All I can see in the offer is a commitment to sell players and Ryton yet the club to earn only see half of that income. What's the plan for the academy and training ground if the plan is to sell Ryton? How is the asset base going to be improved?
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Grow up.You think the future is safer with SISU?
That would the investors to be just that, instead they're buying the club on its own credit cardI know what Fernando means. It's a shame that for the next five years we will be giving half of everything we make to SISU. Be nice for them to accept a figure and walk away. Unfortunately, it seems that the consortium either don't have the kind of capital SISU would accept or are reluctant to offer it.
All I can see in the offer is a commitment to sell players and Ryton yet the club to earn only see half of that income. What's the plan for the academy and training ground if the plan is to sell Ryton? How is the asset base going to be improved?
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Interesting that the new owners also wish to sell Ryton. Unless, of course, they have little choice as they can't raise more upfront capital. As long as we have a training base then really I'm not too bothered about Ryton.
Add a couple of million to the starting offer with the other terms and they're mad not to take.What would you say is a decent offer?
If I heard correctly I think he actually said the opposite although to please SISU with 50% of it it might be a necessary evil. The last part is my opinion not what Hoffman said.
All the words coming from the sisu camp sounds like it's a non starter. Would love to believe otherwise but you can't buy anything if the other is flat out refusing to sell.More positive than yesterday IMO. £1.2m is a bit random, I'd say there's more that can be bid by Hoffman.
Up front and a clean break is what's needed though, I can't help but suspect that the investors don't have the funds.These are perfectly legitimate questions, but surely the answers will not come (and cannot come) until SISU accept the bid. These investors would be foolish to show their full hand at this point. If they were to declare that after acquiring the club they would pump in £15 million, it opens the door for SISU to demand more of that up front.
I know what Fernando means. It's a shame that for the next five years we will be giving half of everything we make to SISU. Be nice for them to accept a figure and walk away. Unfortunately, it seems that the consortium either don't have the kind of capital SISU would accept or are reluctant to offer it.
What did you call me ,Where in the quote does it say that you mong
Doesn't look good does it
50% of players sales, don't sell any players = nothing owed
All the words coming from the sisu camp sounds like it's a non starter. Would love to believe otherwise but you can't buy anything if the other is flat out refusing to sell.
No plan to sell Ryton as far as I can see, just providing SISU with a guarantee if it's sold in the future.Interesting that the new owners also wish to sell Ryton. Unless, of course, they have little choice as they can't raise more upfront capital. As long as we have a training base then really I'm not too bothered about Ryton.
Up front and a clean break is what's needed though, I can't help but suspect that the investors don't have the funds.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
NIce one. Give them all away or swap deals only!
These are perfectly legitimate questions, but surely the answers will not come (and cannot come) until SISU accept the bid. These investors would be foolish to show their full hand at this point. If they were to declare that after acquiring the club they would pump in £15 million, it opens the door for SISU to demand more of that up front.
Do they expect someone to take on the debt they created.
None of the noise coming from the club is now saying that we are not for sale as they have previously done, only that the bids weren't acceptable.Everything is for sale, at the right price.
If SISU have rejected this second offer surely they need to say:
A) Why
and
B) What would be acceptable
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I suspect you're right. They may have the funds to make a 'walkaway' offer to SISU, but that might leave them with nothing to fix the mess that's left behind.
Grow up.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
None of the noise coming from the club is now saying that we are not for sale as they have previously done, only that the bids weren't acceptable.
What would you say is a decent offer?
If SISU have rejected this second offer surely they need to say:
A) Why
and
B) What would be acceptable
The offer makes no sense
A lot of add ons based on if buts and maybes. Most of the offer is based on a premier league return and did t he say a timescale on the add ons of 7 years?
The upfront money they would double by selling Ryton.
Do these people actually have any money at all?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?