Man City are so far ahead of the rest could be because the rest are pretty average ? The Premier is 3 divisions in one as you've got six or seven at the top, then a large group in the middle, and then others fighting it out at the bottom. Personally I enjoyed the Championship, especially when we played midland clubs and the likes of Leeds,both Sheffield clubs, as the atmosphere was good and most games were lively. Not a big fan of the Premier it's become distant from "real football" and even though I watch games on the telly and in the pub, that's because I like football.
Burnley could end up sixth and Albion get relegated. So that means Burnley are a much better team than the Baggies.Disagree, below Arsenal it's a massive pile of dross that just happens to be in the fortunate position of being better run than the clubs further down. I don't look at Burnley in 7th and think they are infinitely better on paper than West Brom at the bottom. Yes Arsenal are wobbling a bit but once Wenger inevitably departs and a competent replacement is found it'll be the top 6 and everyone else.
Burnley could end up sixth and Albion get relegated. So that means Burnley are a much better team than the Baggies.
I hear Dyche is fancied for the Arsenal job. But he won't get it as he's not fashionable enough, so says the "experts" on the radio !Better managed but not much difference on paper.
Except they didn't.No, it's retaining the ball, trying to draw the opposition out, to create space, that allows them to play in and attack.
I hear Dyche is fancied for the Arsenal job. But he won't get it as he's not fashionable enough, so says the "experts" on the radio !
boring to casual footy fansNo, it's retaining the ball, trying to draw the opposition out, to create space, that allows them to play in and attack.
1 result in a season of 50 is enough to make them a bad team lolWhen the opposition reacts their play can be electric, but Chelsea were literally watching them do it almost as if they refused to play along.
To think Man City had what should have been a tricky run of fixtures and it that time only Wigan have brought it to them.
You said you could name 10 so I thought OK, i'll give it a go.
Daniel Sturridge
David Da Silva
Harry Kane
Berkovic ?
Callum Wilson
Deli Ali
Danny Rose (is is still a regular?)
Vincente Kompany (does he still play, Man City)
Walcote
Wayne Rooney
Kieron Dyer
Charlie Adam
Peter Crouch
Darren Bent?
Obviously there will be loads that I have heard of once I watch a match.
However it doesnt leap out at me as a spectacle. The match against Stoke was a reminder of how good and exciting football used to be. I know they are a Premier league team but it was more like a Championship fixture. Thats where the passion still is (I hope, when we get there)
For 3 shots on goal and playing backwards?1 result in a season of 50 is enough to make them a bad team lol
btw i agree chelsea vs city was boring but thats chelseas fault not city. city can only be admired
He would end up like Moyes at United. Didn't knock the quality of his management, but you can't seriously argue that Burnley have a team of galacticos at his disposal.
I'd have thought Eddie Howe would be the better fit for Arsenal tbh.I personally don't like him too much but I've heard a couple of extensive interviews with him and he has some fairly interesting ideas. Would like to se him have a crack at the Arsenal job just out of interest as I wouldn't really give two fucks what the outcome was.
Hardly.boring to casual footy fans
i agree with you though, its beautiful to watch
Where would people rank Man City's team this season compared to the greatest PL teams? Arsenal 2003-2004, Chelsea 2004-2005, Chelsea 2015-16, United 1999-2000 and United 1993-1994. For me the Chelsea team under Mourinho is still the best I've seen as a whole unit
That's the "highlights" in a nutshell. Everyone on the pitch should be embarrased to take a pay chequeHardly.
Silva passes to De Bruyne. De Bruyne gives it back to Silva (repeat)
True. Mainly because they would be tackledI think this Man City side would beat all of them but it wouldn’t be so easy if Liverpool of the 80’s
it would depend on whether the game was held using 80s rules for passing back to the keeper or not.I think this Man City side would beat all of them but it wouldn’t be so easy if Liverpool of the 80’s
it would depend on whether the game was held using 80s rules for passing back to the keeper or not.
Hardly.
Silva passes to De Bruyne. De Bruyne gives it back to Silva (repeat)
Mcdonald starts the hoof
Lots of hoofing it forward by us early on
Aimless so far
It never comes to anything on the deck either, pass it around and then hoof it. Strikers are chasing lost causes.
Lost count of long kicks to one of their defenders, nowhere near any of our players.
So what?as opposed to...
Hardly.
Silva passes to De Bruyne. De Bruyne gives it back to Silva (repeat)
Settle down Jose.You dont know anything about football.
You dont know anything about football.
Hmm. Spurs were by far the better side over two legs, but the Juve nous got them through. Hardly schooled.Two of the great sides losing at home tonight. Spurs schooled by Juve.
They were schooled. Juve let their foot off the gas in the first leg. Cut through Spurs effortlessly in the second half last night. Spurs are supposedly some great side.Hmm. Spurs were by far the better side over two legs, but the Juve nous got them through. Hardly schooled.
As for City, they were already through.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Spurs are far from a great side but they outplayed Juve in the first leg. They had two chances in the second leg and scored two goals. Hardly cutting through them effortlessly.They were schooled. Juve let their foot off the gas in the first leg. Cut through Spurs effortlessly in the second half last night. Spurs are supposedly some great side.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?