I’m starting to come round to the idea that SISU may be picking up these bonds that are being traded because they sit at a 10% discount (or thereabouts). That way it gives them a direct channel to take on the lease if/when Wasps fail, and that will only be accelerated if any wrongdoing is found through this EC investigation. This would also give the ‘business’ an asset on the balance sheet at a lesser cost than construction and would make us eminently more saleable, which I believe is SISU’s objective now as they prepare their exit strategy. It’d be interesting to know whether AEG are still interested in taking on management of the arena operations (but also - I suppose - the cost involved in that). They have a track record of investment in sports teams so may be the option further down the road.
The recent press releases and now this interview have just made me wonder again that if they had just COMMUNICATED from the beginning - when Ranson left, the Sixfields debacle, administration...could they have saved themselves a little. They have made bad, misjudged decisions all the way along but if they had tried to speak about the reasons and the next steps more people may have been willing to not necessarily agree with them but at least listen. This is all very, very late in the offing.
The recent press releases and now this interview have just made me wonder again that if they had just COMMUNICATED from the beginning - when Ranson left, the Sixfields debacle, administration...could they have saved themselves a little. They have made bad, misjudged decisions all the way along but if they had tried to speak about the reasons and the next steps more people may have been willing to not necessarily agree with them but at least listen. This is all very, very late in the offing.
Weirdo alert!!!!I'd shag Seppela all day every day if it meant we stayed in Birmingham forever!
Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk
If that's how it works then Eastwood must be shitting himself!Individuals on the Facebook forum somehow justifying forced entry and burglary as a result of SISU robbing a city of its club. Some people are so backwards it's beyond comprehension.
Which bonds are SISU buying? I assume from the context that these are Wasps' bonds? I've missed this story - do you have a link?
When you say that the bonds are trading at a discount I assume that you mean to par value? This is very normal in the bond markets: the strike price moves as forward interest rates move. So if a bond pays a 5% coupon but forward interest rates rise to 6%, the traded price of the bond will fall so that the effective interest rate is 6%. However the price of an individual bond can also fall if the credit rating of the issuer falls. The interest rate on a bond is made of two parts: Risk Free forward interest rates + Issuer Credit Spread. If I knew which bonds you were talking about I could calculate what is happening. Another possibility is that they were sold at a discount at the start!
I don't follow the logic that having bonds on the balance sheet makes us more saleable or better access to the Ricoh lease..
Same here, it's criminals who broke in, regardless of what team they claim to support. Either way shocking if true, welcome to England Joy!That is not explicitly said. However, I'd be surprised if city fans would go to that length to get to her.
Which bonds are SISU buying? I assume from the context that these are Wasps' bonds? I've missed this story - do you have a link?
When you say that the bonds are trading at a discount I assume that you mean to par value? This is very normal in the bond markets: the strike price moves as forward interest rates move. So if a bond pays a 5% coupon but forward interest rates rise to 6%, the traded price of the bond will fall so that the effective interest rate is 6%. However the price of an individual bond can also fall if the credit rating of the issuer falls. The interest rate on a bond is made of two parts: Risk Free forward interest rates + Issuer Credit Spread. If I knew which bonds you were talking about I could calculate what is happening. Another possibility is that they were sold at a discount at the start!
I don't follow the logic that having bonds on the balance sheet makes us more saleable or better access to the Ricoh lease..
I think what you've touched on is pretty spot on. Through SISU's consistent radio silence, ACL, CCC, Wasps have been able to create their own image of SISU through the media, which in many ways has turned them into the pantomime villain that many consider them to be. If they'd simply communicated more frequently and provided an explanation to some of your stated actions then whilst the fans still may not have agreed with them, at least they would've had an understanding. Whether it would've managed the toxicity and division can only be speculated upon but I certainly think it would've helped.
Very confusing to see mate, on one hand you've got this appeal that she seems confident of winning which will get us the ricoh for cheap however you've then got her saying 'im not going to be around forever' normally SISU say were not for sale......"Considering she rarely gives any tv interviews you'd have to think that its her wanting some TV exposure rather than SISU relenting and agreeing to an interview. The fact the platform is Sky Sports infers that she thinks that they will be more sympathetic to their plight as Sky Sports will only focus on the football and fans element, as opposed to a local or national news channel interviewing her.
I'm not quite sure what she's trying to achieve. All parties involved have stated their standpoint. I can't see the wider football community being that interested.
I actually think this is a very fair comment from this fan on the Wasps forum. What is she actually trying to achieve from doing this interview?
You seem like a person who can answer this.
Is this how it works?
You buy a bond for let's say £100. Each year out of the five years it makes compound interest of 6.5%
This would give you a total of around £137.
Then the bond matures and you get the return of original bond price at the market rate.
Very confusing to see mate, on one hand you've got this appeal that she seems confident of winning which will get us the ricoh for cheap however you've then got her saying 'im not going to be around forever' normally SISU say were not for sale......
Maybe a change in their stance
Exactly though, her previous stance has always been 'were not going anywhere and are not for sale'I did think that. Perhaps it could well be a 'call to action' tactic to draw in further investors or perhaps a buyer. That really would be a complete u-turn from her previous stance if that's the case though.
Not usually. There are different types of bond but the most common is fixed interest.
The issuer, with their advisers, decide what the interest rate will be (it's called the coupon). Let's say 6.5% as you say. It then gets sold into the Primary Market. Depending on demand, buyers may not pay 100 for each bond - but the par value is 100 and that's what you get back at the end.
Every six months (say - it can be more or less frequent), the coupon is paid. In our example £3.25 every six months. It's not compounded.
At the end (the redemption date) you get your £100 par value + a final £3.25 coupon. This is how government bonds (called gilts) work.
But there can also be floating coupons. So, for example, the bond pays a coupon of 6 months LIBOR + 3.35%, which is set by looking at the 6 month LIBOR rate every six months. Or zero coupon bonds (called bills usually) which pay no interest but are sold at a discount. These are usually shorter term (say 1 year). So you buy a bill for £97 and a year later you get £100 back.
All bonds are also traded in the secondary market too - so there is a market price and you can sell before the end.
It is possible to get compounded coupons - these are called step-up bonds. But they are much less common - this is because the money isn't paid out frequently and hence the buyer has an increasing amount of credit risk to the issuer - so usually they would expect a higher coupon to reflect this increased risk.
Drowning people will grab anything to try and survive,only a 1000 STs sold, we are just 6 weeks away from St Andrews which will cost the business shed loads. I still think we will kick -off at the Ricoh.
I still have hope we will be starting at the ricoh too! It makes perfect sense as all parties are going to lose out....However Sisu can't agree to wasps wanting us to cover all the legals as it could bankrupt usDrowning people will grab anything to try and survive,only a 1000 STs sold, we are just 6 weeks away from St Andrews which will cost the business shed loads. I still think we will kick -off at the Ricoh.
I’m referring to the retail bonds issued which are due to mature in 2022. No links/evidence, just a hunch. The long-lease acts as security over the bonds issued, meaning if they fail the asset that will be used to repay investors is the sale of the long-lease. If SISU have bought into these bonds (as they are now trading at c.10% down on issue) there is a chance they may be able to negotiate with the ‘fund manager’ to take on the lease for use rather than sale.
All depends on how much they invest down that route - or whether it’s something they’ve even explored. I may be completely wrong. The trades are there to see on the LSE website. With the negative publicity (i.e. state aid claims, auditor resigning, FCA investigation) I’d imagine a lot of serious investors will be spooked and may be after a sale.
Of course not, thats what the sticking point will be though as wasps know they have the upper hand in the short term.... Only hope for us is that the complaint is in our favour and bankrupts wasps giving us the ricohSo CCFC should indemnify Wasps / CCC if any of them are forced to have to pay anything because of them doing something wrong?
I thought this as well. People houses are burgled all the time. Also just read the Sky Sports story and enjoyed the quote about how Mark Robins had said he wanted a nice pitch to play on, almost implies Robins supported the move to St Andrews.Is she implying that her house break in has something to do with the CCFC/Wasps/CCC situation...it certainly sounds like it ?
Chances are, the break in was just another bog standard burglary of a wealthy family, which has nothing to do with the current situation.
The fact she mentions her children makes the subject very emotive, and garners her/SISU some sympathy.
I can't help feeling that she is trying to make out that she/SISU are the victims in this entire decade old saga
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?