Reply from football league (1 Viewer)

Cigarfingers

Well-Known Member
Sorry if this has already been posted, I did have a quick look but couldn't see it anywhere.

This morning I had a reply from league to the email I sent re selling club and moving etc.

Reply as follows:

Andy,

Thank you for your email and the points you raise. We have received numerous emails and telephone calls from Coventry City fans concerned at the on-going situation at the club. We can assure you that your email has been read but given the volume of emails, we cannot always provide an individual response.

As background, it is worth clarifying the administration process and explaining the role of The Football League. The administrator is an officer of the High Court and owes duties to both the Court and creditors. It is the administrator that controls whatever assets an insolvent company holds and he has to determine the sale process in accordance with principles of Insolvency Law. The League plays no part in this and ultimately has to try and work with the administrator's nominated purchaser. The Football League's role is to administer and regulate the competition that it's members play in and only has the power to do so within its regulations. These are available to view on our website here: http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/RegulationsIndex/0,,10794,00.html.

The administrator sold the assets under his control to Otium Entertainment Group and The League currently remains in discussions with Otium and the administrator to determine whether the Club can exit from administration in accordance with our Insolvency Policy.

For information, details of our Owners and Directors Test can also be found here: http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/FAQ/FAQsDetail/0,,10794~2428071,00.html.

Each Football Club is a business in its own right and The Football League has no direct influence with regards to negotiations over lease agreements, stadium ownership etc. We regulate the competition that our clubs play in and ultimately aim to ensure that they all retain their membership of The League within the competition structure.

The club's owners have for some time been in dispute with the owners of the Ricoh Arena - Arena Coventry Limited (ACL) with regards to the playing of matches at the Ricoh Arena. It is The League's Board's view that it is a matter of regret that to date it has not proved possible for both parties to reconcile their differences. Otium made a request to the Board of Directors of The Football League to play it's home matches at Northampton Town's Sixfields Stadium.

In considering this request The League has stated that it believes that clubs should play in towns and cities from which they take their name. Nonetheless, from time to time, the Board is asked to consider temporary relocations as a means of securing a club's on-going participation in our competition. With no prospect of an agreement being reached between Otium and ACL, the Board was placed in an invidious position - with the very real possibility of Coventry City being unable to fulfil its fixtures for next season. This would inevitably call into question the club's continued membership of The Football League.

With the new season less than four weeks away, the Board required certainty as to where the Club would play its matches from the start of the new campaign. Reluctantly, the Board of Directors of The Football League has approved the application to relocate on a temporary basis only. The League has set out certain requirements of this consent in order to ensure the best outcome possible for the football club. Otium must provide a Performance Bond of £1m with The Football League as an assurance of the club's commitment to return to the Coventry area. In addition, the Board's approval remains entirely conditional on the Club ultimately exiting administration in accordance with The Football League's conditions and achieving a successful transfer of its League share.

The League continues to urge both Otium and ACL to continue to explore every possible opportunity to resolve this dispute, for the good of the City of Coventry, its football club and people living in the local community.

Thank you again for contacting The Football League.

Kind Regards

Amanda

Amanda Craig
Customer Services Administrator
The Football League Limited
 

luwalla

Well-Known Member
loads of crap.. they are not interested.. save your time emailing them.. if they hadn't let the club register players to a totally diffrent company to the one which held the right to play in the league... or paid league money to a different company to the one they had registered as the holder of the golden share.. then we might not be in a mess

the league need to sort their own house out, never mind anyone elses.. they know they nave messed up here, and they cant wait for this to all go away so they can brush their part in it, under the carpet

and who do they have to answer to .. no one! tossers
 

Shooting2win

New Member
I got the same arse-covering bullshit. We've got to make them aware of this apparent Hoffman deal and show them that Fisher isn't willing to 'explore every possible opportunity to resolve this dispute, for the good of the City of Coventry, its football club and people living in the local community.' and thinking only of SISU's ultimate gain in all of this.

Got to keep up the pressure on the football league because they're losing even more credibility the longer this nightmare continues.
 

SkyBlue76

New Member
What I don't understand is their statement saying that the Administrator has sold the assets to Otium - I thought that was still subject to the CVA and hence the sale has not actually concluded. Am I wrong?

If the sale has not happened, why are the Football League agreeing to anything that Otium have proposed? I can accept an agreement 'in principle' but this should only be made behind closed doors, not in the public.
 

dadgad

Well-Known Member
Good, keep the pressure on them.
All they have is flannel and BS to cover for their lack of power and scruples.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The administrator is an officer of the High Court and owes duties to both the Court and creditors. It is the administrator that controls whatever assets an insolvent company holds and he has to determine the sale process in accordance with principles of Insolvency Law. The League plays no part in this and ultimately has to try and work with the administrator's nominated purchaser.

How does this then tally with the Pompey administration where they had other potential owners promising a better return to creditors but the FL kept public stating they would only issue the Golden Share to the PST. Why can they get involved in the administration process for Pompey but not for us?
 

I'mARealWizard

New Member
The very fact that they even have a template to reply to cov fans is indicative of the volume and attention that is being drawn to the FL.
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
loads of crap.. they are not interested.. save your time emailing them.. if they hadn't let the club register players to a totally diffrent company to the one which held the right to play in the league... or paid league money to a different company to the one they had registered as the holder of the golden share.. then we might not be in a mess

the league need to sort their own house out, never mind anyone elses.. they know they nave messed up here, and they cant wait for this to all go away so they can brush their part in it, under the carpet

and who do they have to answer to .. no one! tossers

Agreed - their incompetence has let SISU grab them by the nuts.
 

blend

New Member
I had same reply as well, it seems astounding to me that their 'insolvency policy' is not a public document. I guess it must go something like this....

1) If any of the rules of the Football League come into conflict with owners with necessary legal clout to see us off, then those said rules no longer apply.
2) This is not a public document, under no circumstances should this be shown to any fans, government officials or Panorama investigators.
 

Steve1974

New Member
My reply email was word for word the same. So what's the point? They ain't gonna read all the emails sent.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top