You gave your opinion on sacking him. I didn't think that was your job either?
So what is your opinion on who should replace him if he is sacked?
So was appointing TM a fluke,good or bad appointment?As I have repeatedly said that is a pointless argument. Manager recruitment is often complete fluke
You only have to look at who was considered the worst appointment in the premier league and the bookies hot favourite to be sacked to first to realise that.
As I have repeatedly said that is a pointless argument. Manager recruitment is often complete fluke
You only have to look at who was considered the worst appointment in the premier league and the bookies hot favourite to be sacked to first to realise that.
I didn't realise it was an argument I thought it was a question. I take it you have absolutely no idea who you would like to come in if you get your wish and Mowbray gets sacked.
It's time for Anderson to get the Lugar out of the draw ready and waiting
Id give him 2 games to show he can turn it round.
So when fans called for the head of Dowie, Adams, Thorn, Pressley, Coleman, boothroyd - they all had to nominate a successor before expressing that view?
Lots of people do yes. Not everyone that short sighted to just want a sacking without considering the next appointment.
Loads of people have a look at what's available or what might be possible if the manager is sacked.
So when fans called for the head of Dowie, Adams, Thorn, Pressley, Coleman, boothroyd - they all had to nominate a successor before expressing that view?
I've been there, we all have. Sacking Mowbray would be an unwise decision. Were still in the playoffs.
I don't know any fan that thinks like that.
So no Man Utd was saying sack LVG now whilst JM is available.
Or were they not talking about Pep prior to the man city announcement.
Fans wanted LVG gone anyway - what are you bumbling on about?
It's quite obvious really.
They want him gone and they are also capable of thinking about who they would like to replace him
Giggs
JM
Pep ect....
Most people are capable of doing the same thing
No they just wanted him gone - and when you are one if the biggest clubs in the world by definition the likely managerial options are going to be the biggest managers in the world.
I've never once on here seen that argument applied to any managers when a fan wants his head.
That's a very valid point.So when fans called for the head of Dowie, Adams, Thorn, Pressley, Coleman, boothroyd - they all had to nominate a successor before expressing that view?
I think Micky Adams was appointed on the wish of fans
Fans consider who they want to replace a manager they would like sacked.
To suggest you don't think about it because it's not your job to choose the next manager is ridiculous.
Why do you bother expressing your opinion on who should get picked in the starting 11 or not. That also is not your job.
So when fans on this forum were screaming for pressley's head show me the same posters who I also said "I think we should have so and so" - points seem totally lost and you and you are incapable of lucid thought on this topic.
I already said to you managers are a good for at some clubs and not good at others - robins proved a good fit here. The best example is Russell Slade at Orient - when appointed derided but was a great success.
Mowbray is not proving a good fit at seems to have an alarming lack of flexibility to try and resolve what is becoming a crises. He may turn it round but how much time is it we give him?
Fans consider who they want to replace a manager they would like sacked.
If I again prove you wrong and show fans on this forum discussing who could replace SP before he was sacked.
Will you for the first time in your life admit and say the words ....
"I was wrong" ?
.......
Mowbray is not proving a good fit at seems to have an alarming lack of flexibility to try and resolve what is becoming a crises. He may turn it round but how much time is it we give him?
3 weeks?2 more games apparently.
3 weeks?
You really think so? Well I've predicted a defeat, so let's see, eh!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?