Still don't know why none of the fans groups have taken this up as a request TBH. Seems to suit all sides from a fan perspective, and really that's all we should care about.
They don't want to see it because they're so blinded with hate towards ccc.
In a way i wish the higgs and council would of told the club to piss off all those years ago when we really were up shit creak. Then these people really would of had something to cry about.
They don't want to see it because they're so blinded with hate towards ccc.
In a way i wish the higgs and council would of told the club to piss off all those years ago when we really were up shit creak. Then these people really would of had something to cry about.
big ccfc fan this guy.
Yes i am, ever since the Wallace and fergie days.
Im no fan of ccc but what would the club of done all those years ago if ccc would of told them to fuck off?
Maybe divs like you should be a bit more grateful.
...minutes here: http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/...s-31-march-coventry-city-110414-1482530.aspx?
However we're not allowed to duplicate any of these minutes on here, so please be ultra cautious if you decide to make any comments on this thread.
'These minutes are not a verbatim record'
'There then followed a general discussion around Sixfields and the new stadium'
Useless. Utterly useless.
council employeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Not to mention the 4-6 months coming out as 46 months blunder and the different font sizes.
Have they got a 6 year old minuting/proofreading this?
June 26th 2013.
Tim Fisher "On the site for a new stadium, which Mr Fisher hopes would be built within three years, he said: “We’re down to two or three sites in the immediate Coventry area, and we’re going into the final furlong of site negotiations."
so, in short, we are no further on !
June 26th 2013.
Tim Fisher "On the site for a new stadium, which Mr Fisher hopes would be built within three years, he said: “We’re down to two or three sites in the immediate Coventry area, and we’re going into the final furlong of site negotiations."
so, in short, we are no further on from that then, oh well, its only been nearly 10 months now.
Even allowing for the assumed typos (46 months s/be 4-6 months) adding up the various times given for possible stages of the planning process looks like up to 3 years to me. Yet the minutes then suggest a worst case of 2 years!
Actually, if time estimates are as good as Tim's & Mark's 3 weeks, maybe 4-6 months will turn out to be 46 months.
For the love of god, sisu don't need to own the Ricoh. They need access to revenues and a peppercorn rent.
Or idealy they sod off.
£1.3 million a year buys a lot of peppercorns.
so if CT and Trust have done all those FOI enquiries of all the authorities that neighbour Coventry (including Warwick, Rugby and Warwickshire who all said no) just how far south is this second site?
Pays a lot of interest and managementfees to
so if CT and Trust have done all those FOI enquiries of all the authorities that neighbour Coventry (including Warwick, Rugby and Warwickshire who all said no) just how far south is this second site?
any news on the curtains or seat colours ?
Fair play Sandra has noted that the minutes have been posted and wanted me to clarify that the 46 months is a mistake and should indeed be 4-6 months. She will send an updated version later and I have said I will post them. Still feel we are all being deceived by our owners
They are watching us then ? :welcome:
agreeIn 5-6 years the club will have no fans left and guess what Fisher...
You won't even need to build a new stadium.
Fantastic planning. Well done.
agree
Sandra has given me the proper version. Will upload in a second
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?