Doesn't their stadium only hold about that?Bournemouth get 10k for prem games
We deserve to be above them again lol
Agree. We wouldn't sell anywhere near what Bradford City have sold in season tickets if we matched their policy. Every City has shift workers. Every team occasionally plays on Tuesday AND Saturday at home which means supporters fork out a lot of money. Every city has unemployment. We can't keep using this as an excuse. What we do have is a larger than average population which doesn't want to support their local team.Excuses, excuses. Poor gates IMO. Look at Sunderland, relegated twice, ownership issues, look at Portsmouth at capacity or near as home game, steadfast support. Barnsley just a few thousand bigger population than Nuneaton yet bigger gates than us despite relegation.
If we were in the Championship the excuse would be "we are not in the Premier League"
Those that go have my utmost respect, those that say they support Coventry City but avoid the Ricoh like they would catch ebola have my contempt.
This team deserve better and the manager deserves better.
that is 1-0-1 but S&D not elasticity
if you went to 1-0-2 you would have found out what elasticity meant
But there is a very strong argument to say that season ticket sales are significantly price inelastic. There isn't really a substitute good if you support CCFC, football fans are famously territorial and you could raise season ticket prices by a substantial amount and the drop off wouldn't necessarily be relativeLol, no. You're getting supply and demand and price elasticity mixed up.
price elasticity of demand
noun
1) Price elasticity of demand is a measure used in economics to show the responsiveness, or elasticity, of the quantity demanded of a good or service to a change in its price when nothing but the price changes.
2) a measure of the effect of a price change or a change in the quantity supplied on the demand for a product or service.
1-0-1 seems to be doing me just fine, chap.
Not certain the casual fan who is going up on a spur of the moment thing will give a hoot about Man City and the television money. All he will see is Man City in the Champions League =£26, or Coventry City v Accrington Stanley=£26.The money Man City will get for it being on TV will probably be multiple times our income for the season. You could probably have no fans in the ground and they wouldn't make a loss.
If its spur of the moment won't they just look at our price and decide yes or no. Can't imagine people think 'I fancy going to the match this afternoon, let me just check what Man City charge in the Champions League first'.Not certain the casual fan who is going up on a spur of the moment thing will give a hoot about Man City and the television money. All he will see is Man City in the Champions League =£26, or Coventry City v Accrington Stanley=£26.
Yep-but in comparison it makes our prices at L1 level seem a bit excessive.If its spur of the moment won't they just look at our price and decide yes or no. Can't imagine people think 'I fancy going to the match this afternoon, let me just check what Man City charge in the Champions League first'.
Yep-but in comparison it makes our prices at L1 level seem a bit excessive.
Excuses, excuses. Poor gates IMO. Look at Sunderland, relegated twice, ownership issues, look at Portsmouth at capacity or near as home game, steadfast support. Barnsley just a few thousand bigger population than Nuneaton yet bigger gates than us despite relegation.
If we were in the Championship the excuse would be "we are not in the Premier League"
Those that go have my utmost respect, those that say they support Coventry City but avoid the Ricoh like they would catch ebola have my contempt.
This team deserve better and the manager deserves better.
There is no product “gulf” between paint balling.
They are excessive for league One, I paid £50 for two tickets on Saturday because my match package wouldn't work. Friends who are fans if other clubs are always surprised that's the price on the day.Yep-but in comparison it makes our prices at L1 level seem a bit excessive.
They are not excessive for league one, they are slightly above average. If you go to Yeovil and don't want to stand you have to pay £25 for that hole.They are excessive for league One, I paid £50 for two tickets on Saturday because my match package wouldn't work. Friends who are fans if other clubs are always surprised that's the price on the day.
Match packages and ST are good value but the prices need to be looked at. I'll be upgrading to a ST next year providing we've still got a home & robins is in charge.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
You we’re making the comparison initially. You said at £26 it doesn’t matter if nobody turns up at Man City?There are some really shit ones and some really good ones. Same with Go Karting and other leisure things.
In fact, if you support a football team why would you have to compare with somebody like Man City to go as a spur of the moment?
You we’re making the comparison initially. You said at £26 it doesn’t matter if nobody turns up at Man City?
So we are paying for the facilities then? Ok, let’s play devils advocate-would you prefer to stand on a terrace for £15-£18 or sit in a seat (let’s say the Ricoh) for £26?They are not excessive for league one, they are slightly above average. If you go to Yeovil and don't want to stand you have to pay £25 for that hole.
Football is expensive in general but we're not an outlier, our prices are in line with the league and better value if you factor in the quality of facilities.
Yes, which in comparison for L1 football (Coventry City v Accrington Stanley) is good value to watch the Champions League at the Etihad for the same price (£26) :emoji_thumbsup:Yes, in reply to somebody mentioning the price at Man City.
So we are paying for the facilities then? Ok, let’s play devils advocate-would you prefer to stand on a terrace for £15-£18 or sit in a seat (let’s say the Ricoh) for £26?
Think most would opt for the terrace.
Yes, which in comparison for L1 football (Coventry City v Accrington Stanley) is good value to watch the Champions League at the Etihad for the same price (£26) :emoji_thumbsup:
What are you even on about now. I said that we're not even paying any more but we get better facilities. If were using your model let's rip some of the seats out and charge more as people would prefer it.So we are paying for the facilities then? Ok, let’s play devils advocate-would you prefer to stand on a terrace for £15-£18 or sit in a seat (let’s say the Ricoh) for £26?
Think most would opt for the terrace.
Yes, which in comparison for L1 football (Coventry City v Accrington Stanley) is good value to watch the Champions League at the Etihad for the same price (£26) :emoji_thumbsup:
Football clubs business model is more like a console manufacturer or tech company. Hook customers into your ecosystem and extract value over the lifetime.
You gotta spend your cash on acquisition, then squeeze the pips of the loyal base that can’t escape.
If you’re doing football as a business, that’s the model. Easy to join, hard to leave. Lots of upsells and extras.
First one's free
I was at the Wimbledon game
#Me too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?