Sandra Garlick (1 Viewer)

sw88 · Dec 10, 2013

martcov said:
She has all the qualifications SISU need. She owns a solicitors firm.

How long before our current ones who've earns a fortune are thanked for their services, but handed their termination of contract?

Delboycov · Dec 10, 2013

Skyblueweeman said:
In other news...let's be positive about this. We're not going back to the Ricoh. Unless one of us wins millions and millions on the Euromillions and has a moment of madness on throwing it all away, we're not going back to the Ricoh.

If they're going to build a new stadium (and I know that's a massive 'if'), shouldn't we be happy that someone like this, a lifelonf CCFC fan, is heading up this particular forum?

WM

Thing is WM if I was a Coventry born CCFC fan and I had any involvement in giving credence to a plan for building a tinpot stadium outside my home city then I'd be ashamed....No true CCFC fan should even humour them over this...it won't be built and she should use her undoubted talents to try and persuade the warring parties to get us back home where we belong.

ohitsaidwalker king power · Dec 10, 2013

Can we have a stadium with less smoke and no mirrors please?

tuousis · Dec 10, 2013

RFC said:
More like a modern 'Highfield Road' with good atmosphere, than like the 'soulless' Ricoh, PLEASE!

And a statue of Fisher at the entrance.

ohitsaidwalker king power · Dec 10, 2013

tuousis said:
And a statue of Fisher at the entrance.

At whose entrance...?:thinking about:

Jack Griffin · Dec 10, 2013

If you want to delay things get a committee to discuss them..

mark_ccfc · Dec 10, 2013

James Smith said:
Done!

thanks

wingy · Dec 10, 2013

Deleted member 5849 said:
Or the Eurovision singer!

Nearly went over my head ,the Irony of her entry "Come Back" !!

Grendel · Dec 10, 2013

italiahorse said:
Everyday my support drifts further away.

Facts that should be available now are finances allocated and capacity planned.

Everyday you bore us by telling us of your support drifting away......

Rusty Trombone · Dec 10, 2013

Jack Griffin said:
If you want to delay things get a committee to discuss them..

Frankly that is ridiculous, but at the same time all fans must recognise that it is important for the new stadium, which has always been plan A, to be designed taking into account it's surroundings. I think all genuine fans will appreciate that we should not buy any land, or really look for any, until a design has been completely agreed with.

The above statement may or may not be delivered by Tim Fisher at some point around Christmas.

Skyblueweeman · Dec 10, 2013

Delboycov said:
Thing is WM if I was a Coventry born CCFC fan and I had any involvement in giving credence to a plan for building a tinpot stadium outside my home city then I'd be ashamed....No true CCFC fan should even humour them over this...it won't be built and she should use her undoubted talents to try and persuade the warring parties to get us back home where we belong.

Fair points Delboy. But you're making assumptions. 'Tinpot'...surely if it's new and fans have an input then it's going to be anything but tinpot. Far all it's downsides, asthetically, the Ricoh was hardly a step backwards from HR?

As you say it won't be built...how do you know that? Maybe I'm being naive, but this talk of Northampton Sky Blues is a load of old tosh. We will come back to the city...not sure when that is, but we will. I suspect that we there's been too much water under the bridge for a Ricoh return. Something drastic will have to happen for that...new owners or the demise in ACL. I personally cannot see either happening.

WM

italiahorse · Dec 10, 2013

Grendel said:
Everyday you bore us by telling us of your support drifting away......

This should be a worry. Real fans that attend matches giving up attendance.
Keyboard warriors continuing there campaign but not counting in Sisue calculations.
You are irrelavant to everybody but yourself.

davebart · Dec 10, 2013

Rusty Trombone said:
I think all genuine fans will appreciate that we should not buy any land, or really look for any, until a design has been completely agreed with.

Then all genuine fans know nothing about design. You do not start a design until you know where it is going.

RoboCCFC90 · Dec 10, 2013

Is it coincidence I now have someone following me under the same name on Twitter?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wafw1971 · Dec 10, 2013

If a new stadium is to be built and that's a big 'IF' then I would like to see a two tiered stadium similiar to MK Dons but I would prefer a square design not a bowl (old fashioined type). It would be 32,000 stadium but only the lower tier would be open to start with. The away fans would be in a corner, homes fans behind both goals.

Sky Blue Harry H · Dec 10, 2013

Sandra - the whole thing stinks (no offence)

sky blue zam · Dec 10, 2013

Best part of the telegraph article has to be this:

"The forum will consult fans over unique touches to make the stadium reflect the history and character of the Sky Blues."

Patronising or what

Johnnythespider · Dec 10, 2013

wingy said:
HERE SHE IS , I HATE TO DEBASE THE CONVO BUT SHE'S A BIT OF A HONEY

If she gets bored with this project I believe the BBC may have a spot for a dark haired temptress to do a cookery show. On an even more frivolous note I went to school with a lad called William Garlick, he had a large brown birthmark on the back of his leg, school kids being what they are he was constantly asked if he had poo on his leg.

colin101 · Dec 10, 2013

Thought I had seen the name De Marco Solicitors, I see Sandra Garlick is featured on the official CCFC site as sponsor and is quoted

"I had no idea when we agreed to sponsor the goals and highlights package, that the team would be so prolific in front of goal"... Sandra Garlick, Wed 21 Aug 2013

Read more at http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/demarco-highlights-sponsorship-1005537.aspx#hVAkKSyUdzgzU22y.99

italiahorse · Dec 10, 2013

wafw1971 said:
If a new stadium is to be built and that's a big 'IF' then I would like to see a two tiered stadium similiar to MK Dons but I would prefer a square design not a bowl (old fashioined type). It would be 32,000 stadium but only the lower tier would be open to start with. The away fans would be in a corner, homes fans behind both goals.

From information provided by Sisue.
It will be 12,000 to start with and expand to 20,000.
They are too scared to tell us.

Grendel · Dec 10, 2013

italiahorse said:
From information provided by Sisue.
It will be 12,000 to start with and expand to 20,000.
They are too scared to tell us.

Bollocks why are you boring us with lies?

bringbackrattles · Dec 10, 2013

blimey women are taking over first Seppalla now this Garlick lady,call me sexist but it'll lead nowhere ! Got to end this now if my missus catches me writing this I'm doomed !

italiahorse · Dec 10, 2013

Grendel said:
Bollocks why are you boring us with lies?

Wake up and smell the coffee,
Your boy friend has already said £20M based on Rotherhams.

dadgad · Dec 10, 2013

I see this as further evidence of Fisher being told to wind his neck in.
Could be good news, if she eventually "has" to announce a return to the Ricoh.

mark_ccfc · Dec 10, 2013

Grendel said:
Bollocks why are you boring us with lies?

Calm down man - you really have got the hots for Joy haven't you?

Jack Griffin · Dec 10, 2013

davebart said:
Then all genuine fans know nothing about design. You do not start a design until you know where it is going.

Correct, I've posted that before, in my far off days in Civil Engineering I never worked on a design project before the site was identified & surveyed from a geological & topological point of view.. then where is the drainage going, how do you get power there, how can you get access, you can't just build a new road junction you know.. the list goes on..

italiahorse · Dec 10, 2013

Does that information affect basic assumptions like stadium size and design?

skybluefred · Dec 10, 2013

tuousis said:
And a statue of Fisher at the entrance.

Good idea it should ensure RFC is the only attendee.

Specs WT-R75 · Dec 10, 2013

wafw1971 said:
If a new stadium is to be built and that's a big 'IF' then I would like to see a two tiered stadium similiar to MK Dons but I would prefer a square design not a bowl (old fashioined type). It would be 32,000 stadium but only the lower tier would be open to start with. The away fans would be in a corner, homes fans behind both goals.

Hi all, long time lurker and former ST holder @ HR1 (WT R75).

The above would pretty much get my seal of approval (location not withstanding). At the end of the day we all want to see a massive stadium, but realistically capacity only needs to be 15k or so initially with the ability to add additional tiers during close seasons... basically whatever would get us back to Coventry the quickest.

Ellis

skybluefred · Dec 10, 2013

Skyblueweeman said:
Fair points Delboy. But you're making assumptions. 'Tinpot'...surely if it's new and fans have an input then it's going to be anything but tinpot. Far all it's downsides, asthetically, the Ricoh was hardly a step backwards from HR?

As you say it won't be built...how do you know that? Maybe I'm being naive, but this talk of Northampton Sky Blues is a load of old tosh. We will come back to the city...not sure when that is, but we will. I suspect that we there's been too much water under the bridge for a Ricoh return. Something drastic will have to happen for that...new owners or the demise in ACL. I personally cannot see either happening.

WM

For what they claim to be planning, even at today's prices,they will be looking at upwards of £40k. In 5 years time when
it MIGHT be completed it could well cost more and would not be up to the Ricoh standards or capacity.

Therefore would it not be good business sense to offer CCC/ACL £40k for the Ricoh. Oops I forgot, sisu and good
business sense, nah forget it.

ricohroar · Dec 10, 2013

http://www.panoramio.com/m/photo/5346456 one like this please 1 mile from Coventry City centre. Cheers love

mark_ccfc · Dec 10, 2013

Come off it - we all know this is another piece of SISU spin. Whether Sandra Garlick realises it or not she is being used as another SISU PR stunt.
"Coventry Stadium receives support of successful Coventry businesswoman so it must be a good idea!"

As far as I am concerned the creation of a fans forum in support of a new stadium on the back of the rejection of the Ricoh rent offer is yet another slap in the face to the fans of Coventry Football Club.

Jack Griffin · Dec 10, 2013

italiahorse said:
Does that information affect basic assumptions like stadium size and design?

Could do especially if ground conditions are bad. I think the slope of the ground is very important too, look at the Ricoh it is on a fairly steep slope & substantial parts of design are effected by that.

skybluefred · Dec 10, 2013

ricohroar said:
http://www.panoramio.com/m/photo/5346456 one like this please 1 mile from Coventry City centre. Cheers love

Looks more like a converted empty shoe box--still that would be big enough for RFC.

Deleted member 5849 · Dec 10, 2013

Jack Griffin said:
Could do especially if ground conditions are bad. I think the slope of the ground is very important too, look at the Ricoh it is on a fairly steep slope & substantial parts of design are effected by that.

One would assume however, regardless of anything, this consultation is only about trivia such as whether we hang pictures of Keith Houchen up in the foyers.

Let's face it, Britain doesn't generally do 'interesting' for stadiums designs, do they, and if I asked for one like Le Havre's, I suspect I'd be even more disappointed than when the picture of Houchen turns out to be a pulsating cock modern art installation, spilling out lager to the punters below from its tip!

Sandra Garlick (1 Viewer)

Chief Commentator!

Active Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Jack Griffin

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Jack Griffin

Guest

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Jack Griffin

Guest

New Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency