Astute, do you honestly believe that the club could have played at the Ricoh free of charge under the councils 'rent free' offer? Anyone who looked into it in even the slightest way realised that it was just more publicity spin from CCC to put the club in even more bad light.
There was one reason that CCC wanted us back at the Ricoh and that was to push through the sale of ACL to Wasps.
As for playing at Rushden, it was one that the club looked at prior to Sixfields and has just been dug up again.
I'm pretty sure we weren't allowed to enter a second season in administration which is why it had to come to a head in the pre season? So the free rent in admin was an empty offer?So they weren't rent free then, unless the club remained in administration which obviously would be bad and would probably incur further point deduction if we remained in it for too long.
I'm pretty sure we weren't allowed to enter a second season in administration which is why it had to come to a head in the pre season? So the free rent in admin was an empty offer?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I'm pretty sure we weren't allowed to enter a second season in administration which is why it had to come to a head in the pre season? So the free rent in admin was an empty offer?
What I said was that SISU had offers to bring our club home but didn't look into any of them.
Last time they had CCC to blame for everything. But once the reduced rent offers and then the rent free offer came in the FL could see that they had not been told the full truth. They won't let SISU take our club out of Coventry so easily next time. Although once they start their threat of moving or liquidating our club again would the FL crumble once more?
Maybe the FL saw through the rent free offer like most that it couldn't actually happen and it wasn't actually free?
I said I didn't think it was free as SISU would still have had to pay match day costs :facepalm:
Why do some people have to argue over nothing?
Why do some people chat so much shit? It isn't arguing, it is correcting .
There was no free offer - it was impossible to agree that offer. The other offer went back to the original rent at the expiry of the headline rent deal
Why do some people chat so much shit? It isn't arguing, it is correcting.
Especially when you throw in your lines line "another one with a poor memory" as if it is others who are talking absolute bollocks.
Evidence ?
TF does not count !!
and then the rent free offer came in the FL could see that they had not been told the full truth.
So I said free offer that wasn't free.
So I said free offer that wasn't free. You pull me up about the free offer saying it wasn't free. Me chatting shit?
He asked me what free offer and then said about it. So was it poor memory or taking the piss? Yet it is me still chatting shit.
Very sorry for saying something that you see against SISU although it wasn't meant that way Nick. So you think that the FL and FA will let them take us out of Coventry as easily as last time or do you agree with the point I am trying to make?
The only one with memory issues is you.
You've already forgotten what you posted 10 minutes ago.
Got a bad memory? I remember yesterday you saying that you had me on ignore. As truthful as ever I say.
It wasn't free, because it wasn't possible was it because of the conditions?
If they didn't want to listen, why are we back?And as I said a few times now it wasn't really free. Which part of this are you having a problem understanding?
And as I have also been saying and asking you.......do you think that the FL and FA would let SISU move us out of Coventry as easily as last time with them not looking as though they wanted to listen to deals to get us back? It is the only point I tried to make but certain people are trying not to answer it but just come out with their own agenda.
If they didn't want to listen, why are we back?
The club would need a strong case for it.
I would say that I agree with the majority of us and they knew that Wasps had got what they wanted but SISU didn't want to take over the loan.
BTW thanks for your answer. It was all I was after
If they didn't want to listen, why are we back?
The club would need a strong case for it.
I would think not being able to achieve being cash flow positive at Sixfields was a strong case for SISU.
Why did they start the season there then?
You did say it was free, however.
Why did they start the season there then?
Why don't you read the Judicial Review. The judge answered this pretty clearly. Or were you distracted by waiting for smoking guns?
Why don't you read the Judicial Review. The judge answered this pretty clearly. Or were you distracted by waiting for smoking guns?
I don't think we'd be back under a council based agreement - do you?
I don't think we'd be back under a council based agreement - do you?
It wasn't free, because it wasn't possible was it because of the conditions?
I thought it was free but we needed to pay any expenses incurred. The timing was crucial as Sisu were applying leverage on ACL / CCC for the Ricoh freehold. Hence TF had to play it down. Depends whether you were for or against the council whether you believed him or not.
It was a cheap publicity stunt from Mr 'come see my shiny pound' Hoffman.
I think they're talking about the offer made through the FL by ACL. The one TF and Co tried to deny after the story was broke by David Conn IIRC only for the FL to confirm such an offer had been made through them to the CET tea boy IIRC.
I think that's the one anyway.
They didn't exactly deny it. They did Grendels favorite trick and did a play with words to change what was said.
Play with words? What was ACL's statement then?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?