Brylowes
Well-Known Member
If that's correct then it has to be encouraging,
Unless they're like me and always open the mail late.
If that's correct then it has to be encouraging,The bid was sat with SISU for a week, which means they took it seriously and considered it. Roll on the next bid!
you would think that this is something that has to be given, otherwise he can make offer after offer and never come near their valuation. If you buy something, the starting point is surely knowing what the seller says they want. At least you can negotiate towards that figure.Maybe he is just upping his offer a bit at a time because that bloody woman hasn't said what sum she would accept, so he is just shooting in the dark.
A mid table finish next season would be by far the lowest league position in the club's history. There is no way that I would see that as a success. Like you I think that only promotion can be considered a success.I think a lot of people will be content and see a top half finish next season as an upturn,
IMHO anything other than promotion will be another abject failure, and will be followed
The season after with relegation.
The bid was sat with SISU for a week, which means they took it seriously and considered it. Roll on the next bid!
It's a leap of faith from someone who hasn't got one thing wrong so far when knowing whats going on behind the scenes. Believe me mate, I can't handle getting my hopes up either just to be kicked backed down again, but I trust him.Except it doesn't definitely mean that does it. It could have been ignored for a week. Why make stuff up?
Edit: That looks like I'm having a go. I'm not, but it is a massive leap of faith from practically nothing.
If it's been resting with them for a week it also contradicts the idea of leaks coming outIf a bid has gone in sat on a week and then rejected then that could mean a few different things. What is interesting to me if this is the case is Hoff has not came out and made it known that he is walking away. In fact the opposite everyone again been told to shut up and find solutions to the bid or find the common ground with SISU. I hope that this is the case and the bid is being considered again with them getting closer to resolution.
It's a leap of faith from someone who hasn't got one thing wrong so far when knowing whats going on behind the scenes. Believe me mate, I can't handle getting my hopes up either just to be kicked backed down again, but I trust him.
Exactly, that's why the 3rd bid being rejected isn't public, someone could of just put it out there to piss people off.Agree it also points to Sisu being serious about dealing and not trying to undermine the buyer. Quiet is all good by me and gives me hope somethings is very much going on behind the scenes.
Nick why put this on your site and then go on about it being false rumours. Your the biggest shit builder on here.
Rumours now about a 3rd bid, clearly not coming from CCFC's side either.
Might be worth keeping an eye out when things start coming out to see where they come from
Where have I said a third bid is made up?Nick why put this on your site and then go on about it being false rumours. Your the biggest shit builder on here.
How is it a wind up to point out why you can see it will be rejected and why it wasn't a good offer?
You need to come at it from a realistic point of view rather than "SISU don't deserve anything so should get what they are given". That won't make them go.
I'm not basing anything on what an expert said, I am basing it on what he was actually bidding for and why it was different to the £1 stuff.
Nobody is being attacked for having an opinion. They are having facts pointed out to them that shows why some things they say are incorrect. You can't just say things and then give it the "yeah but it's my opinion" line all of the time.
Since you said end of it has cleared everything up.£1 is a great offer and they should walk away end of.
£1 is a great offer and they should walk away end of.
Probably not, as they would have to explain that to Arvo investors who have a charge on everything. More likely end up as a fraud case - especially as higher bids have already been made.
I didnt say it was great for the investors i just said it was great. Oh and thank you for pointing out the higher bids i hadnt heard! lets just agree to disagree but lets be ho est i dont think there is a fan anywhere tbat doesnt want to see them leave......apart from that lee mier on fb lol
I didnt say it was great for the investors i just said it was great. Oh and thank you for pointing out the higher bids i hadnt heard! lets just agree to disagree but lets be ho est i dont think there is a fan anywhere tbat doesnt want to see them leave......apart from that lee mier on fb lol
I we got any hope then LG?Lets be honest there is only 1 person who really knows what's going on here. Me and I'm not telling.
Not very but after all the bad things they have done it would be nice to think they left us to the best deal for the club not the highest one .I do agree not realistic but I live in hope.Yes, we would all love them to leave for £1 and hand the club over debt free and a great fresh start to build on.
How realistic is it?
Not very but after all the bad things they have done it would be nice to think they left us to the best deal for the club not the highest one .I do agree not realistic but I live in hope.
Indeed.the deal if there is one to be done will not be a reflection of the underlying assets. It isn't about values of assets that ccfc own, it is basically what is the lowest Seppala will accept to go
The fact is it is just your opinion that the Hoffman's offerHow is it a wind up to point out why you can see it will be rejected and why it wasn't a good offer?
You need to come at it from a realistic point of view rather than "SISU don't deserve anything so should get what they are given". That won't make them go.
I'm not basing anything on what an expert said, I am basing it on what he was actually bidding for and why it was different to the £1 stuff.
Nobody is being attacked for having an opinion. They are having facts pointed out to them that shows why some things they say are incorrect. You can't just say things and then give it the "yeah but it's my opinion" line all of the time.
The thing is ,it is just your opinion that the Hoffman's 2 bids were bad offers it is not a fact, it is a fact that that SISU rejected them,but that doesn't make them bad offers. A lot of football 'experts' would probably view our club as worthless. SISU could value the club at a billion doesn't mean anybody would pay it, at the moment only Hoffman seems to put any monetary value on the club.How is it a wind up to point out why you can see it will be rejected and why it wasn't a good offer?
You need to come at it from a realistic point of view rather than "SISU don't deserve anything so should get what they are given". That won't make them go.
I'm not basing anything on what an expert said, I am basing it on what he was actually bidding for and why it was different to the £1 stuff.
Nobody is being attacked for having an opinion. They are having facts pointed out to them that shows why some things they say are incorrect. You can't just say things and then give it the "yeah but it's my opinion" line all of the time.
I don't think any potential bids will have any court wranglings in mind. After all SISU may drop their litigation process if they accept someones bid. Of course they could still pursue after selling.
Perhaps that is a stumbling block of any bid? So many ways of looking at this and structuring something acceptable to Joy. But as Shmmeee says why sell right now unless at your advantage for you to do so?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?