skyblue025
Well-Known Member
Is James not still running coaches? Could be a gap in the market here.
Well, let's all just cross our fingers and hope that he IS.Is James not still running coaches? Could be a gap in the market here.
I see this a lot but how do we know their in financial trouble ?
With only a few thousand in I can very much see St Andrews being soulless too. Any empty stadium is.Instead of looking at the negatives ( and there many ) look at the positives of playing at St.Andrews - there are a lot of positives too.
1. A proper football stadium opposed to the soulless Ricoh.
2. A decent pitch to suit our style of football.
3. Much better transport links for those living outside Coventry.
4. A lot more pubs to visit.
5. Our club didn't go out of existence.
6. We have a brilliant manager with ambition.
My plea to all those who are refusing to go to St.Andrews ( and I respect your view even if mine differs ) is to please just try going to St.Andrews, put your differences to one side and give it a go ?
The canal runs quite close by, I've heard he is doing a boat.Is James not still running coaches? Could be a gap in the market here.
I don't think I am alone in having a dislike for the Ricoh, wrong location, a concrete bowl and a crap pitch. Maybe 50 plus years of being a season ticket holder at Highfield Road makes me feel this way. My preference is for a new smaller stadium with stands closer to the pitch.With only a few thousand in I can very much see St Andrews being soulless too. Any empty stadium is.
And imagine only a few thousand there and us losing.
The way some talk on here I think they would be happy never going back to the Ricoh, even if that meant just playing in another city forever and a day.
I don't think I am alone in having a dislike for the Ricoh, wrong location, a concrete bowl and a crap pitch. Maybe 50 plus years of being a season ticket holder at Highfield Road makes me feel this way. My preference is for a new smaller stadium with stands closer to the pitch.
I just don’t buy this “better pitch” thing. A crap pitch didn’t stop us in the 17/18 season did it? Nor did it make our players take 10 extra touches in the box instead of shooting last season...
Actually I think it did. Im sure MR on occasions has said because the ball was bobbling around so much players were trying to get it under control before shooting.I just don’t buy this “better pitch” thing. A crap pitch didn’t stop us in the 17/18 season did it? Nor did it make our players take 10 extra touches in the box instead of shooting last season...
It was Ricoh or nothing for you, I thought?I don't think I am alone in having a dislike for the Ricoh, wrong location, a concrete bowl and a crap pitch. Maybe 50 plus years of being a season ticket holder at Highfield Road makes me feel this way. My preference is for a new smaller stadium with stands closer to the pitch.
Have to agree. After half a season we had created more chances then anyone except Luton, we just couldn't put them away.
Not sure how much you can blame the pitch for that.
As a last resort Ricoh better than not having a club at all. I have only once felt any real atmosphere - the first game back v Gillingham, reminded me of the atmosphere at HR during the JH era.It was Ricoh or nothing for you, I thought?
I can criticise the Ricoh in isolation. Would rather we were at another ground... in Coventry.There's been a few. Preston in the cup was great.
I must say, this all makes me feel a little ill at ease, all this bigging up someone else's ground 20 miles away and totally dissing our home stadium for its terrible pitch, its soulless atmosphere, its concreteness, the surrounding area etc. etc.
Bottom line is we need to get back there and back as soon as possible.
IF there ever was to be a new stadium that could be at least 5 years away and this Birmingham love-in isn't going to last forever and the longer we are away the more fans we will lose.
As it stands, the Ricoh is the ONLY option in Coventry.
I am not comfortable with the notion that Birmingham's ground is wonderful and full of positives and the Ricoh, all negatives only.
It's IN Coventry and playing there should be our priority
With only a few thousand in I can very much see St Andrews being soulless too. Any empty stadium is.
And imagine only a few thousand there and us losing.
The way some talk on here I think they would be happy never going back to the Ricoh, even if that meant just playing in another city forever and a day.
And I don't have a problem with that,but it is the positives of the situation whilst totally slagging off every aspect of the Ricoh I don't care for.I don't think it's a case of everyone saying they're glad to be out of the Ricoh, it's more people looking at the positives of a shit situation.
Still though, speaking objectively the Ricoh is terrible whereas St Andrews has a lot of good things about it. Still rather be in the soulless concrete bowl we call home but am able to see the flaws in it.And I don't have a problem with that,but it is the positives of the situation whilst totally slagging off every aspect of the Ricoh I don't care for.
There are a lot of people out there heartbroken we have left our city again and obviously the vast majority of City fans will not be attending St. Andrews.
I would guess the last thing they want to hear is how wonderful St. Andrews is and how crap the Ricoh was.
With that sort of stance you could be forgiven in thinking that some would be quite happy to stay in Birmingham permanently if the only other option is always only the Ricoh.
Regretfully, if long term, the Ricoh even though I do not like it. I could stomach St Andrew's for a year or two.Okay, so can just I ask a general question to everyone on here.
If and obviously this is just supposing, IF the only two options were playing at St. Andrews for the next 10-15 years, OR coming back to the Ricoh, what would you choose?
Just wondering if people WOULD actually choose St. Andrews over the Ricoh. Some seem to prefer it right now, but would you accept the situation and prefer it on a long term basis?
Yeah,I know it has flaws. HR had loads of flaws too, one being some of the views were really awful. I endured three seasons of having a pillar blocking out half the goal in the West End.Still though, speaking objectively the Ricoh is terrible whereas St Andrews has a lot of good things about it. Still rather be in the soulless concrete bowl we call home but am able to see the flaws in it.
Okay, so can just I ask a general question to everyone on here.
If and obviously this is just supposing, IF the only two options were playing at St. Andrews for the next 10-15 years, OR coming back to the Ricoh, what would you choose?
Just wondering if people WOULD actually choose St. Andrews over the Ricoh. Some seem to prefer it right now, but would you accept the situation and prefer it on a long term basis?
Ricoh. Although I would feel more comfortable in Birmingham for a few years if I could see progress on a new stadium. 10/15 is too long.Okay, so can just I ask a general question to everyone on here.
If and obviously this is just supposing, IF the only two options were playing at St. Andrews for the next 10-15 years, OR coming back to the Ricoh, what would you choose?
Just wondering if people WOULD actually choose St. Andrews over the Ricoh. Some seem to prefer it right now, but would you accept the situation and prefer it on a long term basis?
Only hope is new owners for a new stadium I feel.Ricoh. Although I would feel more comfortable in Birmingham for a few years if I could see progress on a new stadium. 10/15 is too long.
Your football day (from what I understand) is walking to the ground, watching the game then walking home. For a lot of others it involves the pre and post match experience. People could have moan about the view or atmosphere at HR with friends in a decent pub on the way to or from the ground and inject some life in to the city centre.Yeah,I know it has flaws. HR had loads of flaws too, one being some of the views were really awful. I endured three seasons of having a pillar blocking out half the goal in the West End.
And fans were always moaning about the atmosphere too. Constantly.
I dislike the Ricoh immensely for many reasons, and if there was another option in Coventry I'd be all over it, but I think the atmosphere thing is a bit of a myth. It can be flat of course, but there have been many occasions when it has been excellent.
So often over the past 8 or 9 years I've gone to away games and been amazed at how lifeless the home support has been and how completely devoid of atmosphere grounds can be when hosting lower league football. There are very few exceptions to be honest.
Well you would have thought so wouldn't you.What a ridiculous question! 10-15 years at St Andrews or a return to the Ricoh :banghead:
Yep, get all that and very valid.Your football day (from what I understand) is walking to the ground, watching the game then walking home. For a lot of others it involves the pre and post match experience. People could have moan about the view or atmosphere at HR with friends in a decent pub on the way to or from the ground and inject some life in to the city centre.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?