Yeah, I read it this morning & then @Tomh111 posted it in another thread tooAbsolutely spot on...
But for a lapse at the back, would have been nigh on perfect.
For those questioning Hadji and Simms when Norwich had the ball Infront of them, this explains that them standing off was planned and to the benefit of CCFC, and exactly what they were asked to do.
@Frostie - you'll appreciate this.
A good and interesting read. (Thread of tweets)
(Plus a good insight into some of the finer tactical aspects of this particular game)
Tbf I've had to wade through umpteen posts just to get to this reply!No replies. Strange
Played the percentages?Excellent thread. Interesting point he makes at the end about that game being one of the more passive presses Norwich have used under Wagner.
I often think (eye test only, zero stats to back it up) that we've struggled against teams with a high pressing intensity - often results in us rushing our decisions/going long/giving away possession, so find it a bit odd that their game plan was to basically let us have it in our own half
I’d have liked to see us press the man a little more in this situation. We let them hold the ball and wait for them to pass out which led to a bit of stalemate at times.
The rationale behind their passive first line was to leave Gunn (28) as NCFC’s only free man, rather than pressing & leaving McLean (23) or Sara (17) free & accessible via a centre-back. • But when a CF (usually Simms) did press, he curved his run to force NCFC to 1 side.
To be fair , this proves that players are playing off instructions , it also pretty much confirms godden is also playing off instructionsNo replies. Strange, last week loads of posters said they knew exactly what robins wanted from a press.
xPashunI can't locate the 'who wanted it more' metric.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?