sorry mate if that was directed at me my humour is obviously too subtle, sorry if you've gone to effort because of my attempt at a joke.
To be honest, despite his protestations about it being boring. I'd have it on the radio with Eakin or similar and maybe some questions selected from fans and perhaps a fans rep to give right of reply.
Mr Labovitch offered I believe in the SCG latest minutes to set up this grand all party forum. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for the acceptance from ACL, CCC, Charity, FL etc.
However he also offered on Friday nights CWR to have a forum with fans where Labovitch, Brookfield and Waggot were available to take fans questions. It is my understanding that the Trust offered to facilitate the organisation of that and to make it happen nothing more than that.
Interesting that debate on here over the weekend was that the Tust wasn't militant enough, was too balanced............. and yet Labovitch maintains that the Trust has a history of being extremely hostile to the owners. It would seem asking awkward questions in an attempt to get the facts and clarity is some what more than an inconvenience to the owners & directors.
I think if Labradoodle manages to get a forum with all parties then it a forum with just CCFC would not be needed, would you agree with that OSB?
To balance this he also said about the forum with every single party during the SCG Meeting last month which predates this.
I think if Labradoodle manages to get a forum with all parties then it a forum with just CCFC would not be needed, would you agree with that OSB?
I would doubt a meeting with all parties is going to give any detail on the finances of the club and how we will finance the new stadium, cover losses etc so I'd be quite happy to have both but if there's only going to be one I'd prefer just SISU being quizzed on the accounts of the club. I couldn't really care less what the council or ACL are doing now we no longer have anything to do with them. I'm more interested in what is going to happen moving forward than raking over what has happened in the past.
I can't speak for osb but these are two seperate agendas in my book but both extremely unlikely to happen
It would only be worth having a forum where all questions are answered properly. And I can't see that happening.
Mr Labovitch offered I believe in the SCG latest minutes to set up this grand all party forum. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for the acceptance from ACL, CCC, Charity, FL etc.
The frustrating thing here is that Ann Lucas is on record as stating the strongest possible legal advice was to not comment ahead of the Judicial Review. SISU may, or may not like that advice, but it's out there and as such thus 'offer' seems akin to offering someone who's temporarily blinded a game of darts.
Moreover, in Fisher's own words, SISU have 'moved on', and and now - of course - working towards their new stadium. Within the context of their own recently submitted accounts, what's appropriate about CCC, ACL, Higgs of the ghost of Mother Teresa of Calcutta for that matter, being present to discuss them in isolation?!?
This stance is designed to infer the council are hiding something, they know full well the council will say no thanks.
They don't need an external party to turn up to explain their position to the fans.
Actually no Robbo because what happens at these big forums is that the likes of Linnel (whilst doing a decent job) pick out as many people as they can to make sure lots have their say ut each effectively get a minute to ask one question which gets a vague answer before the host moves on to the next person to ask the same question in a different way to get a similar vague answer.
If you want proper answers the forum on the accounts needs to be much smaller so that issues can be expanded upon and detail drawn out. Not a place that I think Labovitch etc would want to go if challenged by people with the right skills
Labovitch knows damn well that CCC, ACL, Charity are not going to put themselves in to such a forum run by the club (SISU) but chaired by an independent person. It is just more spin and PR. ACL, Charity, FL have no need or desire to do this. The CCC you could argue as a public body should do it but as the whole thing is now going to court on the behest of ARVO, SBS&L , CCFCH (ie SISU) why would they want to? Just more PR spin in my opinion.
But ACL shouldn't say "no thanks". They should turn up. So should everyone else involved in this mess. I think a public forum is a better option that a closed meeting anyway.
Hiding behind the JR doesn't do anyone any good.
I agree they should. And I would buy ticket for ringside.
But they won't accept the invitation.
Sisu are clearly trying to set the agenda and the other parties won't accept that.
Too bad the club refused to meet with members of the Trust. They should have the meeting and have an independent secretary doing the minutes.
In which case the Grand Labovitch Forum is just a distraction or side show that serves no real purpose than to promote SISU's version and potentially open up new avenues for legal action for them to use
But ACL shouldn't say "no thanks". They should turn up. So should everyone else involved in this mess. I think a public forum is a better option that a closed meeting anyway.
Hiding behind the JR doesn't do anyone any good.
This is confusing me now, MMM and I have posted that we'd like to see these forums with a Darts orientated style to it and Godiva would like either a Boxing or Wrestling style to it, we can't do both
Well, the club is complaining about loss of revenue. I think a boxing match Asian style would make a lot more than a dart match. Could even be TV money in it.
Fair point, we wouldn't be able to afford Michael Buffer though Godiva so you'll have to show the world how it's done.
If Sisu wanted to get more of us round to their point of view, surely letting experts like OSB58 question their plans would make sense.
Just watch out Torch & Grendel don't tag team you ;-)
I do find it distasteful that labovitch is seemingly allowed to make slanderous comments, and both him and fisher make extremely hostile comments towards acl and the council, but the second anyone questions them they don't like it.
It's as if they are trying to fool us oh to believing that they are angels in all this.
Labovitch is a twat of a man. Him and fisher really do treat us like they walked us in on the bottom of their shoe
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?