So that makes the type of organisation who rides roughshod over culture of clubs ideal for us now then.They wouldn't be allowed to in England - FA rejects Hull City application to change club’s name to Hull Tigers
Leipzig aren’t Red Bull Leipzig either. The name has changed to RasenBallsport.They wouldn't be allowed to in England - FA rejects Hull City application to change club’s name to Hull Tigers
Great, that's alright then.Leipzig aren’t Red Bull Leipzig either. The name has changed to RasenBallsport.
What would change? The badge, stadium name and colour of our away kit?So that makes the type of organisation who rides roughshod over culture of clubs ideal for us now then.
And there never try and change that, nope.
It's like some don't learn from SISU or Wasps, and want to hear no evil
RB Leipzig are one of the most hated clubs in GermanySalzburg and Leipzig seem to be doing quite well for themselves
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But quite successfulRB Leipzig are one of the most hated clubs in Germany
I mean why do we need to be liked by other fans? I’m not sure MK Dons fans really care about anyone else’s opinionRB Leipzig are one of the most hated clubs in Germany
Well ideally the Brentford owner I guess. Someone who is rich and only interested in the club
In fairness Jimmy Hill tried to change this club's name to Coventry Talbot in the 80sSo that makes the type of organisation who rides roughshod over culture of clubs ideal for us now then.
And there never try and change that, nope.
It's like some don't learn from SISU or Wasps, and want to hear no evil
Every club in the PL to some extent is reliant on the TV dealHe is only interested in the club if it is making money. Watch what happens when they are relegated.
There model is not sustainable long term. Brentford is another Bournemouth (in terms of fanbase and opportunity to increase revenue) albeit with a different cash injection and investment approach.
Whist you have to admire there success and agree there "ownership model" is a big step up from SISU it is sadly not sustainable in the PL.
The model only works with TV revenues
So you don’t think much will come of this? Shame.Think the can might have started to be kicked
It could be a fishing exercise though , to see if anything comes from this.
O’hare injury couldn’t have come at a worse time though
They have a team in Brazil as well that they have done it with, it removes our identity and culture. I would hate a red bull take over unless, they kept all culture and sponsored only, invest their money in taking us up the ranks, but that will never happen so they can fuck offRed Bull have at every club they've taken over.
He may have rebranded us, but we still had our identity and culture, not a fucking shitty energy drink and F1 brand all over us. I would fucking hate that, tastes like cat pissI would hate for RB to take us over and rebrand us but do feel the need to remind people that’s essentially what Jimmy Hill did when he arrived.
What would change? The badge, stadium name and colour of our away kit?
Agree with your comments on RB, horrible stuff. I think our current identity is all Jimmy Hill though, he introduced the sky blue shirt, the sky blues nickname and indeed wrote the original lyrics to the sky blue song and put it to the music of the Eton boating song.He may have rebranded us, but we still had our identity and culture, not a fucking shitty energy drink and F1 brand all over us. I would fucking hate that, tastes like cat piss
Imagine how upset Sunderland fans would get when we start throwing stones on the pitch for the halftime stoning.I want a Saudi so we can have people beheaded in the centre circle at half time.
I want a Saudi so we can have people beheaded in the centre circle at half time.
I want a Saudi so we can have people beheaded in the centre circle at half time.
Did they say the value of the Golden Share was? Did they put a value on it at all when it came to selling a club?I think Sisu have realised that they can’t take the club any further forward. Realistically, they won’t get a massive price for us either. Listening to the price of football podcast last week, they were saying that on paper you can only value players on what they were purchased for. So in real terms that’s 5-8 million tops. I’m not sure how much the training ground is worth? Maybe 5-6 million. So in essence we’re worth £15m tops and we don’t have the lease for the ground. I can’t see what Sisu’s exit plan is.
I mean why do we need to be liked by other fans? I’m not sure MK Dons fans really care about anyone else’s opinion
For Sisu, it's a bit like doing the lottery every week. You know your chances of coming out on top long term are close to zero but you can't stop in case your numbers come up next week. Sisy's only hope of getting their money back is if we somehow get to the premier league. Hence their comment about third party investment.I think Sisu have realised that they can’t take the club any further forward. Realistically, they won’t get a massive price for us either. Listening to the price of football podcast last week, they were saying that on paper you can only value players on what they were purchased for. So in real terms that’s 5-8 million tops. I’m not sure how much the training ground is worth? Maybe 5-6 million. So in essence we’re worth £15m tops and we don’t have the lease for the ground. I can’t see what Sisu’s exit plan is.
It’s worth no physical value what so ever. you can’t list it in the accounts as an asset. We all know it’s worth something in the long run but you can’t list it as an asset because the EFL can revoke it at any time.Did they say the value of the Golden Share was? Did they put a value on it at all when it came to selling a club?
I think your right. Ithink Sisu said that they had pumped £30m in to the club over the years and they want this money back. They're not going to sell up now when we’re worth maybe half of that amount and no stadium ownership. I can’t see how a third party investment is going to help in obtaining the lease either. Wasps or the council will not deal with the 3rd party if they are on the board of the football club.For Sisu, it's a bit like doing the lottery every week. You know your chances of coming out on top long term are close to zero but you can't stop in case your numbers come up next week. Sisy's only hope of getting their money back is if we somehow get to the premier league. Hence their comment about third party investment.
I'll phone them both up and askI mean why do we need to be liked by other fans? I’m not sure MK Dons fans really care about anyone else’s opinion
It is a bit weird how people talk about the identity and how it'd be sacrilege to change it when most revere the man who changed our identity in the 1960's and consider him our finest manager. We're not Singers anymore. Or the Bantams. Our first kit was black. The badge changes subtly all the time as looks nothing like our original badge.Agree with your comments on RB, horrible stuff. I think our current identity is all Jimmy Hill though, he introduced the sky blue shirt, the sky blues nickname and indeed wrote the original lyrics to the sky blue song and put it to the music of the Eton boating song.
Man Utd are one of the most hated here. Chelsea were after getting the Russian billions, ditto Man City with the Abu Dhabi cash. Newcastle aren't exactly popular after the Saudi's and that'll only grow if the start buying their way to the top.RB Leipzig are one of the most hated clubs in Germany
He did, and is renowned as one of the worst chairmen we've had for his decisions.In fairness Jimmy Hill tried to change this club's name to Coventry Talbot in the 80s
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
It nearly happened when Mowbray was here, they may come in again and make an enquiry
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?