Dear Councillor Mutton,
I write to you regarding the current negotiations between Coventry City Council, the Higgs Charity, ACL, and SISU, the present owners of Coventry City Football Club. As a proud Coventrian and Coventry fan yourself, I am sure that you like all fans are saddened by the demise of the football club over the past decade. The reasons for this demise as you well know are many and complex in nature-of that, there is no doubt. However, the 5 years experienced under the present owners has been one initially of relief as the club was rescued from the jaws of administration, ultimately concluding in anger and humiliation with relegation to the third tier.
During the past 3 years we have seen numerous changes at boardroom level, more assets sold than replaced, and the quality on the pitch steadily, then steeply, decline. Chairmen and board members have resigned in protest at the way SISU have run the club, new regimes have been installed and have repeatedly failed to show signs of real change. We have been promised transparency and been delivered none. We have been told that mistakes have been made, but mistakes continue to be made. We have been told repeatedly that the owners have the best interests of the club at heart, but their actions to date show them to be having their own interests at heart with the club a secondary concern. Die-hard fans have refused to go and watch the club they have supported for decades because the hurt is too much for them to continue.
That brings me to the focal point of this e-mail. Currently, the Council and 2 other parties find themselves with SISU at the negotiating table. Through these negotiations, SISU hope to acquire access to the lucrative benefits of stadium revenue and stakeholdings in the Ricoh Arena. Again, I implore you, as a Coventrian as well as a Coventry City fan, to fight tooth and nail to prevent such a secretive, devious organisation from acquiring such rights. The people of Coventry do not deserve such a valuable and core asset to the community to go to the wall whilst SISU seize the benefits-and nor should these people be allowed to have a terrific venue placed into their hands.
The stadium should ultimately belong to the football club, which itself belongs to the people of Coventry. Few people disagree with that. With these negotiations, the Council has an opportunity to fight for the people it is supposed to represent-handing over the reins to people who have laid waste to our football club is not what anybody wishes to see. In summary, my message to you is this: The club is of infinitely greater value to this city than a hedge fund can ever be-and for that reason, it is the club that should benefit from its home ahead of its devious owners. Put the club first, and I trust you to do what is right by Coventrians at home and far away.
Best regards, ____________
You think you could but that into a petition?
is John Clarke still a councillor?
anyone think a protest outside the council house would do any good? get some national news coverage instead of just CET???
You've done well to get a quick response Cloughie-I can't say his reply fills me with confidence.
ive created it but it has to be checked before it can go live on the hm website
The club owning the stadium is the only way forward for us.
PLease don't patronise in this way ,we do have brain cells between our ears ,and are obviously able to discern the various strands of our demise ,came to the conclusion many moons ago that the council have not been benign in their dealings with the club and the joke that have operated our club in the last two years are clueless,the bile they get they deserve.Hmmm....the sentiment is correct but guys the business world turns in mysterious ways and there are more than one way to skin a cat.
Whoever owns the stadium (and I've posted it elsewhere) the deal should ensure it will be a benefit of CCFc and not SISU per-say. That's the complicated issue for the negotiators to resolve who all know the truth and the facts.
The problem is we don't. Harping on with such sentiments as these only continue with rumour and conjecture and are not based on ant facts.
Paul Fletcher came out with a few comments regarding the shares issue originally and after reading that I gained a few more facts I was unaware of and realised the council played dirty too!
So guys lets leave this to the protagonist at the table and stop speculating and assuming complaining to the council is the right thing.
Those of you who have experience in business for any period of time may understand where I'm coming from. Those of you who have never had a business perhaps should defer your opinions until you know all the facts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?