I assume they elected a new representative for the FSA ?
Yep. Never give up your right to call them out whenever they're out of order.This is the problem. One of their objectives is to be able to have a say in the running of the club. Waging war isn't going to achieve that objective. You can work with the club/owners without giving up the right to be able to criticise them when needed (constructively). That goes for all parties involved in our current issues.
It shouldn't be too hard a guess!!
I assume they elected a new representative for the FSA ?
That was childishGarry Glitter wasn’t available
Mark probably thinks Kalns didn’t either as he wasn’t on the board
Some of the meetings weren't even secret!!!Even more secret meetings with Hoffman and Wasps now then.
He’s only interested in himselfLionel Bird though.
I feel sorry for whoever they roll out to take all of the flack from that prick being the prick he is.
Even more secret meetings with Hoffman and Wasps now then.
Take it you aren't a fan?He’s only interested in himself
They should have been issuing statements pressurising CCC and Wasps going on the radio in the CET organising marches anything but no they get that twat on the board. Give me strengthTake it you aren't a fan?
At a time when seemingly overall the fans seem really United, we get promoted etc. I can't think of anything they could have done that would be that stupid.
Has Neil White not only just joined? Didn't last long did he?!
So Johnson is out but his right hand man Lionel Bird is in...
Come to think of it I’m sure it was supposed to be today but didn’t checkHas Neil White not only just joined? Didn't last long did he?!
Also, the very first line on the article says the meeting was held on Tuesday 3rd August????
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Has Neil White not only just joined? Didn't last long did he?!
Also, the very first line on the article says the meeting was held on Tuesday 3rd August????
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Was it the constant abuse from Nick on twitter that done it?!?!Neil joined the board at the AGM last year and left a few months later.
Bloke couldn't lie straight in bed and hated being found out.Was it the constant abuse from Nick on twitter that done it?!?!
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
tbf Neil's prior experience suggested he was just what they needed to sort their comms out.Was it the constant abuse from Nick on twitter that done it?!?!
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
I'm pretty sure he was a pr expert that wasn't used to people asking questions.tbf Neil's prior experience suggested he was just what they needed to sort their comms out.
His twitter responses soon suggested otherwise!!
He wasn’t on the board at the time, just a rabid anti Sisu member of the audience at the meeting. They forced him to give up his shares don’t you know...A trust should be independent and not take any ‘side’.
From the get go it’s been obvious that the Trust has had an agenda and that agenda at most times has been detrimental to Coventry City Football Club.
Speaks volumes when a board member calls out a fellow skyblue fan as a ‘SISU sympathiser’.
That’s not their role-yes personal opinion has to come into it but not personal attacks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
He wasn’t on the board at the time, just a rabid anti Sisu member of the audience at the meeting. They forced him to give up his shares don’t you know...
No idea. You’re the twitter man, so you must know...,The thing is, as has been shown for ages that people don't need to be on the board. David Johnson was up on the stage preaching about forcing the club into admin and he wasn't on the board.
Certain people will always overpower without actually being on the board.
What's Roger Ellis up to nowadays?
No idea. You’re the twitter man, so you must know...,
Must admit, with Eyles, I thought they had got some sanity on the board, but then Neil popped up and blew that apart. Recent statements were not bad though, so wondered if they had started to change somewhat, but Lionel on the board is a huge backward step.
That has been the case all of the time though. It is as if there's some sort of power struggle or somebody putting the stops on things that we don't see.
It has been the same for years.
Put something promising out that makes sense.
Completely U Turn and go against what was said.
A christmas sing-a-long with all proceeds going to a CCFC museum??At a record store new you pop pickers
Shop
We are currently talking to various suppliers about the possibility of providing all SISU Out merchandise here in the near future. If you have a product which you think would be relevant to the...sisuout.weebly.com
This is the absolute thing. They may have legal status in terms of being an FA recognised Trust, but in terms of communication with the membership they are in the dark ages. They don't even answer emails FFS, have they been to the Bing College of New Technology?This has to be final nail & I think best bet is just to leave the Trust behind.
If Mark & Pete can keep doing what they're doing we're a thousand times more credible than them anyway. Sure they might still get the odd media interview but nobody cares about what they have to say anyway.
They'll rightly get short shrift from the owners too - they chose to back the wrong horse to the detriment of the club they're supposed to support.
Represent themselves & themselves alone.
I like himHe’s full of self opinionated shit.
I applied and got a ticket for this and couldn’t be bothered to go. Now that I hear Lionel Bird got onto the board I’m glad I didn’t go. All he is interested in is what the latest bullshit info he’s found about SISU.
When the reincarnation of the Trust started the intentions were good, the people involved had the future of the club at heart. Unfortunately the club has now taken a back seat actually might be in the boot. Keeping sweet with CCC and Wasps is far more important.
I signed up more people than anyone else to the Trust and I apologise to all of these people for letting you down.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?