What I think people have said (taken out of context in this particular slant on the argument) is that Thorn's performance should be taken in the context of SISU. That it is largely unfair to compare his win ratio to previous managers. That people need to take things in context. With contrary arguments, people argue their side fairly vociferously at times, but it doesn't mean the counter argument to 'Thorn Out' is that 'Thorn is the best manager we've ever had / has never made an error / is untouchable'.
Argument I was trying to have yesterday. If the squad is shit he is a poor scout, if it is good he is a poor manager! Can't have both
I personally think under achieving and that with the players we have now we shouldn't be where we are.
Can I make what I would have considered a blindingly obvious point..?
The fans who do not want Thorn to be sacked at this point do not think he is 100% divorced from blame for our current predicament. If there is a single fan on here who believes that Andy Thorn as manager has not been responsible for any errors or dropped points, speak now or forever hold your piece...
It is not that he can do no wrong and it is not that SISU absolve every other party of blame as such. When someone is suggesting Thorn Out and you do not agree, you talk about the positives, the constraints and the shades of grey. For this reason, it may appear to the likes of SickBoy that Thorn can do no wrong with some and is untouchable. This is categorically not the case. We take his actions within the context of SISU. That is all. In much the same way, the Thorn Out lot get accused of finding ammunition in every last detail to add credence to their desire to replace the manager (press conference, loanees who have not made their debut, etc, etc.) . This is for the exact same reason... you are arguing your point and backing it up with reasons. I would imagine also that the vast majority of them do not hold Thorn 100% responsible (i.e. with SISU and the players devoid of blame).
This debate is really taking the edge off this forum for me, which shouldn't be any of your concern. I just wish that both sides could take comments at face value and try to consider both sides.
Now that I have got that off my chest, here is the truth...
We should have picked up more points away.
Thorn makes some tactical failings and questionable substitutions (or lack thereof).
SISU dictate the playing staff through their financial constraints (I categorically believe that Thorn has recently been effectively told to expect a fire sale and I expect SISU to remain in post until the close season at the very least as a result).
EVERYONE is dissatisfied at not getting out of the relegation zone.
The team needs our support.
Whether you want Thorn Out or not, I would actually question how much difference it really makes right now. He is in post. SISU have not completed the 'listen to a fucking word your fans say' mandatory training. We are in the biggest relegation fight in recent memory, with the most limited squad. If he keeps us up, I will applaud him. If he takes us down, I won't blame him exclusively. My opinion... I won't force it on you or give two shits if you disagree. But I am going to vocally support the team and manager from now until the end of the season and think it is a bit of a shame if anyone withholds that just because they are disillusioned with Andy Thorn.
I think the vociferously is probably deep frustration with the club overall and it is beginning to surface. The fans have been very calm this season all things considered and have been excellent in their support for the team. As relegation becomes a reality those who believe someone could do better than Thorn are bound to get more & more vocal.
So SISU are the scapegoat for our dreadful away form?
Are you sure Coleman & Reid are worse managers than Thorn?
The majority of City fans I'd say are actually somewhere in the middle-it's the polar opposites that do my, and yours, and everyone else's heads in here. OTT criticism is met by OTT defences-and it only takes one 'Thorn's the worst manager we've ever had' or 'Thorn is a fantastic manager and nobody could do better' to start it all off. Once someone does, the thread's essentially a write-off.
Of course it does, Forest, a case in point last week. Thorn thought we were doing fine and didn't look in any trouble in the first half. All well and good and most certainly true, but we could all see as fans that Forest were there for the taking and we should have gone for the throat from the off.
What we got however was a cautious, keep it tight and retain possession game from the Sky Blues. Now no-one could argue that tactic has served us well in away games can they. No-one could argue that point as the results prove otherwise.
Seems clearly apparent that away from home we are too cautious and try to keep possession and keep it all tight. In view of the fact that pretty much every game away from home this season we have made terrible gaffes at the back that have resulted in goals and defeats, you would have thought we might try and consider having the ball a bit more in the opposition half.
Some games against tough opposition of course you have to keep it tight. Forest was not one of those games though. There were 3 vital points in the offing and they had only scored once in eight homes games. That in turn should have dictated our tactics somewhat and encouraged us to throw a bit more caution to the wind and go on the offensive.
I'm pretty sure that we are all going to look back at that Forest game and say "That was our big chance. Had we won that one then maybe, just maybe we would have stayed up."
Less than 10 goals away from home = loserville as far as im concerned
Argument I was trying to have yesterday. If the squad is shit he is a poor scout, if it is good he is a poor manager! Can't have both
I personally think under achieving and that with the players we have now we shouldn't be where we are.
Dann, Fox they were scouted by Thorn.
Was'nt there comment at the time that dowie was involved ,no proof just conjecture.
Alan Poole, the man on the archives at the CT, doesn't seem to think so.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/co...ng-rallying-around-andy-thorn-92746-30289728/
"Throw in Scott Dann and Danny Fox, both of whom were recruited during his spell as chief scout and rapidly shipped out at a healthy profit, and it’s hardly surprising that the Sky Blues’ fortunes have waned."
This article seems to suggest Thorn was a Ranson recruit too.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/co...ventry-city-says-gary-hoffman-92746-29036508/
...which would make sense as Ranson claimed his 'scouts' had dibs on Fox and Dann before he and SISU came to the club.
Alan Poole, the man on the archives at the CT, doesn't seem to think so.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/co...ng-rallying-around-andy-thorn-92746-30289728/
"Throw in Scott Dann and Danny Fox, both of whom were recruited during his spell as chief scout and rapidly shipped out at a healthy profit, and it’s hardly surprising that the Sky Blues’ fortunes have waned."
This article seems to suggest Thorn was a Ranson recruit too.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/co...ventry-city-says-gary-hoffman-92746-29036508/
...which would make sense as Ranson claimed his 'scouts' had dibs on Fox and Dann before he and SISU came to the club.
Interesting reading
Can we just put this to bed now? He isn't going to be sacked at this stage of the season. Who could we realistically get that will make a difference? Like him or loathe him we are stuck with eachother so please support him and the lads from now to the end of the season.
For those who point out how our form differs from home to away, can I point out that historically teams win twice as many home games as away. That means we would expect to have won 3 games. There is a thing over the short term called variance which can be luck affected. Over the long term that does tend to be more even, but when you consider how recent 4 of those wins have come at home, when you take into account conficence palying at home v away, particularly when away teams know we won't roll over at home and will set up diferently at home v away and when you have a monkey on your back because everyone points out your away record at every opportunity so players becoame nervous if leading in the closing stages (like Blackpool) then its easy to see why there is a difference. Forest last week was shocking, but that is not indicative of recent performances imo. Please stop being so negative some of you.
It is clear that with young players especially how quicly that can transfer onto the pitch. If you want this club to survive in this league, then whatever you feel about the players. the owners or the management, now is the time to unite behind them. We need all of us pulling together because that goal or that point may be the difference between that line which divides success and failure - PUSB!
That's the thing Rob, the way some are acting on here you'd think he'd lost the dressing room and we don't know where our next win will come from.
If you're in a relegation battle and the team are still playing for you then why risk throwing that away?
I agree with most of that but to say the sacking would make no difference ignores very recent history, it made a difference last season with 10 games to go.
But that hasn't answered the question of who would realistically make adifference that would come and what are you basing that on? When AB was sacked we were on an 18 game winless run and he had funds to spend. Thorn is far from perfect but he isn't going to be sacked (at least not until we are mathematically down) whether you think he should or not so we need to support him.
Boothroyd had no funds to spend there was a transfer embargo from January. He had academy players on the bench that month. No he isn't going to be sacked but that doesn't mean many cannot express their frustration at this apathy the club has taken towards his obvious inability to do the job.
Playing for him? Do you just ignore the away record since his joining the club. Is Thorn travel sick and cannot attend these games?!!
Ha ha this is why I feel that sacking managers is stupid sound familiar .............
Feb 11th 2011
Last week Coventry City manager Aidy Boothroyd said he could do with bringing in one or two loan signing to boost his injury depleted squad, but that now looks as if it might not happen.
With the emergency loan window now open, Boothroyd has revealed that at the moment it is unlikely that he will sign any new players.
He explained to the CT: "It is never that simple and it is no use going off and getting players similar to what we have got. We want to get players who are as good or better and the availability has got to be there and that's not always the case."
"So sometimes it is better to battle on with what you have got, so that's what we will do and try to get our best players back fit."
If they've stopped playing for him then perhaps you'd like to explain our home form. Do you just ignore that?
If they've stopped playing for him then perhaps you'd like to explain our home form. Do you just ignore that?
So unless a team wins all matches home and away then the manager has lost the dressing room?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?