I must admit; I do wonder what SISU think they'll get if they are successful.
Gates would be pitiful, and their reputation within the 'football family' would be like that afforded Wimbledon's owners when they moved to Milton Keynes.
No income, universally hated and with ever increasing losses; what the hell is the end game?
Is that even possible?
It's an auction ... I don't think you can 'condition' a bid.
Maybe it will at least mean someone can bid for everything from SISU...& then buy half/all(?) the stadium?
so lets say SISU win the bid with an offer of £2.
then what ?. A team playing outside Cov, with no income, paying more rent than they did last year, no fans and as it stands, no sponsorship.
If Sisu win it, ACL won't negotiated them them.When a buyer is found ACL will be open to negotiations. If sisu wins those negotiations will cost ACL dearly. Either ACL becomes a company under SBS&L or they lose all business from the club. Very expensive however you look at it. And it will most likely require new faces at the ACL side of the table.
That is how I see it.
According to Fisher, they're moving. So, it might mean some, or total ownership of the Fisher Arena; but when? And where? And who covers ever-increasing losses in the interim?
Surely no one would make an offer for the Club if they are not certain where the Golden Share would be. (Except SISU who know where it is.)
You could be buying the debt but not the golden share.
Neither would I given the way SISU have behaved.If Sisu win it, ACL won't negotiated them them.
According to Fisher, they're moving. So, it might mean some, or total ownership of the Fisher Arena; but when? And where? And who covers ever-increasing losses in the interim?
Surely no one would make an offer for the Club if they are not certain where the Golden Share would be. (Except SISU who know where it is.)
You could be buying the debt but not the golden share.
Reading between the lines I'd say the Administrator is clearly saying that the club and holdings are one and the same.
The key word is "purporting". This cannot be underestimated imo.
He obviosly takes a dim view of Fisher trying to suggest they are different entities.
but if SISU take back CCFC Ltd they will own both companies and FL wont give the share to anyone else (PHiV included)
but if SISU take back CCFC Ltd they will own both companies and FL wont give the share to anyone else (PHiV included)
My god an easy one to answer, that's a noveltyYES.
i read this new statement, and thought.. ahhhhhh i get it now!!
then i took five minutes to understand it .. and i thought , nope i still dont
then i read it again & thought.. yeaaaaahhhh i get whats going on now!!!
then i read it again & thought.. nope , still dont !
but if SISU take back CCFC Ltd they will own both companies and FL wont give the share to anyone else (PHiV included)
So stop sale of ltd lets get a definative answer then if it is in Limited let the bidding begin. I would have thought that pressurer should be brought to delay the sale just a thought it would then take the pressure off the administrator
and then would ACL have to cave and give SISU what they want to play at the Ricoh?...:thinking about:
What are "the three main purposes of administration" Appleton refers to ?
but if SISU take back CCFC Ltd they will own both companies and FL wont give the share to anyone else (PHiV included)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?