certainly not the rent
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?