Frequently on here I see the assertion that the City have the second lowest budget in the Championship, with only Wycombe below us. Where are the stats to back this up? If somebody could point me in the right direction, or if somebody has them, I would be grateful.
I'm interested in looking at £'s spent per place in the league table - if it hasn't already been done
And for all those out there saying that that is not a good way of looking at it, humour me.
Think it’s reference to wage Bill that will be on the accounts as staffing costs at some pointYou can’t really do it. A lot of transfer fees are not disclosed as well as being appearance based. Wages are pointless as a lot are inherited wages with players who are just simply not worth what they are paid
The only real indicator I would say of activity is agent fees. There’s a table on that somewhere and normally the bigger spending clubs are at the top of that
Think it’s reference to wage Bill that will be on the accounts as staffing costs at some point
It’s what robins means by budget though I reckonthat isn’t an indication of spend
It’s what robins means by budget though I reckon
Wage budget has a very high correlation with success/performance. More so than transfer expenditure.
Of the 9 teams below us (9! How good is that), 7 would have a higher wage bill than us so we're definitely performing above expectations from a financial standpoint.
Which proves it doesn’t have a correlation as Derby Forest and Birmingham have much higher wage bills than most teams outside the premier relegated teams in this league - much higher than Barnsley, Preston, Luton, Millwall, Brentford etc
Which proves it doesn’t have a correlation as Derby Forest and Birmingham have much higher wage bills than most teams outside the premier relegated teams in this league - much higher than Barnsley, Preston, Luton, Millwall, Brentford etc
There is a strong correlation - otherwise you would not have the so called big 6Which proves it doesn’t have a correlation as Derby Forest and Birmingham have much higher wage bills than most teams outside the premier relegated teams in this league - much higher than Barnsley, Preston, Luton, Millwall, Brentford etc
There is a strong correlation - otherwise you would not have the so called big 6
Good or poor management can influence this , but correlation is based on statistics, and statistically there is a very very strong correlation in spite of some outliers
I think this is what I was looking for. I was expecting to be able to do a graph with spend along the bottom and points up the side, and the line looking like the top left quartile of the clock. So extra money at the bottom reeps high rewards but you get much fewer bangs for your buck the more you spend at the very topThere's been numerous studies over the years that concluded wage bills are the best correlation to league positions.
Obviously it'll never be exact but can be a good way to highlight those overperforming (Us, Barnsley etc.) or underperforming (Derby, Forest etc.)
Anyway;
We'll be much much higher on the first graph now as it was done at beginning of March.
I think this is what I was looking for. I was expecting to be able to do a graph with spend along the bottom and points up the side, and the line looking like the top left quartile of the clock. So extra money at the bottom reeps high rewards but you get much fewer bangs for your buck the more you spend at the very top
I was also seeing it as a measure of managerial ability. Ainsworth actually has done a great job at Wycombe - they have not been mullered every week and gone back with their tails between their legs.
Thanks FRostie / Liam
Yeah. Worth noting as he says that the figures are by no means an exact science & you won't get an exact detail obviously. Valuations from Transfermarkt are wildly off (far too low usually) but are at least consistent across the board so the rankings will still work out about right.
There's been numerous studies over the years that concluded wage bills are the best correlation to league positions.
Yeah but what about Barnsley tho
I’ve been on this forum for years but have only just realised that Grendel is either just the biggest wind up merchant the world has ever seen or he’s wrong about everything. It’s almost every thread he’s making comments that are just wrong!
The wages quoted are ridiculous - our wage bill was nearly £4 million in league two
Across the whole club yes, not just the players.
It clearly states they are estimates.
Or Millwall or Luton or Brentford - that chart proves other than the relegated premier league clubs this is a more open division than probably the other 3
Why does the chart prove anything if you claimed the numbers were ridiculous two minutes after you posted this?
You're a bit all over the place here.
They are not estimates. They are made up The club had a 30% uplift clause in promotion from L2 to L1 and will have even greater rises in L1 to Championship
Come on
Didn’t Sunderland get relegated from the premier league and then relegated from the championship the following season?Hardly - I assume you are still googling who Bobby Gould is.
There is no possibility of top spending premier league clubs getting relegated from that league
Let’s do this with crayons. Is that factually accurate in you view?
Didn’t Sunderland get relegated from the premier league and then relegated from the championship the following season?
Brentford? In the last 5 years they've spent £57mOr Millwall or Luton or Brentford - that chart proves other than the relegated premier league clubs this is a more open division than probably the other 3
Brentford? In the last 5 years they've spent £57m
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?