SkyblueBri
Well-Known Member
I thought they had 7 days to apply for an appeal, so it should have been done by now, does anyone know if it as?
They have requested leave of appeal SBB which means they are requesting an appeal and its down to the original judge Justice Hickenbottom to grant it or not.
That is to be decided on the 14th July as with the costs. so a week today we should know more I believe.
Did I say appeal enough times?
Ah, that's it. KOK has it sorted. I seem to recall that if the Judge rejects it, SISU can the put in another appeal which goes to an appeal board, who then decide whehwer they have case for an appeal
Did I say appeal enough times?
Yes if the appeal is rejected as expected then sisu can appeal to the court of appeal within 21 days I think it is. Sadly none of these aims are realistic and just worthless and designed to distress acl if that's what they do.
Its worth taking into account that the JR was only sanctioned on appeal and with such a damning verdict then sadly this is waste of everyone's time and money.
Yes, it's a bit like one of those cases where an innocent person is accused on flimsy evidence and when acquitted the papers scream "how did it get to court in the first place?" (Corrie Kev looking at you) .... there, I've gone and said it now, just watch the court of appeal overturn the judge's ruling!!
Or...one of those cases where a guilty person is taken to court albeit that the evidence is flimsy. They are acquitted but the papers then scream that this means that the accuser is a liar. Not commenting on any particular case of course just that our justice system, being adversarial, sometimes encourages the media towards hysterical over-reaction either way.
Yes, it's a bit like one of those cases where an innocent person is accused on flimsy evidence and when acquitted the papers scream "how did it get to court in the first place?" (Corrie Kev looking at you) .... there, I've gone and said it now, just watch the court of appeal overturn the judge's ruling!!
Or...one of those cases where a guilty person is taken to court albeit that the evidence is flimsy. They are acquitted but the papers then scream that this means that the accuser is a liar. Not commenting on any particular case of course just that our justice system, being adversarial, sometimes encourages the media towards hysterical over-reaction either way.
Anyone who has followed the Ricoh saga ought to know who is in the right, regardless of legal/procedural technicalities
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?