ICHAN
Well-Known Member
Who are they NLHWC? yes there are proberly I agree but thats upto them and there opinion so thats fine.
Who are they NLHWC? yes there are proberly I agree but thats upto them and there opinion so thats fine.Oh there's 2 or 3 left, ICHAN.
In my opinion Thorne is a fat clown who can't look after himself let alone a football team.I don't want us to stop playing this style of of football which is why I want Thorn to stay. He has had no resources, has been lied to and none of this is his fault.
I think we are going down regardless of who is in charge and in a funny way if we do go down it could get rid of SISU quicker.
People are ignoring the bigger picture. WE NEED SISU OUT.
In my opinion Thorne is a fat clown who can't look after himself let alone a football team.
I ask yet again though, were you predicting a 2nd from bottom and 7 points adrift position by the end of November? No! Fact is, none of us did.
I think most of most expected us to struggle. And that's exactly what were doing.
IM SICK OF THESE STUPID THREADS....WHEN YOU WILL GET IT INTO YOUR THICK feckING HEAD, 1 they wont sack him he is on the cheap and costs them less, 2 NOBODY i repeat NOBODY could do anything with these TWATS in charge so dont have a go at him, you all seem to forget that without AT we would have be relegated years ago, he was the one that got Dann, Fox, Westwood, Gunnarson, Jukewitcz, Bigi, Thomas and all the other decent players weve had over the last 3 seasons so PIPE THE feck DOWN
You expected this though? Bottom and 7 points adrift at the beginning of December. :facepalm:
We are 1 0 down against Peterborough with ten minutes to go and AT brings on 1 sub WTF .This is one of the reasons he needs to go he seems to think losing by 1goal is ok we need a change be it or whoever doesn't matter you get a honeymoon period when someone new comes in and fuck me we need one now.
Oh there's 2 or 3 left, ICHAN.
You remind me of a lemming following our leader off the edge of a cliff certain suicide.
Did you know the whole lemming suicide myth was created by a faked 1958 Disney film which won an Oscar, the makers drove thousands of rodents over a cliff. Somewhat worse than David Attenborough don't you think?
[video=youtube;xMZlr5Gf9yY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMZlr5Gf9yY[/video]
THEY TELL YOU WHO YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BID FOR,
not buy,
because the purse strings are held by people who know s.f.a. about football,
when will the penny drop ?
Ultimately the owners always have the purse strings and the manager is advised of his budget - large or small - so the penny drops every time. Thorn, however, has not demonstrated any aptitide for football management whatsoever regardless of the financial situation. The irony is it is only because of the anger aimed at SISU that has saved his job and hidden the obvious shortcomings that he has. So when WILL the enny drop? It's funny really as it is only SISU and their bungling incompetence that keeps the useless fool in a job. A half decent, interested board would have sacked him weeks ago - correction they would never have considered him in the first place. Even Owen Coyle looks ready for the axe soon and we give Thorn more and more rope - it's hilarious.
Wake up, not investing in the squad and reducing the squad is the reason we are where we are.
Totally agree. I have never called for AT to go before but recently I have concluded that the bloke has zero man management skills. His treatment of Freddie has been apalling and now he seems to be doing the same to Deegan.Nope is a contributing factor as is the incompetent manager. Or what are you saying the tea lady can manage a football team if we have the right investment and the attributes of the manager mean nothing. Name one positive attribute Thorn has bought to the job this season that demonstrates you have confidence in him as a manager? I suspect you will not have an answer - you need to wake up before we sleepwalk to oblivion with good old Captain Thorn at the helm.
Right so Harry Redknapp couldn't stop Southampton from going down from the championship to league 1.
They had no money and couldn't bring the players in like Thorn.
So did that make him a bad manager too ?
No it didn't.
It doesn't matter who is in charge, without any backing it's always going to be a struggle.
No but Redknapp has pedigree - so we are confident he is a good manager. Just because there is no money does not make Andy Thorn a good manager!! Gaz name a couple of things he has done this season that in your view makes him potential good management material.
He often waves to singers corner?
No but Redknapp has pedigree - so we are confident he is a good manager. Just because there is no money does not make Andy Thorn a good manager!! Gaz name a couple of things he has done this season that in your view makes him potential good management material.
No one is saying Thorn is a good manager because there is no money !
And shouldn't the point that if a manager with 'pedigree' like Redknapp, can't keep a poor side up with no money then why the surprise when ours can't ?
We all could see before the season kicked off that if we didn't invest in the side, we were in trouble.
Struggle yes Gaz I think even the most AT out fans will acknowledge that.
How does anyone know someone else would not make a differance with this squad, is that because those who say this want it to be true and so back their arguement up for wanting to keep AT in his job and so he carries on failing and can therefore have more ammunition to aim their hatred at sisu for the mess we are in.
Would you not want to try a new manager to see if we can get out of this mess, try any route possible to maybe get out of this, or do we keep AT no matter what even in league 1 where these players will struggle even more.
I want to try anything Gaz and the manager is the only plausable position that can be changed.
We all want sisu out but that will be their decision when they want out which could be next year no-one knows only sisu themselves and they proberly lie to themselves about that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?