If this actually happens all the Cheltenham fans should be worried.
SISU's plan for owning us was to put a few quid in the pot, get promoted, use the money to buy the stadium and then flip us for a significant profit. Once we didn't get promoted it all fell apart.
Depends on if the football governance bill goes anywhere on the last point as hopefully clubs will be much more protected then Bury or Chester were.Strange choice. As bad as they ran us, we always had potential and a fan base. With all due respect to Cheltenham they have neither. Expectations would be of course lower, but the only upside I can see for SISU is another place to bury debts in a web of financial misery. As a club they should be fearful as if they can do what they did to us, then a someone the size of Cheltenham could disappear without a trace and the footballing world would barely notice. There was never enough fight from the outside to let clubs like Bury and Chester go, even with their years of history. Even worse the MK Dons / Wimbledon fiasco. Poor Cheltenham wouldn't stand a chance.
Former Coventry City owner Joy Seppala linked with takeover of League Two club
Could former Coventry City owner and Sisu Capital boss Joy Seppala be plotting a way back into football?www.coventrytelegraph.net
Interesting one really
Cynic in you would guess the land Cheltenham's ground lies on would be worth a lot of money to any property developers and they might promise them an imaginary stadium as well
Or you could flip the coin and believe maybe they feel towards they made a success of owning a club and want another go, get Cheltenham up and flip them over to a profit
I'm glad they are gone but intrigued to see how they go about owning a club without the politics and soap opera that came with ours
At least Robins has a job when he gets the bullet from StokeStrange choice. As bad as they ran us, we always had potential and a fan base. With all due respect to Cheltenham they have neither. Expectations would be of course lower, but the only upside I can see for SISU is another place to bury debts in a web of financial misery. As a club they should be fearful as if they can do what they did to us, then a someone the size of Cheltenham could disappear without a trace and the footballing world would barely notice. There was never enough fight from the outside to let clubs like Bury and Chester go, even with their years of history. Even worse the MK Dons / Wimbledon fiasco. Poor Cheltenham wouldn't stand a chance.
“Fuck the wasps fuck sisu fuck the council and Cheltenham too”Looking forward to getting them away in the cup.
Some more renditions of 'We Want SISU Out' for old times sake.
Yep, it's about time Coventry fans took a good look in the mirror and took responsibility for their club nearly being driven into oblivion.Ihearye wrote: ↑We certainly seem to have a few folk on here who must know a lot about this company SiSU, to have such a low opinion of them. I tend to wait to hear what people have to say and then make my own mind up about them. As opposed to listening to a bunch of fans whose club has had years in the doldrums and seem to have blamed everyone but themselves for it
Yeah he’s got a point, I remember when we voted to stop paying rent, and decided to become a Milton Keynes tribute act in Northampton and Birmingham.Going by the comments of this prick I hope Sisu do take them over
Yep, it's about time Coventry fans took a good look in the mirror and took responsibility for their club nearly being driven into oblivion.
I already have and by the way Cheltenham don't own their own ground.Who's going to tell the Cheltenham fans.
As someone posted on another thread, they apparently own a 22 acre training ground. If true that land must be valuableSurely the profit margins with a club like Cheltenham are even smaller? Which begs the question as to why they would want to get involved in a football club again?
If they were responsible for investing my money and suggested buying into a football club which, with all due respect, has limited potential I would certainly be questioning it!!!
That'll be it then!!As someone posted on another thread, they apparently own a 22 acre training ground. If true that land must be valuable
It's clearly an ironic response to a silly comment about how people don't know enough about Sisu to judge them.Going by the comments of this prick I hope Sisu do take them over
Yep, it's about time Coventry fans took a good look in the mirror and took responsibility for their club nearly being driven into oblivion.
And in a dreadful mix-up is shot round the back of the stables and sent to the glue factoryThe challenge will be when they relocate to the racecourse over a rent dispute & their star striker is put out for the season by a loose horse!
Not true, some of us like football in Somerset!Depends on if the football governance bill goes anywhere on the last point as hopefully clubs will be much more protected then Bury or Chester were.
Could argue Gloucestershire has a market but if I’m not wrong it’s all Rugby there, same as Somerset.
Surely the profit margins with a club like Cheltenham are even smaller? Which begs the question as to why they would want to get involved in a football club again?
If they were responsible for investing my money and suggested buying into a football club which, with all due respect, has limited potential I would certainly be questioning it!!!
Aye-bed sheets at the ready.Looking forward to getting them away in the cup.
Some more renditions of 'We Want SISU Out' for old times sake.
Yeah he’s got a point, I remember when we voted to stop paying rent, and decided to become a Milton Keynes tribute act in Northampton and Birmingham.
What a twat
It is only a test to exclude outright criminality and undue influence. There is nothing to restrict how a club should be run, though there are rules about moving the location of a club which MK were able to circumvent.Of the fit and proper persons test is for anybody it’s surely owners who have already taken one club to the brink.
- Purpose:
The ODT aims to prevent individuals who are not "fit" or "proper" from owning or managing football clubs, ensuring the integrity and reputation of the sport.
- Who it Applies To:
The test applies to prospective owners of more than 30% of a club's shares and to directors of football clubs.
- Key Elements:
The test assesses an individual's integrity, honesty, financial soundness, and, in the case of directors, competence.
- Disqualifying Events:
The test includes a checklist of "disqualifying events" that would rule out a potential owner or director, such as:
- Being disqualified by law from being a director under the Companies Disqualification Act 1986.
- Having an unspent conviction for a dishonesty-based offence.
- Breaches of key football regulations, such as match-fixing.
- Being banned by a sporting or professional body.
- Implementation:
The EFL and the FA have their own versions of the test, with the EFL's test detailed in Appendix 3 of its regulations and the Premier League's in section F of its handbook.
- Verification:
While the test is primarily a self-declaration, the EFL carries out significant work to verify the information provided.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?