Well it's so easy to pull them apart as they're riddled with inconsistency.What I'm alluding to is that what you say in your social group of like minded people is different to positing something on a public forum for all to read including those who might be directly affected.
It's so unlike you to disagree with me and pull my posts apart. Shocked.
Nope wrong again. I've said private is different to public. I'm sure you get that but as always being deliberately obtuse... or perhaps you really are that 'dense'Well it's so easy to pull them apart as they're riddled with inconsistency.
I mean you're happy to joke about a serial rapist who imprisons his daughter for years in a cellar, but a cancer sufferer is too far. How ridiculous. You're either just doing that to be awkward, or you just want to argue with someone for the hell of it because nobody could be that dense.
I think just a banning would suffice. Like you say, it could be opening a tin of worms.It's a horrible thing to say, but £750 fine?
We're on very dodgy ground here.
I mean one of those Wednesday idiots did nothing more than laugh at his stupid mate. Where does this end?
Nope, you made an explicit contrast between Friwell(?) or Shipman, and Bradley or the Philpotts. You then added public.Nope wrong again. I've said private is different to public. I'm sure you get that but as always being deliberately obtuse... or perhaps you really are that 'dense'
Huw Edwards
Edit: sorry I thought it was already next week
But this is a puboic forum. What you say in private is fine, but why do you expect not to be challenged?fs please put me on ignore. I never reply to your posts unless you quote mine. We never agree on any subject and that pleases me, but I'd rather we simply didn't engage.
Searching my post history now. You sad little man. Yes a joke about a living disgraced bbc tv presenter is the sameApparently this is OK on the Death List thread though? I mean... isn't the line just being drawn on what *you* find funny? Isn't this quite a low for the forum?
Huw Edwards 20-year battle with his mental health
Edwards (pictured as a boy with his father), who is accused of paying a teenager £35,000 in return for explicit photographs, said his depression left him unable to get out of bed.www.dailymail.co.uk
A jopke about mental health and mocking the fact they might die? it's sick and appalling... but not to you apparently. You can say what you want, but others can't?Searching my post history now. You sad little man. Yes a joke about a living disgraced bbc tv presenter is the same
That's your interpretation. Pls fk off. I'm done, you can have the last word if you feel you must.A jopke about mental health and mocking the fact they might die? it's sick and appalling... but not to you apparently. You can say what you want, but others can't?
That's where we're at, isn't it?
Oh, and I remembered it, didn't have to search for it hard as it stuck out, it stuck out, and it affected. But I didn't feel the need to call out a new low for attention.
Not going to even apologise? Makes you lower than the people you're deciding are low really.That's your interpretation. Pls fk off. I'm done, you can have the last word if you feel you must.
Ah a poo emoji, a fine way of showing contrition.Not going to even apologise? Makes you lower than the people you're deciding are low really.
You wipe your arse with £750 anywayI remember some people getting angry when I made some joke about the McCanns
Rob is the worst of the worstNot going to even apologise? Makes you lower than the people you're deciding are low really.
Haven't even got to the other bits yet... Point being, we all have inconistsencies, we all do things others find offensive at times.Rob is the worst of the worst
Me too, my suggestion that they may have been involved in her disappearance or even death was not well received at work.I remember some people getting angry when I made some joke about the McCanns
This i sit, the only frankly dangerous and worrying thing is the police getting involvedI don't think there is any definitive answer really is there and I think timing can be crucial too.
I remember the Lord Mountbatten joke back in the 70's and I also remember actually telling that joke, but I didn't tell it at the time, straight after it happened. So that is a major factor.
I get the point of being free to tell a joke, but in the Bradley Lowery incident, that doesn't seem to be a joke at all. Just done to mock, offend and wind opposition fans up.
I don't like jokes about kids with cancer for sure anyway and think I would always find that offensive, but I get that we are all different.
For me, I can clearly see the Philpott one as a joke, but hate the fact the subject matter is kids being burnt to death. The Sheff Weds one just seems intent on mocking only.
As I say, there is no definitive answer. You can't lock people up though. That's dodgy ground for sure.
if someone says his mate has been a bellend for posting pictures of himself at a game during covid he will lose his shit thoughHaven't even got to the other bits yet...
I mean hell, I even did an offensive jokes that we used to say thread. Time makes them softer, but they're just as bad at the time... yet child-me was quite happy to say them(!) My mate Rob totally missed the point of it though. tbf he doesn't need an excuse to make an offensive joke in public himself.if someone says his mate has been a bellend for posting pictures of himself at a game during covid he will lose his shit though
I remember some people getting angry when I made some joke about the McCanns
/resists urge to make obvious offensive joke!Hope you told them to get lost
/resists urge to make obvious offensive joke!
Too subtle(!)I thought that’s what I’d failed to do!
Yeah, but owls are fair game.Someone joked about raping my owl once....
Well done for closing the circle to owls on a Sheffield Wednesday threadYeah, but owls are fair game.
Did it’s eyes bulge ?Someone joked about raping my owl once....
I’ve only known him 20 years
Made his head spin....Did it’s eyes bulge ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?