Tim Fisher insisted that meetings took place and he didn't understand how councils reported officers meetings internally but didn't want to make an issue of it as that might embarass Rugby council and they want to be able to work in cooperation with them in the future. Also stated that the rejection of the Coventry Gateway plan by Eric Pickles was a setback for the plans.
So basically he is saying RBC released false information on a FOI?
Brilliant apologies I missed
Million times and I bloody missed it so sorry Grendal please
Roughly what did the club say will be the interest we will be paying yearly once the stadium is built?
Does that interest get taken into consideration for FFP?
Once it is built how then will SISU get their new debt level of around 70-80 million back?
I can't believe I missed the satisfactory answers to this questions a million times.
Please go on Grendel the floor is yours....
The answer will be it will be co funded by business development partners.
This is why they claim to be interested in a 60 acre site. So this means that they will be funded by developers who in turn will make a return from it.
Other clubs are building new stadiums and what fisher should really be asked is why clubs like Scunthorpe seem to have a far quicker timeline.
In this league Ffp doesn't take interest rates into account.
Great thanks for that now any chance of answering the questions I asked. Which apparently have been answered a million times?
Thought not
The answer will be it will be co funded by business development partners.
This is why they claim to be interested in a 60 acre site. So this means that they will be funded by developers who in turn will make a return from it.
Other clubs are building new stadiums and what fisher should really be asked is why clubs like Scunthorpe seem to have a far quicker timeline.
In this league Ffp doesn't take interest rates into account.
Which business development partners are these? Have they confirmed they have an agreement with anyone?
No - but Don seems to know costs - best speak to him.
I wasn't asking about the costs. I was asking about the partners you've apparently heard about a million times.
I wasn't asking about the costs. I was asking about the partners you've apparently heard about a million times.
You don't mean to say you think Grendel is(Dare I say it)..........Guessing/Estimating?....*runs away laughing*Neither of you know whether it's true or not, just guess work.
You don't mean to say you think Grendel is(Dare I say it)..........Guessing/Estimating?....*runs away laughing*
You don't mean to say you think Grendel is(Dare I say it)..........Guessing/Estimating?....*runs away laughing*
No I'm answering the question for don. Sisu aren't building a stadium anyway.
Everyone who states that finance for the new stadium will be A, B or C is guessing or estimating, aren't they?
I think they are!
Which sort of brings us back to Dons original point. Where's the business plans? We haven't seen either the plan's for the development or the business plans to achieve it. All we've had is a generic drawing and Mr Fisher saying "that will work".
I think they are!
Eri I did answer - the debt will not increase and interest payments aren't a part of FFP
The debt won't increase? So other organisations are going to pay for the whole project?
You will find that is not correct and our debt will increase. So we need to get an idea roughly of how much?
The interest is not considered in SCMP? However it is in FFP. So if we are promoted which presumedly is the aim. We need to know how much interest will we be charged in comparison to the increase in revenue we receive ?
No a separate construction company would build the stadium - a similar strategy to other new builds.
No - but Don seems to know costs - best speak to him.
Are they going to soley fund it or will we partly fund it?
We will be partly funding our debt will go up, we need to know by how much.
Everyone who states that finance for the new stadium will be A, B or C is guessing or estimating, aren't they?
Exactly so we need to club who are apparently doing it to give us some figures and what the end game is.
Grendel tried to make out we already know and have been told a million times. when clearly when asked to give the answer he can't
Fishers answered it on another thread!!! Christ.
See my edited post. No funding at all but it's not happening anyway so why carry on?
Tim Fisher insisted that meetings took place and he didn't understand how councils reported officers meetings internally but didn't want to make an issue of it as that might embarass Rugby council and they want to be able to work in cooperation with them in the future. Also stated that the rejection of the Coventry Gateway plan by Eric Pickles was a setback for the plans.
No I'm answering the question for don. Sisu aren't building a stadium anyway.
I'd rather they left and let someone build a stadium properly...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?