Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
What the manager THINKS. Doesn't mean that's how it'll work out. James could have an absolutely mare for all we know right now.
No we’re talking about who offers more sheaf or James it’s clear what the manager thinks compared to a lot on here who think sheaf is better and has stats to match etc etc
Yes I do want him to do wel my point is James it better robins also sees it this way to 1 bring James here in first place 2 pick him over sheafYou WANT him to be bad?
I want all our players to do well no matter if I like them or not because it benefits the club.
You either need a dictionary or a bump to the head.
So do you and the rest of the sheaf fans think robins has got it wrong ? Sheaf is better than James ?What the manager THINKS. Doesn't mean that's how it'll work out. James could have an absolutely mare for all we know right now.
“My desire is Sheaf isn’t good enough” means you want him to be bad. That’s what those words together mean.Yes I do want him to do wel my point is James it better robins also sees it this way to 1 bring James here in first place 2 pick him over sheaf
it’s not rocket science just admit you was wrong I was right
Said it before people don’t see it as it’s the little things he helps us with we seem more solid with him took me a while to see it
We need to be getting ourselves out of this deal some how,we need better use of budgets
“My desire is Sheaf isn’t good enough” means you want him to be bad. That’s what those words together mean.
So robins prefers his loan signing over super sheaf who’s got all these amazing stats you lot are daft seems me and robins see it the same
Sheaf has precense at times it’s needed but to say sheaf offers more than James is a jokeBy that logic Shipley is better now than O Hare
Sheaf has precense at times it’s needed but to say sheaf offers more than James is a joke
If max plays well today let’s hope you can give him some credit
My desire is sheaf isn’t good enough yet and the manager also sees this
Weird the man with all the stats didn’t start or even replace James heySheaf has makes more passes and tackles more of which are successful than any other midfielder
Yeah it is weird. Same bloke starts Shipley over O’Hare.Weird the man with all the stats didn’t start or even replace James hey
I don’t think anyone will argue O’Hare needed a breakYeah it is weird. Same bloke starts Shipley over O’Hare.
So do you and the rest of the sheaf fans think robins has got it wrong ? Sheaf is better than James ?
No mate O’Hare needed a rest What’s robins choices to replace him ?If you'd actually checked I've stated I'm uncertain about Sheaf at this moment in time (but may well be a decent addition over time as he learns how to play league rather than U23) and felt James was a decent experienced addition to cover for Kelly while he was injured.
Point was you were stating that pre-game James playing was the right decision and obviously the better player using only the fact MR picked him as proof. Shipley played ahead of O'Hare - so I assume that was also the right decision and he's now a better player because that's the decision MR made?
Just cos MR picked him doesn't prove it's the right decision - only proof of that can come during the game. As it was he scored which does seem to vindicate the decision but also for much of the game it seemed like Kelly and James were treading on each others boots and we had two players doing one role.
No mate O’Hare needed a rest What’s robins choices to replace him ?
My point is if robins fancies sheaf why did he sign James,Why does sheaf not come on when James goes off to me it looks like he don’t have confidence in sheaf and prefers the man he drafted in in January when Kelly was injured...quick one why didn’t sheaf replace James today ?
So what do you think was the best way to use the jan budget ? On a holding player or a striker who can get us out of trouble ?So if in a future game Sheaf plays ahead of James you'll be taking that as proof Sheaf is better?
James was brought in to cover Kelly's role in terms of experience and leadership. MR clearly wanted to see how james and Kelly would play together - could bring a very stable midfield allowing us to be more attacking. Today they arguably tripped over each other quite a bit.
Did well to last seven days tbfLiterally 7 days apart.
There's a reason nobody takes your opinions seriously.
I'm not really sure what point you're trying to make and I'm not sure you are eitherWeird the man with all the stats didn’t start or even replace James hey
James offers more than sheafI'm not really sure what point you're trying to make and I'm not sure you are either
The point of being a repetitive bell-end?I'm not really sure what point you're trying to make and I'm not sure you are either
Robins seems to agree tho as sheaf just sits out most weeksThe point of being a repetitive bell-end?
Not heard this before from you, fancy repeating it four dozen times?Robins seems to agree tho as sheaf just sits out most weeks
Robins seems to agree tho as sheaf just sits out most weeks
Agree with which one of your views? You say both.Robins seems to agree tho as sheaf just sits out most weeks
His ctrl+v keys must be worn out.Agree with which one of your views? You say both.
Would play sheaf over Kelly personally.
We have an obligation to buy if he plays a certain amount of games and we stay upThe lad has more to give. Does anyone know if the situation is we are obliged to buy? Or is there a break clause in the agreement?
We have an obligation to buy if he plays a certain amount of games and we stay up
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?