Get you gone ya tosspot little twatNever made a sub to run at their tired legs (and help our tired legs) at 3-0 and then sat back inviting pressure after their 1st. Clueless and tactically inept at this level. Get him gone.
He has to take some blame as I'd have made the change immediately after the 1st .. but there's some houdini motherfuckers on here that's for sureReally don't see how it's Robins fault. Players thought it was won, sat off and they scored 3 pretty good goals
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
But what change? I would've maybe gone Dabo for Burroughs but apart from that I don't think anything reallyHe has to take some blame as I'd have made the change immediately after the 1st .. but there's some houdini motherfuckers on here that's for sure
Robin’s totally at fault. Teams tiring sends the subs out to warm up at 61 minutes doesn’t put one on for 15 minutes.Really don't see how it's Robins fault. Players thought it was won, sat off and they scored 3 pretty good goals
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Robins needed to keep the pressure on Swansea by closing them down. First sub should have been Oalmet for O’Hare should also have brought Dabo on for Burroughs who had a great game but by 69 was tiring. At some stage he could have then used Tavares. We controlled the game while we pressed ad some ad the instruction came from the bench for the wing backs to drop back and stop pressing HE lost it.Amazing home defensive record, cruising, Robins entrusted his players to easily see it through and rightly so.
It’s on the players for not being smart enough.
Lesson learnt by all.
I’d love to see the same MR bashers comments if he had of made subs and we’d have still drawn!
Palmer for O hareRobins needed to keep the pressure on Swansea by closing them down. First sub should have been Oalmet for O’Hare should also have brought Dabo on for Burroughs who had a great game but by 69 was tiring. At some stage he could have then used Tavares. We controlled the game while we pressed ad some ad the instruction came from the bench for the wing backs to drop back and stop pressing HE lost it.
Robins needed to keep the pressure on Swansea by closing them down. First sub should have been Oalmet for O’Hare should also have brought Dabo on for Burroughs who had a great game but by 69 was tiring. At some stage he could have then used Tavares. We controlled the game while we pressed ad some ad the instruction came from the bench for the wing backs to drop back and stop pressing HE lost
It was slightly his fault. Brought on kelly for o’hare to try and stop them equalizing and then failed to react when they drew level leaving us with gyokeres totally isolated for the last 10 mins or so chasing a goalReally don't see how it's Robins fault. Players thought it was won, sat off and they scored 3 pretty good goals
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
But what change? I would've maybe gone Dabo for Burroughs but apart from that I don't think anything really
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Incredible how much tactical insight you have after the game has finished! Behave yourself man, Robins will be easily as shocked as the rest of us by that collapse.
Waghorn or Palmer for Allen.
That’s on SISU. Without Fadz our inexperience at the back cost us today. No squad depth.
Never made a sub to run at their tired legs (and help our tired legs) at 3-0 and then sat back inviting pressure after their 1st. Clueless and tactically inept at this level. Get him gone.
Yes, but unlike us he has it within his power to try and do something to change it.Incredible how much tactical insight you have after the game has finished! Behave yourself man, Robins will be easily as shocked as the rest of us by that collapse.
He’s not good enoughNot sure what Tavares has done wrong. Robins in game decision and changes does raise eyebrows and should not be immune to criticism when deserved
But not have the power of knowing a team 3-0 up will stop doing what they were doing and resting on their laurels.Robins is also in the privileged position to be able to change it.
With no guarantees.Yes, but unlike us he has it within his power to try and do something to change it.
He could have made a change after the first goal.
He could have made a more attacking sub than a DM coming back from injury for a AM when the problem was clearly that we were sitting too deep inviting pressure.
He could have used all the subs available to him rather than two to disrupt the momentum and/or give us fresh legs and regain some attacking impetus.
But he didn't. He watched and let us become negative and defensive and let them back into the game.
But having the power to be able to see exactly that happening in front of him.But not have the power of knowing a team 3-0 up will stop doing what they were doing and resting on their laurels.
Then why even bother picking a team and squad before the match? There's no guarantees.With no guarantees.
He’s not good enough
Thats called in game management. We could all see it coming before their first goal. It wasn't against the run of play, it was coming. He had 8 minutes to change it before their second goal and didn't. He waited until we were 3-2 and really clinging on before changing it.But not have the power of knowing a team 3-0 up will stop doing what they were doing and resting on their laurels.
Because the manager who has overseen a hugely successful last 6 years doesn’t play him mainlyhow do you work that out? Without game time we just don’t know. hes a very useful player to have come off the bench with his pace and enthusiasm. Sunderland away this season a prime example
Because the manager who has overseen a hugely successful last 6 years doesn’t play him mainly
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?