As you are you mean? What you should really do is make comment at it being brought up then rather than moan at me for replying to it, when you are also.
You mean just after it happened? Hardly the same as flogging a dead horse is it.I revert to your comments after the Bolton game then.
There was, they got taken over by Coventry United and rebranded.There's no such team as Coventry City Ladies FC.
Are you just being obtuse or do you really not understand? I'll try and make it as easy as possible for you.I know. But CCC didn't rush off and insert it. It was a historic clause before you probably realised Coventry Rugby played at the Butts and before SISU talked bollocks about being interested in it. I think you have just invented the "professional" football bit. It was a historic clause to protect the site for Coventry Rugby club.
Its Coventry City Girls. 1st Team - Coventry City Girls FC Official Website
There was, they got taken over by Coventry United and rebranded.
the council immediately moved to have a clause added to the lease preventing professional football.
Your original post quoted. The way you worded it sounded like CCC actually added the clause!! Which was misleading. That was my point.
What is misleading. As soon as the council were aware of the club talking to CRFC about a groundshare they made moves to insert a clause in the lease that would make that impossible.Your original post quoted. The way you worded it sounded like CCC actually added the clause!! Which was misleading. That was my point.
What is misleading. As soon as the council were aware of the club talking to CRFC about a groundshare they made moves to insert a clause in the lease that would make that impossible.
I am, that's why my original post was pointing out that the way this has played out works in Fishers favour. He can go to the FL, if Wasps continue to refuse to talk to the club, and say there is no choice other than to leave the city again.Deal with the present
I am, that's why my original post was pointing out that the way this has played out works in Fishers favour. He can go to the FL, if Wasps continue to refuse to talk to the club, and say there is no choice other than to leave the city again.
As I said in my original post the FL aren't going to do any digging and its not a court case where both sides of the argument are presented. Fisher will present the clubs sides and show the press reports of CCC moving to block any Butts groundshare.
Coventry City Girls play in West Midland Regional Women's Football League Division One South, tier 6 of Women's Football
Cov United Ladies Coventry United Ladies Football Club : Home play in FA Women's Premier League Southern Division, tier 3 of Women's Football
No idea, I was convinced he wouldn't go through with it last time and he did.Do you think he will? Where too?
Not that its likely to happen but could you in theory have the speedway sharing with a football team without having a massive gap between the fans and the pitch? Think they've had speedway at the millennium stadium before.I wish that Nuneaton Town was the answer but they are having their own issues as are Coventry speedway so local seems to be a non starter unless something could be done at BPA.
Not that its likely to happen but could you in theory have the speedway sharing with a football team without having a massive gap between the fans and the pitch? Think they've had speedway at the millennium stadium before.
No idea, I was convinced he wouldn't go through with it last time and he did.
The assumption at the moment appears to be we will be offered another short term deal but there doesn't seem much evidence to support that. What happens if ACL continue to refuse to speak to the club. As we keep being told the Butts is a non starter so where would we play?
And Nick's favourite reporter is on the case.. :angelic:
Coventry Rugby rule out any Butts Park plan involving CCFC owners
Oh the irony..Strange how you try to bring me into something again, while you are thinking of me you can reply to my PMs?
Oh the irony..
And Nick's favourite reporter is on the case.. :angelic:
Coventry Rugby rule out any Butts Park plan involving CCFC owners
I know some people see them as interchangeable but that clearly to me says SISU not CCFC. Maybe if we had the context it would be clear he meant CCFC as a whole but equally it could be "I haven't ruled out working with the football club but I have certainly firmly ruled out any involvement with Sisu".But asked today if any involvement with the football club had now been ruled out, Mr Sharp said: “I have certainly firmly ruled out any involvement with Sisu.”
Would be interesting to hear the interview in full to see the context of the quote used.
I know some people see them as interchangeable but that clearly to me says SISU not CCFC. Maybe if we had the context it would be clear he meant CCFC as a whole but equally it could be "I haven't ruled out working with the football club but I have certainly firmly ruled out any involvement with Sisu".
If its been ruled out completely it would be good to get more detail as it was Sharp who first said they were talking about this. If its down to Fisher messing it up more fuel for the fire.
Suck on that Joy..................that's the "preferred option" down the tubes. Good.
Suck on that Joy..................that's the "preferred option" down the tubes. Good.
You haven't read this board before, have you.Not sure why everyone finds that so objectionable.
No, there's only one decent option and that's staying at the Ricoh. Not sure why everyone finds that so objectionable.
Fisher: 'CRFC will not deal with the fans after their protest. Your behaviour is despicable.'
CRFC: 'CRFC will not deal with SISU as they are unethical. Their behaviour is despicable.'
I would love him to be on the phone in this week just to say 'no Tim, it wasn't the protest, it was you and your team of wankers that got in the way of any deal at the BPA.'
Hasn't everyone?Interesting quote......
But asked today if any involvement with the football club had now been ruled out, Mr Sharp said: “I have certainly firmly ruled out any involvement with Sisu.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?