skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Sorry. I thought you were sure that the issue was what the guarantors had paid. So assumed you must have known of a link to be so sure.
Isn't that what the fl are meant to be deciding? If they aren't deemed related then full amount paid?
Sorry. I thought you were sure that the issue was what the guarantors had paid. So assumed you must have known of a link to be so sure.
Why does anyone care what ACL are paid? They are nothing to do with the club.
The sooner SISU/ACL/CCC are gone the better. The affection so many have for ACL is fucking daft.
Isn't that why it was being questioned in the first place and that we are waiting for the FL to decide if it is linked or not? If they decide it isn't then they pay it all, if somehow they feel it is linked to what they said the original money was for then they will work it out.
So in your opinion what's the link?
The affection is for the club. The payment to ACL is a barrier in the club returning. Therefore it needs paying. Is that too simple for you?
Why does anyone care what ACL are paid? They are nothing to do with the club.
The sooner SISU/ACL/CCC are gone the better. The affection so many have for ACL is fucking daft.
I agree, on the other hand you could see that ACL are a barrier in the club returning so they should go? If they handed it over to SISU for 50p then the club would be back, so ACL is also a barrier?
The way you speak / post and the impression it gives is that the club should do anything ACL say to get us back, which is what got us in a big mess in the first place isn't it? Sorry if that impression is wrong.
On the other hand it could be said that SISU won't pay the full amount because they believe some money has been paid for the same thing (I have no idea if it has or not) and it is down to the FL to decide as they set the demand anyway. If it is linked then why should SISU pay a bill that has been paid? I don't think they should, the same as I don't think ACL should give things away for 50p. It wouldn't take long to decide if it is linked or not, so it is simple isn't it? "Pay up the full amount you dicks it isn't linked, stop talking rubbish" or "pay £xxxx amount".
I didn't say ACL did say it, that is why I said that FL set the amount and it has been disputed so it is waiting on the FL to decide?
I was just giving you an example of the other barriersNot sure why you are trying to have silly little digs?
I didn't say ACL did say it, that is why I said that FL set the amount and it has been disputed so it is waiting on the FL to decide?
I was just giving you an example of the other barriersNot sure why you are trying to have silly little digs?
So just to be clear, what would your attitude be if the FL said the full £590K should be paid to ACL regardless of the Robinson/McGinnity payments & SISU/ARVO disputed the amount. Who would be putting up barriers then?
I agree, SISU may well owe ACL say £290k and the guarantors the £300k.
Don't you think then that if it's going to cost sisu £590k regardless they may as well pay that to ACL so the whole £590k hurdle is done and dusted and here's the novel part, instead of SISU and ACL arguing about it the guarantors and ACL can argue about it and it doesn't effect the club moving forward one iota. Too simple?
You're having a laugh mate.....the council tax payers will see none of that cash re-invested.....it'll go straight in CCCs back pocket....blah blah blah..
Something to do with CCC/ACL owning a stadium in Coventry? FFS.Why does anyone care what ACL are paid? They are nothing to do with the club.
The sooner SISU/ACL/CCC are gone the better. The affection so many have for ACL is fucking daft.
This is obviously money coming out of the club and not in remember...
I hope they dont appeal but i think they will, the appeal normally drops in last minute when you think it is all safe. To what that appeal will solve is a different question.
So if ACL said they would need 10 billion dollars as the barriers wouldn't come down?
I agree courst cases should be dropped and money owed should be paid, but no reason they can't all stop being dicks and at least meet and talk about it and have conditions and terms before things can progress rather than both hiding behind waiting for the FL to make up their mind.
I am not saying anything should be signed, but they can at least talk about it and then both discuss the things that need to happen before the wheels start turning.
Thing is (as far as I know) they haven't said that they're wanting 10bn to talk just the money that the footballing authorities and the judge have said that they're owed. The problem is that Sisu are entitled to appeal against the decision not to allow them to appeal and seem intent on doing so. At the same time as ACL are entirely within their rights to say no talks with legals still in the offing as they appear to be doing.
Sisu don't (to my mind) want to drop the legals because this is the last serious hold that they have over ACL/Coventry council. The council/ACL apparently don't want to start talks with anything hanging over them. That isn't unreasonable given that they will have to put money aside to cover the potential cost of these legals, which could be better used elsewhere and not tied up waiting for a potential legal case that may or may not happen.
Why weren't ACL bothered about legals When they made their infamous offer via the football league? I'm sure the JR process was happening then.
Also I thought the footballing authorities are meeting on the 7th to confirm what is owed. This has nothing to do with the judge as ACL have no legal recourse regarding this money.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?