NortonSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
They could do with a different approach to their relationships, that much is clear.
They could do with a different approach to their relationships, that much is clear.Hasn't everyone?
Interesting quote......
But asked today if any involvement with the football club had now been ruled out, Mr Sharp said: “I have certainly firmly ruled out any involvement with Sisu.”
Interesting quote......
But asked today if any involvement with the football club had now been ruled out, Mr Sharp said: “I have certainly firmly ruled out any involvement with Sisu.”
I
Sharpe said it would hold 25,000 - so you know better. Are you an architect?
I cant help wondering if Mr Sharp is being very careful with his words in this statement. He doesn't rule out dealing with CCFC, more it seems to me rules out direct involvement with SISU in the project
Yep. Seems abundantly clear. He made a point of saying Sisu.I cant help wondering if Mr Sharp is being very careful with his words in this statement. He doesn't rule out dealing with CCFC, more it seems to me rules out direct involvement with SISU in the project
It is weird he says that.
Would be good to know the question put to him
I would guess the question was asked during his interview with the CT. You can read what you want into the fact the answer isn't contained in the article.Would be good to know the question put to him
Why is it weird?
Because again, it is carefully chosen wording isn't it.
The question would now be to ask him to rule out working with CCFC
Or when he says he firmly rules out SISU, in reply say "So does that rule out CCFC too" and see what he says or his reaction.
He already is working with CCFC. The ticket office for starters.
I think its pretty clear. Things like the ticket office, using the facilities are fine. That's dealing with the club.
Things like redeveloping the BPA in a joint venture with CCFC means investment. That means dealing with SISU. That's what he's ruled out.
Nothing weird about that all things considered.
So there is no harm in 100% confirming it by asking about CCFC and not just leaving it at that comment then surely? His reply is carefully worded.
The fact that we continue to have a ticket office at BPA and have used the facilities for social events doesn't confirm that?
I'm talking about the topic we are on about here, not the ticket office
He worded his reply carefully so it's left wide open, rather than just confirming that and clearing it up. The fact it isn't cleared up is weird.
Do you think he is open to dealing with a different owner if CCFC.
Or
Do you think he wanted to make a point of saying he just does not want to do business with SISU.
Or
Do you think it was just a fruediant slip as everyone knows SISU is who you do business with, not CCFC so it doesn't matter what he called it. It's simply that there isn't any plans from either side.
I'm talking about the topic we are on about here, not the ticket office
He worded his reply carefully so it's left wide open, rather than just confirming that and clearing it up. The fact it isn't cleared up is weird.
No it isn't weird, it is leaving his options open like a sensible business person. Words mean nothing unless acted upon.
Maybe we can use the Ricoh on big games like the first game when SISU leave or a plum tie with Chelsea then go back to the butts after that...Can't help but think shrinking the Club to the point that the Butts becomes a straightforward simple fit could be desirable to our Chairman.
Be interested to know If there is another vote on the use of 3/4G pitches in this division or if it's already permitted a league lower.
They could do with a different approach to their relationships, that much is clear.
It's true enough that the Ricoh doesn't suit and feels soulless and desperate with a mere 8K rattling around in it.Maybe we can use the Ricoh on big games like the first game when SISU leave or a plum tie with Chelsea then go back to the butts after that...
Couldn't agree more!Frankly pissed off with much/all of this. In particular.......
I wish that CCFC and CRFC would simply state what the plan is, make it clear to everyone and stick to it. Forget all the clever talk, in plain English what is the plan and with who & when, how will it work or be funded. A plan we can get behind and help drive through
It is clear that now any thing goes wrong the implication it is because the fans don't simply just support the team/club protests damage the club. Do they really think most fans are that gullible. Team form affected by protests, results affected by protests, fans aren't spending enough because of protests, fans don't have blind faith and ask questions( how dare they), the owners are upset because they cant get their own way because of the fans and others, a new ground at the BPA for CCFC is at risk because of fans protests. I assume new owners are at risk because of the fans etc................. how many excuses do TF JS and SISU need for totally screwing up..... it is always someone elses fault. It was CCC, ACL, Wasps now its the fans their major source of income. Perhaps if our owners cared, had a plan and knew how to run a football club not drive in to the ground, didn't prioritise investment losses for unknown money men above all else in managing CCFC then the fans might not feel a great and often desperate need to protest. I have never seen owners of any business try so hard to alienate its customers
Wouldn't be protests if the owners and directors were not calamitous in running the club from day 1. The fans are entitled to their say, they provide the funds that keep the club afloat
and finally this constant dick waving between the CT & Observer in the shape of the respective hacks involved. Grow up and get the real questions asked and answered in clear language, I don't care who is gods gift to reporting get some proper answers on player sales, new grounds, academy, Ryton, training grounds, the plan and not least WHY
and breathe, feel a little better for that - have a good night folks
Well unless we're saying that's a misquote then it seems pretty clear to me. Its SISU and not CCFC that the rugby club won't deal with. Now of course that doesn't mean a groundshare is any more likely than it was yesterday but it again raises the question of what would Sharp have to gain by playing along with BS from Fisher?“The board of Coventry rugby cannot deal with Sisu given the anti-Sisu sentiment in the city.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?