Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Thats where I’m at now
Shouldn’t have fallen for the feint to his right should have just made damn sure nothing went in his side
Was a fabulous strike thoigh
Thats where I’m at nowCollins has to do better with the goal, gonna be very hard for the Swansea player to get it up and down from that close so Collins has to make sure his side is covered
I was there, the amount of times he wins the ball back and gets tackles in, he’s had a great game. Doesn’t hide away, always showing for the ball and keeps us ticking over.
The ball over the top of their left back for Saka in the second half was absolutely top class.
Yep caught one tonight from a corner
Appears soTalking about shots. He always fumbles them. Is he doing it on purpose?
How is Godden n/a?Hellishly frustrating. My opinion we did ok in the first half considering the changes and that Allen and Godden were passengers, largely dominated the 2nd and changes made a difference.
Collins, 5. Difficult to tell from my vantage point but seems he either got the wall wrong or his own position, either way poor.
JDS, 4. Targeted and found it difficult
Binks, 6. Grew into it after an (understandable) slow start
Thomas, 7. Solid, and needed to be at times
Lati, 6. Versatile and did ok for me
Allen, 3. Mighty surprised he came out for the 2nd half.
Sheaf, 8. Composed and covered a lot of ground. Probably my MoM
Palmer, 7.5. Really bright, physical and effective.
Wright, 7.5. Personally that was the best I’ve seen him play.
Saka, 8. Inventive, hard working and tenacious. Seems to have found a really good level of consistency/performance
Godden, n/a.
All the subs added something, 6.5 or 7’s across the piece. Pleased for Simms, hoping a goal is a confidence booster for him.
Robbins, 7. Has the team working hard, playing some good stuff at times, and physically resilient and pretty dominant. We need something more in the middle of the park and a striker.
I was there and agree with you BF. And I think that Sheaf is sometimes over rated on here. Tonight he was immense and not helped by Allen for the first 60 minutes either. Going to be even better paired with a true number 8.I was there, the amount of times he wins the ball back and gets tackles in, he’s had a great game. Doesn’t hide away, always showing for the ball and keeps us ticking over.
The ball over the top of their left back for Saka in the second half was absolutely top class.
Palmer 6 were you watching the same game , I thought he was the best player on the pitch , and I was shocked Robins took him off should of given him a bit longerCollins 6
Lati 6
Thomas 6
Binks 6
DaSilva 4
Sheaf 6
Allen 6
Palmer 6
Saka 7
Wright 8 MOTM
Godden 6
Subs
Simms 5
COH 6
MVE 6
I’m perhaps being a bit harsh with a 6 but calling him man of the match is absurdPalmer 6 were you watching the same game , I thought he was the best player on the pitch , and I was shocked Robins took him off should of given him a bit longer
This with 1.5 added to Sheaf and -1 on Wright is pretty much identical to how I saw itCollins 5 am I being harsh saying he should line the wall up better
Lati 5 don't like him at RB, didn't link with saka
Thomas 7 really commanding and I was expecting him to suffer without Kitching
Binks 6 don't think he did too much wrong, a few giveaways
DaSilva 4 exposed repeatedly and looked rusty
Sheaf 6 difficult to rate, some good some shit bits
Allen 5 shit and
Palmer 7 I thought he was really good, different option
Saka 7 was missing Milan but another brilliant assist (sort of)
Wright 8 MOTM big threat all night and excellent goal
Godden 4 awful player nowadays, well off the pace, can't play as a lone striker
Subs
Simms 5
COH 6
MVE 6
For me, he didn’t do anything in the game to justify his place ~ simply couldn’t bring myself to rate him on that level of effort or performance.How is Godden n/a?
Palmer was probably our best player until he came offI’m perhaps being a bit harsh with a 6 but calling him man of the match is absurd
Disagree.Palmer was probably our best player until he came off
I think without Kitching we'd be better with 5 at the back. A few poor performances in there but did enough to win so pretty disappointing overall.
I thought Collins, Godden, Da Silva and Allen below par, Palmer, Sakamoto, Wright and Sheaf above par, possibly MVE too even for just 30 mins. Others and subs, average.
I don't understand most of the Dasilva comments on here. I thought he was fine indeed better than Bidwell in recent matches. The only ones who underperformed were Allen, Collins and Godden.Andy Turner up to his old tricks
JAY DASILVA: 7
Slotted in at left-back in a straight swap for Jake Bidwell as Robins rotated his squad. Got forward well and defended well as he rarely put a foot wrong.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I don't understand most of the Dasilva comments on here. I thought he was fine indeed better than Bidwell in recent matches. The only ones who underperformed were Allen, Collins and Godden.
He was knackered by the time he came off. He had a very good first half but faded quickly as he always doesPalmer 6 were you watching the same game , I thought he was the best player on the pitch , and I was shocked Robins took him off should of given him a bit longer
Simms performance in the 30 mins he was on was far worse than Godden’s.Tonight again gave proof if needed that the time is long overdue to leave Godden out of the starting line up.
He adds nothing to the team that Simms can't provide and more.
How the hell have you given Godden who did fa the same as Palmer who was the best played on the pitch?Collins 6
Lati 6
Thomas 6
Binks 6
DaSilva 4
Sheaf 6
Allen 6
Palmer 6
Saka 7
Wright 8 MOTM
Godden 6
Subs
Simms 5
COH 6
MVE 6
Cos he contributed naff allHow is Godden n/a?
Disagree didn’t look knackered to me and had just created another chance when hookedHe was knackered by the time he came off. He had a very good first half but faded quickly as he always does
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?