I would take playing in yellow and black just to taste a bit of success for a change as I'm only 16. There would be different answers for different generationsI stole this from Facebook and the question asked what you would rather out of the following options:
- That Coventry were still owned by sisu and retained the colour sky blue in their identity (yes I know our kit is practically white now but you get what I mean)
- Or we are taken over by wasps but they change our colours to yellow and black
It's a totally hypothetical scenario I was just interested to hear your thoughts so what would you rather?
I would take playing in yellow and black just to taste a bit of success for a change as I'm only 16. There would be different answers for different generations
Wouldn't be the first time we changed our kit colour.I'm only 17 myself but I don't think I could stand changing from sky blue, the kit this year is bad enough
It would all rest on how long Sisu would want to keep the club for. I couldn't deal with another say 20 years of them clowns. Would still go and watch but I would slowly lose all interest in the club.I'm only 17 myself but I don't think I could stand changing from sky blue, the kit this year is bad enough
Not really. The odd mention but they're known as 'The Blues'.Wouldn't be the first time we changed our kit colour.
Most of the press think that Man City are the Sky Blues
Maybe we could have skyblue as the away kit just like wasps do
Sky Blue WASPS has a ring to it100% Sisu and stay as sky blues
1) sisu aren't going to be around forever
2) changing to yellow and black is huge step in refranchising, it wouldn't be long until our nickname would become wasps
3) sky blue is part of our tradition, brought in by Jimmy hill, we're called tje sky blues our club song is "play up sky blues"
4) getting taken over by wasps doesn't necessarily mean good times will roll. Rugby is their no. 1 priority and you can achieve a lot for significantly cheaper than football. Even wasos biggest fan Italia thinks they would just run us break even in league one if they took us over.
5) , yes things are shit now, but poor feel sorry for us. If we get bought by wasos and they change our kit completely to move in line with theirs, we'd become the laughing stock of football
6) tradition and identity is hugely important
I'd just about stomach it if wasps took over, but if they changed the kit and/or name, thats me done.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
The only thing you are worried about is a change of location but you are happy for a change of name and image? Our club should and will not ever change it'sI'm 60 plus and would be quite happy for us to rebrand under the Wasps regime. SISU are taking us nowhere. Yes, I've been a supporter since 1966 and have only ever known us as The Sky Blues but I'm not so stuck in my ways to not take on board a change of image and maybe a change of name. The only thing I'm worried about is a change of location.....
I think it really is.Is this thread really happening?
Just when I didn't think it could get any worse...
They won't take over, they're not stupid!Or we are taken over by wasps but they change our colours to yellow and black
When Jimmy Hill was chairman in the late 70s he was seriously looking to change our name from Coventry City to Coventry Talbot. PGS (Puegoet) had taken over from Chrysler and the name Talbot became a brand Puegoet brand name. As PSA sponsored us Hill's idea was to go the whole hog and rename us. If I remember it wasn't universally popular at the time and I think there was resistance from the FA, can't remember the full story. Also at the time he looked towards building a new ground and homed in on the Butts site but it never got out of the starting blocks.
Anyway back to the OP would I change colours, black & gold ? Well I was around when we changed to Sky Blue, don't remember too much fuss at the time. Apart from the Jimmy Hill 5 years and 1987 Sky Blue hasn't been a very lucky or successful colour, one top 6 finish in 47 years !! Gold & black though would have a few on here positively suicidal so with that in mind I'd change.
Not really, our kit at the time was virtually all white with dark blue trim, we had been blue and white quarters for a while but had changed, so yes in a way you are correct dark blue and white was the official colour but as I said when Hill came it was mainly white,When we changed to Sky Blue under Jimmy Hill it was a change from one shade of blue to another, and a change back to a colour we had worn early in our history. The Talbot idea (80s not 70s) was silly, but would not have been nearly as drastic as what is proposed here and would have been temporary given that it was tied to a sponsorship deal.
Changing to yellow - changing the name permanently - you'd effectively have a new club that would be unrecognisable. You'd effectively have a franchise club with no ties to the past. We'd have to ditch the Sky Blue Song, stop referring to ourselves as the SBA, avoid using the term 'come on city'. It would be the end of the club as we know it.
Can't believe I been sucked into this debate
When we changed to Sky Blue under Jimmy Hill it was a change from one shade of blue to another, and a change back to a colour we had worn early in our history. The Talbot idea (80s not 70s) was silly, but would not have been nearly as drastic as what is proposed here and would have been temporary given that it was tied to a sponsorship deal.
Changing to yellow - changing the name permanently - you'd effectively have a new club that would be unrecognisable. You'd effectively have a franchise club with no ties to the past. We'd have to ditch the Sky Blue Song, stop referring to ourselves as the SBA, avoid using the term 'come on city'. It would be the end of the club as we know it.
Can't believe I been sucked into this debate
The story I believe about the change of colour to Sky Blue was a bit of an accident apparently. JH did initiate a colour change to Coventry blue, which is a known shade of blue from our ribbon making history, the same shade as the blue on ribbon island on the Foleshill Road which is darker than Sky Blue, when the new kit arrived it was a lighter shade, we had to use it and started winning and winning well. The nickname Sky Blues was given by the football reporter at the time Derek Henderson who went under the name of Nemo, not sure which game it was but we hammered someone and Nemo used the headline "magnificent sky blues" and it stuck and Hill being clever capitalised on on it commercially . As for increasing support as ever that came from playing well and a bit of success went from an average of about 7/8000 to 25/30k almost overnight. Get a winning team and watchable team it doesn't matter what colour you play in fans will come.I wouldn't be happy about changing. Not sure it would be that easy either given what happened at Hull not so long ago.
Is there any posters on here who are old enough to remember the Jimmy Hill revolution first hand? If there is how was the change of colours etc. accepted back then? Was it universally accepted? Did we lose any supporters over it? We certainly gained supporters, why do you think that was and was this instantaneously?
Ah but that Coventry Blue could have been called sky blue?The story I believe about the change of colour to Sky Blue was a bit of an accident apparently. JH did initiate a colour change to Coventry blue, which is a known shade of blue from our ribbon making history, the same shade as the blue on ribbon island on the Foleshill Road which is darker than Sky Blue, when the new kit arrived it was a lighter shade, we had to use it and started winning and winning well. The nickname Sky Blues was given by the football reporter at the time Derek Henderson who went under the name of Nemo, not sure which game it was but we hammered someone and Nemo used the headline "magnificent sky blues" and it stuck and Hill being clever capitalised on on it commercially . As for increasing support as ever that came from playing well and a bit of success went from an average of about 7/8000 to 25/30k almost overnight. Get a winning team and watchable team it doesn't matter what colour you play in fans will come.
To me it doesnt feel like our club anyway sisu have systematically stripped it of its identity cant imagine how the wimbledon fans must have felt.. admittedly there was inly about 200 of them what we should sing is we want our city back
Not really, our kit at the time was virtually all white with dark blue trim, we had been blue and white quarters for a while but had changed, so yes in a way you are correct dark blue and white was the official colour but as I said when Hill came it was mainly white,
Get out.I would take playing in yellow and black just to taste a bit of success for a change as I'm only 16. There would be different answers for different generations
Yep, all we need to do is to change our shouts from the current 'Come on you yellow-bellied barstards,' to 'Come on you yellows.'Sky blue yellow sounds like a reasonable colour
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?