he is opposing the council on the green belt have yet ever spoken to him?
indemnity
/ɪnˈdɛmnɪti/
noun
- security or protection against a loss or other financial burden
- security against or exemption from legal liability for one's actions
- a sum of money paid as compensation, especially one paid by a country defeated in war as a condition of peace
Pick your definition. The middle one is interesting.
B U S T E D
indemnity
/ɪnˈdɛmnɪti/
noun
- security or protection against a loss or other financial burden
- security against or exemption from legal liability for one's actions
- a sum of money paid as compensation, especially one paid by a country defeated in war as a condition of peace
Pick your definition. The middle one is interesting.
The third party will be IEC Experience
There's a Christopher West that's a former director of IEC. Same Chris West that was at the council? Appreciate it's a common name.
There's a Christopher West that's a former director of IEC. Same Chris West that was at the council? Appreciate it's a common name.
I thought a new company was being established for the hotel development. WPS Trading Limited made the planning app: Coventry City Council: Planning Application DetailsIf Pete and mark want to take up the mantle just ask on the radio tomorrow is IEC the third party? It’s the catering arm and it’s also the company I think that is looking at developing car park C - I’m not sure on that but it ain’t wasps holdings - this company is fully controlled by Derek Richardson who oddly fully controls wasps holdings. Perhaps Gilbert Upton et al should get the organ grinder on or not bother with nonsense if he said he said
is this just going to be a word play where it is an indemnity but Wasps have had their thesaurus out to find a different word for the sake of the negotiations?
How on earth could anybody justify a private company introducing an indemnity for a local authority into negotiations with another private company? And who in their right mind would agree to indemnify a local authority against which they had raised a complaint? No wonder wasps insisted on an NDA and won’t agree to a member of the public’s request to waive it?
Because wasps wouldn’t drop the indemnity before time ran out.If talks failed due to the indemnity why did Boddy say it was because wasps timed them out? Is this all consistent? Could they have been trying to come up with some kind of work around which wasps then stalled on?
Gilbert seems to be doing alright on this tbf.
Would there have been any expectation that the indemnity would be dropped? Does add up though as Boddy also said “same issues as last year”Because wasps wouldn’t drop the indemnity before time ran out.
Would there have been any expectation that the indemnity would be dropped? Does add up though as Boddy also said “same issues as last year”
Gets people onside for another season in Brum, even if no hope and same issues. It played well last year, so why not use it again? No lose in that respect - get a deal, great and if you don't, here we areif there had been no hope there would have been little point in opening negotiations. Perhaps there was hope that Andy Street could have had some influence in that regard.
I thought a new company was being established for the hotel development. WPS Trading Limited made the planning app: Coventry City Council: Planning Application Details
Company registered in 2016:
Nature of business (SIC)
68100 - Buying and selling of own real estate
Maybe they don’t but whatever is in the indemnity implicitly protects them while they can conveniently deny being involved with it?Fucking hell. All coming out now isn't it?
Makes you wonder, why are Wasps so desperate to protect CCC?
Maybe they don’t but whatever is in the indemnity implicitly protects them while they can conveniently deny being involved with it?
We need answers from the council.
Good luck with that one.
I'll chain myself to the railings and go on hunger strike...until I have to go work Monday anyway
How many times have I said that the council are hiding behind Wasps and using them as a puppet....
If he's involved no wonder the talks failed!
Not really, just means he isn't an independent mediator.
What happened to that guy who sorted it last time?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?