Absolutely. People just need to be able to move to areas that accommodate one or the other. I do hope, however, that having safe standing doesn't encourage more standing in those areas that are still for the majority of supporters who wish to sit. Will the stewards clamp down on it should it happen ?Agree. Feel like this just makes my point for me. Don't want to stand? Don't buy a ticket in the safe standing blocks.
given it's just something that has been knocked up in 5 minutes on microsoft forms who knowsIf you submit multiple entirie, don’t the6 just cancel each other out?
So you will move to the North Stand to stand?I voted north stand even though im in singers , reason being I’ve never sat down in singers so there’s no change really. It has to be behind the goal
Giving some fans what they want.People are standing at games. That's not how all-seater stadium were designed to function safely.
Safe standing solves that problem. Spaces where people stand all game are designed with that in mind.
I'm really struggling to see the argument against removing some risks and giving fans what they want.
Equally if you don’t want to sit, don’t buy a ticket in the seated areas.Agree. Feel like this just makes my point for me. Don't want to stand? Don't buy a ticket in the safe standing blocks.
I would have thought they will have to.Absolutely. People just need to be able to move to areas that accommodate one or the other. I do hope, however, that having safe standing doesn't encourage more standing in those areas that are still for the majority of supporters who wish to sit. Will the stewards clamp down on it should it happen ?
Giving some fans what they want.
Yes ,if it proper standing plus I’m a lazy f##k so nearer to the casino.So you will move to the North Stand to stand?
Safe Standing Roadshow - Can safe standing increase capacity?
Q: Can safe standing increase capacity? A: Yes, it can. Where there is enough room and where the law allows it. Q: Is there enough room at my club’s ground? A: Yes, if the seating rows are deep enough (ideally at least 750mm deep) and the exits and other elements of the infrastructure (including,www.safestandingroadshow.co.uk
Interesting way of Doubling capacity, whether we have room at the CBS for this method is debatable.
If people are standing in a no standing area in front of people who want to - or need to - sit, then I’m all for militant stewarding.If the safe standing blocks are 14-16, then the amount of people that want to stand will outnumber the amount of "safe standing" seats available significantly. One of my concerns is that this will lead to militant stewarding/policing against the people choosing to stand outside of the safe standing area, thereby causing more problems than it supposedly solves.
No sameWill tickets be cheaper for those in railed seating ? Probably cost more for being able to both sit and have the luxury of leaning on a shiny new bit of tin.
And I'll ask you again. What are the risks that rail seats removes vs persistent standing in front of a normal seat?
I voted the opposite. Surely it'd make sense to implement the safe standing in an area where the majority already stand?I voted north stand even though im in singers , reason being I’ve never sat down in singers so there’s no change really. It has to be behind the goal
If the safe standing blocks are 14-16, then the amount of people that want to stand will outnumber the amount of "safe standing" seats available significantly. One of my concerns is that this will lead to militant stewarding/policing against the people choosing to stand outside of the safe standing area, thereby causing more problems than it supposedly solves.
Completed it and went for Singers corner,should be behind the goal tho .
Nothing to me but my wife got one!I've had it to my son
No I was just thinking more akin to how the west terrace used to be, and how it is at St Andrews.Nature says there will always be the older the older generation and even younger who stand at work all day?
Did you mean back rows?
But that can change.I voted the opposite. Surely it'd make sense to implement the safe standing in an area where the majority already stand?
We have 1We don't have one.
It’s then restricting the choice of those who want to sit.Why not have it behind both goals and the corner, give people the choice.
But that’s only 14-16 and not behind the goalI voted the opposite. Surely it'd make sense to implement the safe standing in an area where the majority already stand?
Same here. In block 16 for years and just inside the area that will become safe standing if they proceed as they said they would. I support safe standing coming in but I will have to move seat. I can’t stand all game these days. I’ll be sad to move seats but getting older is a one way journeyNo, they're not FOR people to stand but many in those blocks DO stand. I don't and neither do a lot of others. We are on the periphery on 16, so we might be OK, if that area is chosen. I've sat there for years, so I don't really want to move.
But that can change.
people stand in that area because it has been the closes t they could get to the away fans.
If part of the South Stand is opened up to home supporters the standing area would migrate around behind the goal to once again be as close to the away fans as possible. I'm sure they'd like to be more behind the goal if they could be.
Does anyone know the actual EFL rules as KI am pretty sure that in the PL if you have safe standing you also have to have it available for away fans as well?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?