Chrisbaker85PUSB
New Member
ACL said the rent would be 400k but CCFC would have access to matchday costs which would drag the amount down to 150k that's how I understood it.
Just wish I remember who first leaked it on here the were clearly in the know.
Didn't he say a net rent of 150k, so instead of rent of 150k with CCFC having access to the income streams it's actually a rent of 400k with access to income streams. You also have to question why if ACL think 150k is a fair rent they are insisting on over £1m in arrears. Works out a lot more than £150k a year!
Interesting that people are happy to believe any vague statement ACL come out with but rubbish any comment from SISU. sure both of them are putting their own spin on things so why believe one over another?
Clearly numbers are not your strong point, it is pretty simple, and factual. SISU just do not want to pay, the net costs to CCFC are £150k. History will prove this when the club sadly evaporate.Clearly you have confused the stories you are hearing. IF it was 150k you don't think SISU would accept that?
People you have to stop puting 2 and 2 together and making 6.
Clearly numbers are not your strong point, it is pretty simple, and factual. SISU just do not want to pay, the net costs to CCFC are £150k. History will prove this when the club sadly evaporate.
Debt order freezes Sky Blues bank account
* ACL will go back to the court in May for final order
* ACL claims final offer would reduce current the current £1.2million annual rent package to just £150,000
ACL claimed the package would effectively reduce the current £1.2million annual rent package to just £150,000 paid by the club in total matchday costs while the club remains in Division One.
It definitely wasn't 150k. Whoever said that is wrong.
Also, the F&B deal is far more complex and skewed towards the council.
This council has so much to answer for, not just ccfc but the city in general. They're local authority with too many egos playing politics.
Why more people haven't questioned the original tesco land deal surprises me, the club were naive and the council knew what it was doing. The state aid argument is littered with unanswered questions.
I genuinely wouldn't trust our council in anything they say or do.
skybluescotland said it! He is right most of the time and I think he has good contacts
It was a doctor and the chief executive of Coventry city council
Who was in the meeting.
My guess is he was right.
I am sure Doctor Shipman had a brain.Unless it was a honorary Doctorate I would suggest it means he has a brain and unlikely to have got confused.
As the chief executive of the council if he public ally lies and is proven to have done so. His career is up in smoke.
TF? .......
I just want to see the minutes from the meeting, that will confirm who said what. But noone seems to want to disclose them.
I think PWKH said on the radio yesterday that he wanted to release his notes from the meeting, but lawyers stopped them - something about a flurry of legal letters warning that they would face a legal fight that would cost £100,000 even if they were ultimately proved right in the end!
In my opinion some of the civil laws in this country can have an incredibly chilling effect on free speech, even when someone wants to tell what they believe to be the truth.
You're right Don public servants have never lied or bent the truth before.....
Wonder why we will never know the truth until the minutes are released, the war of words will continue. The only losers are the fans, nothing new there then.
Unless it was a honorary Doctorate I would suggest it means he has a brain and unlikely to have got confused.
As the chief executive of the council if he public ally lies and is proven to have done so. His career is up in smoke.
TF? .......
I just want to see the minutes from the meeting, that will confirm who said what. But noone seems to want to disclose them.
I never said that - my point it both sides are politicking, telling us what they want us to hear.Yes all the ACL staff have got together and decided to make up that TF and the two directors agreed to the deal and the reneged,
It's part of ACL's evil plan to discredit SISU and as TF puts it bully them into a deal.
I can just see it now.
I never said that - my point it both sides are politicking, telling us what they want us to hear.
We don't know the ins and outs of the deal.
I am on neither side, I just want what is best for the football club.
People dont believe a word sisu say because they've bullshitted us inside out for the last 5+ years,acl haven't.
But from the information in the CT it appears the truth has been bent from ACLs side. It appears that rent was offers at £400k not £150k and this is from ACLs press release.
They were allowed full access to the figures confirmed by Peter.
It is good to have a debate which brings out both sides iof the argument
Keep it up Grendel.
Unfortunately your points always seems to trace back to source ...... TF's lies
Are you happy that TF shook hands with all three directors.
Said we have a deal then walked away got his mind changed replied with an email threatening to build a new football stadium?
Because whatever the exact figure was in that meeting TF was very happy with it and agreed to it.
Wonder why we will never know the truth until the minutes are released, the war of words will continue. The only losers are the fans, nothing new there then.
You don't know for a fact that things ACL haven't twisted things or lied about things in the past.. In truth I don't trust them, the council or SISU
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?