standupforcity
Well-Known Member
Anyone know what's happening to the seating at the Ricoh? Is it being replaced, or left in case we return next season?
They ARE away. All the time.If I was them id change 1/3rd the seats to yellow, 1/3 to black and then change their away kit to sky blue
They ARE away. All the time.
Keep the faith I always love alway games and it adds a bit of spice to the game!
My daughter doesn’t know yet she is going she will be speechless! The coach the train or whatever it all adds to the day out!
We always play better away from home and it’s a decent pitch!
32,000 seats, more like 2-3 million. Shame McGinnity is no longer with us, his company would knowI doubt they will. What’s the cost? 250-500k?
If we go up Wasps would be begging for ya back. At least that’s what I’m banking on. And another promotion on top of that and we’ll buy the Ricoh.its a great attitude and almost the same as mine. My concern is we can get away with this when we are lower league, but home advantage is a key factor in majority of leagues, especially the higher ones and having aspirations of competing in the championship, if we aren't playing at "home" there, we are at a disadvantage.
From Paul Appleton hopefullyAnd another promotion on top of that and we’ll buy the Ricoh.
If we go up Wasps would be begging for ya back. At least that’s what I’m banking on. And another promotion on top of that and we’ll buy the Ricoh.
MoneyWhy would wasps beg for us to come back knowing their whole house could come crumbling down if ccc lose a court case that our owners have begun ?
Money
And can you please explain to me how that is any different whether we are at St Andrews or at the Ricoh paying them?What they stand to gain in rent / f&b is a drop in the ocean compared to what they stand to lose if the court case goes south.
32,000 seats, more like 2-3 million. Shame McGinnity is no longer with us, his company would know
Why would wasps beg for us to come back knowing their whole house could come crumbling down if ccc lose a court case that our owners have begun ?
@ccfcway no? Nothing?And can you please explain to me how that is any different whether we are at St Andrews or at the Ricoh paying them?
Our owners haven’t begun a court case.Why would wasps beg for us to come back knowing their whole house could come crumbling down if ccc lose a court case that our owners have begun ?
They stand to lose whether they rent to ccfc or not. Let’s move on.What they stand to gain in rent / f&b is a drop in the ocean compared to what they stand to lose if the court case goes south.
As already shown , isnt their priority is to end all litigation ?
So...just to summarise: You don't think Wasps would want us back in a season, despite them losing money, because they won't want us back until we've stopped litigation. You acknowledge now though that actually we have no control over the EC complaint. Now you're saying Wasps wouldn't have us back until SISU stop litigation that they haven't even started yet?Sorry, was working.
I assume in their minds the longer we are away the more chance sisu will consider stopping litigation, I know they can’t stop this one, but civil action hasn’t begun yet either.
So...just to summarise: You don't think Wasps would want us back in a season, despite them losing money, because they won't want us back until we've stopped litigation. You acknowledge now though that actually we have no control over the EC complaint. Now you're saying Wasps wouldn't have us back until SISU stop litigation that they haven't even started yet?
Right
Sorry, was working.
I assume in their minds the longer we are away the more chance sisu will consider stopping litigation, I know they can’t stop this one, but civil action hasn’t begun yet either.
Know where my mate can get one from, please?32,000 of these...
My take is that Wasps are seeking to distress SISU (by distressing their asset, CCFC) in an attempt to win a war of attrition with them. It does seem SISU were willing to sign something that would prevent them taking further litigation bit Wasps also (unreasonably in my view) wanted any effects of a successful EC investigation underwritten by SISU. Wasps would have known this was a deal breaker and so i think they are clearly happy to see CCFC play elsewhere in the hopes it damages SISU more than themselves.So...just to summarise: You don't think Wasps would want us back in a season, despite them losing money, because they won't want us back until we've stopped litigation. You acknowledge now though that actually we have no control over the EC complaint. Now you're saying Wasps wouldn't have us back until SISU stop litigation that they haven't even started yet?
Right
The litigation in the form of the EC complaint cannot be stopped and they it's been acknowledged that they signed an agreement to end litigation against London wasps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?