The most common line of argument about SISU’s ‘investment’ is about the money Robins has been able to spend on transfers. This would be because there has been no investment in off-field areas, for example a new ground which has been in the pipeline since 2013. Or how about a brand new training ground? Youth facilities? Nope. Those in charge of day to day running have a budget to work off and they do their best with it.
When we make losses it is tacked on to the considerable debt we owe them. Again, are all ‘investments’ held as charges over the club? Our income dictates what we spend. Not SISU.
We can play academic Top Trumps if you like but I think you might come out worse...