On 17th September Les Reid's article in the Telegraph focused around the 'eight-week target' being missed (http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-miss-eight-week-target-6039709)
The line from CBRE was:
A spokesman for CBRE said: “We are continuing to work closely with the club to find a suitable location, with four potential sites currently being considered, one of which we have agreed terms on, and this continues to progress well.
“Due diligence on the site is likely to take a further four weeks.
“As previously confirmed, we have short-listed a handful of sites, all of which are within six miles of Coventry city centre.
The 17th September was four weeks ago. Still no further forwards are we Mr Fisher? Yet another self-imposed timeframe to reassure fans that you've missed - much like the ten days it was going to take for our new sponsor.
If TF is full of shit - why do you take a blind bit of notice of any of these stories? I know I certainly don't
Because clearly 1,500 or so still do believe Fisher, and publicising his lies on here may get some of them to see what the rest of us have seen from day 1?
I dont think they believe him, they just want to watch the Sky Blues.
If TF is full of shit - why do you take a blind bit of notice of any of these stories? I know I certainly don't
I'd just like some details as to what it will entail. Even if we can't have an artists impression until we get a site, surely we know roughly what we'll be building? Will there be a shop? Training ground? Community facilities? What's the plan?
Well just heard they spoke to Rugby Council "informally" and we're told to piss off. That's one site at least. Maybe the delay is getting anyone to actually agree to grant planning.
Well just heard they spoke to Rugby Council "informally" and we're told to piss off. That's one site at least. Maybe the delay is getting anyone to actually agree to grant planning.
Because clearly 1,500 or so still do believe Fisher, and publicising his lies on here may get some of them to see what the rest of us have seen from day 1?
I'm losing track, which of the potential sites would Rugby Council cover, would it be Brandon?
I'm losing track, which of the potential sites would Rugby Council cover, would it be Brandon?
Is there actually a viable site left (that's not greenbelt) far enough away from Coventry to not need CCC involvement on the infrastructure side of things that hasn't already been sold for some other purpose?
No, 1500 people want to watch their team play football.
So they know its all lies but still go?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?