I think you're getting ahead of yourself there. They've got to find a judge first to overturn the decision that they don't have the right to appeal before they can appeal.
But as a JR deals with the situation at a single point in time isn't there pretty much unlimited scope for them to mount new JRs as and when the current one gets struck down?
But as a JR deals with the situation at a single point in time isn't there pretty much unlimited scope for them to mount new JRs as and when the current one gets struck down?
You might think though that if a case has no real merit it would be weeded out at the pre trial stage. But yes you could keep looking for new reasons to bring actions covering different events and times
that's what the bare bones of it were I believe, as reported in the local media. The agreement shortened the loan period from 40 to 20 years but retained the same amount in interest in total.