I don't know, PM and ask him...
It was a thread criticising the local press I think?
That would have required me to have said everybody's out to get me, wouldn't it.
DON'T do a poll on it !!!!
You seem to constantly be getting irritated by people going off subject within a thread ? But that is something that will never change. Any debate will morph as more people input. As it should. Each person will bring there own perspective that to others will seem irrelevant. Trying to stop that drift in thread content makes you King Kanute-esque. I suggest as moderator you have more important thing to take up your time.
You seem to constantly be getting irritated by people going off subject within a thread ? But that is something that will never change. Any debate will morph as more people input. As it should. Each person will bring there own perspective that to others will seem irrelevant. Trying to stop that drift in thread content makes you King Kanute-esque. I suggest as moderator you have more important thing to take up your time.
I meant I'm the pantomime villain!
Only if its going off topic in a direction he doesn't like.
This thread is like that Brass Eye episode about paedophiles. And I think we just set light to a paediatrician's office.
Ah ok.
you are good at it though
You seem to constantly be getting irritated by people going off subject within a thread ? But that is something that will never change. Any debate will morph as more people input. As it should. Each person will bring there own perspective that to others will seem irrelevant. Trying to stop that drift in thread content makes you King Kanute-esque. I suggest as moderator you have more important thing to take up your time.
To be honest, I have given up with things going off topic and just let them run unless offensive or OTT. Some people will never just understand how forums work
This thread is like that Brass Eye episode about paedophiles. And I think we just set light to a paediatrician's office.
Companies house are probably too busy bullying the small self employed folk that keep this country moving rather than those who have the means to fight back.
COVENTRY City's directors are facing prosecution over the club's unfiled accounts, the Observer can reveal.
Bosses at Companies House are set to fire off a final warning to Sky Blues chiefs Tim Fisher and Mark Labovitch threatening to issue a summons unless the accounts of Coventry City Football (Holdings) Ltd, Sky Blue Sports & Leisure Ltd and Otium Entertainment Group Ltd are not filed soon.
All are over six months late.
But the fish said weeks ago that the accounts were compeleted, signed, and ready for submission. I heard him say it on CWR
So explain to me again why the accounts haven't been filed......
The Otium one is particularly baffling tbf, as there surely can't be anything much odd in their accounts worth holding back on them, being as it's been dormant for god knows how long!
I am thinking they are deliberately holding them back until the admin/liquidation situation is over. Would there be any recourse then ,once all has been dealt with, if the accounts show the assets were moved to leave only the lease in Ltd. So Sisu could liquidate Ltd and terminate the lease?
Not for that long - it was only incorporated in April 2011 !!
Long enough to have filed some particularly boring accounts that say nothing!
If assets were moved to deliberately put them out of the reach of creditors, that would be illegal. Whether the accounts were filed or not, the Serious Fraud Office could still take action to bring the directors to trial for insolvency fraud.
And yet - nothing......
Indeed.
Frankly that raises more questions in my mind than the lack of CCFC accounts. I can see plenty of reasons why they may not have been filed... but struggling here.
And if there's not an obvious answer, that makes me suspicious.
I can come up with a damned fine conspiracy theory, but little in the way of a theory that holds together properly
I normally subscribe to the cock up theory of history rather than the conspiracy version - but as you say, why would they not have filed them.
One phone call to their accountants and a couple of hundred quid to do the necessary -assuming that it was dormant.
Odd.
Not odd really. It fits the pattern of their arrogance and a belief that normal rules of law and socially acceptable behaviour do not apply to them.
It isn't though.
The SISU capital accounts have been filed, after all.
Their original reason for not filing accounts was with the on going rent dispute they could not offer a realistic forcast.
However now they have an agreement to play at Sixfields, they can bolt on the missing forcast....bet they are in the post already...they are in the post aren't they Mr Fisher?
Aaahhh the postman has lost them. Ohhh naughty postman!!
It isn't though.
The SISU capital accounts have been filed, after all.
I am thinking they are deliberately holding them back until the admin/liquidation situation is over. Would there be any recourse then ,once all has been dealt with, if the accounts show the assets were moved to leave only the lease in Ltd. So Sisu could liquidate Ltd and terminate the lease?
'Its all the fault of [any name] back in 1995' 18 years ago....despite Sisu not filing accounts on time year after year....
Is a football clubs accounts that complex? really?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?