Stokes and Tudgay (1 Viewer)

PVA · Jul 28, 2015

kg82 · Jul 28, 2015

What? I don't get it?

Seamus1 · Jul 28, 2015

Carrying a few extra pounds around the belly area?

oakey · Jul 28, 2015

The real issue is what the hell is going on with the size of shorts this year?
Are we playing US college basketball? They are at least 2 sizes too big and look ridiculous.

Terry Gibson's perm · Jul 28, 2015

tudgay looks fine, a Stokes looks like he is carrying a lot of timber

letsallsingtogether · Jul 28, 2015

Seamus1 said:
Carrying a few extra pounds around the belly area?

Anorexic compared to some of us

kg82 · Jul 28, 2015

oakey said:
The real issue is what the hell is going on with the size of shorts this year?
Are we playing US college basketball? They are at least 2 sizes too big and look ridiculous.

Oh yeah, that's the real issue here!!

Also, are they?! They hardly look like Jupiter and Saturn to me.

Hobo · Jul 28, 2015

Seamus1 said:
Carrying a few extra pounds around the belly area?

I remember Stoke City playing at Highfield Road once, now that was a real pub side!

oakey · Jul 28, 2015

Those are are proper shorts.
We could do with those players too.
:claping hands:

kg82 · Jul 28, 2015

oakey said:
View attachment 4485

Those are are proper shorts.
We could do with those players too.
:claping hands:

I can't see the bloody shorts in that pict... wait a minute :thinking about:

oakey · Jul 28, 2015

Shorts, they are called shorts, not longs or plus twos.
:facepalm:

Kingokings204 · Jul 28, 2015

Players come back a bit of fat on. That's life. Is that really the issue?

wingy · Jul 28, 2015

Verticals stripes very unforgiving to the portly.

Danceswithhorses · Jul 28, 2015

oakey said:
View attachment 4485

Those are are proper shorts.
We could do with those players too.
:claping hands:

Great pic-quality players and quality kit, except maybe those hotpants...i mean shorts

ajsccfc · Jul 28, 2015

oakey said:
Shorts, they are called shorts, not longs or plus twos.
:facepalm:

Longs would be trousers.

oakey · Jul 28, 2015

If they get any longer they will be knickerbockers. A return to Singers F.C.

dongonzalos · Jul 28, 2015

I thought this might be that they are not good enough for a team serious on getting in the top six. Maybe a pist to say their wages combined may have got us Murphy or McLeod?

pusbccfc · Jul 29, 2015

Flecky is a bit chubby ent he?

Nick · Jul 29, 2015

dongonzalos said:
I thought this might be that they are not good enough for a team serious on getting in the top six. Maybe a pist to say their wages combined may have got us Murphy or McLeod?

Are you determined to get the same thing into every thread? Bit negative isn't it?

dongonzalos · Jul 29, 2015

Nick said:
Are you determined to get the same thing into every thread? Bit negative isn't it?

They are two of my, could we free up their wages, in our squad. I have thought a few times before if their wages were combined could we afford a genuine proven 20 goal man. Then get a loanee left back and 3 loanee attackers.
Then I saw the thread title

Sick Boy · Jul 29, 2015

dongonzalos said:
I thought this might be that they are not good enough for a team serious on getting in the top six. Maybe a pist to say their wages combined may have got us Murphy or McLeod?

I will leave the football knowledge to others if I was you, time and time again you make a fool of yourself.

Clive Bleakin · Jul 29, 2015

Let's see how much Tudgay gets away with this season.

He did less than Nouble last season and he got dog's abide off some fans

Stokes and Tudgay (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

New Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency