they’re mistaking robin’s magic for our owners being good.
My thinking went along a similar route after posting. Would we be where we are without Robins? Probably not.
That said, we do at least seem to be employing a sustainable model now, which gives me more confidence in the long term future of the club
Yeah debt to the owners. It’s despicable and increases their grip on us.Aren’t we in as much debt as before Sisu took over with more added each year?
I don't know if it is as high as when they arrived but it is certainly substantial and increasing. The level of interest charged is high, though i'm not sure what you'd realistically compare it to if trying to qork out if we're being exploited or not.Aren’t we in as much debt as before Sisu took over with more added each year?
I don't know if it is as high as when they arrived but it is certainly substantial and increasing. The level of interest charged is high, though i'm not sure what you'd realistically compare it to if trying to qork out if we're being exploited or not.
I haven't read the article but i'd have thought we are being run 'better than most of the shitshows in the division' as opposed to 'well'.
It was more the word “sustainable” I had an issue with. We’re about as sustainable as my daughter is self sufficient, in that she is until I get sick of her and make her actually support herself. Not a worry while she’s six, but when she’s thirty I may have a very different view. And of course I have a plan to ensure my daughter does get to self sufficiency before then, which I’ve not seen from Sisu.
While they are paying their investors a much higher interest rate than they can get elsewhere, I guess they are relying on them never asking for their investment backId have to go looking for some comparisons across the division but i suspect loads of teams need money putting in from the ownership, cant see many being sustainable from that point of view. I find the lack of a clear long-term plan for the future troubling too, how long is a hedge-fund content to cover losses at high interest rates? Or is that the plan now? If so, doesn't suggest we're ever likely to be set up for 'success'
It reads like things changed when Boddy came in.
That should get someone going at least....
Not convinced 'we chat about building a new stadium now and again' is a reason for a tick in the 'well run' box...
I read their linked article about the Nottingham Forest owner too. That made me chuckle.A well run club that has no assets and no leaseholder value. Yeah how convincing
Well yes we moved to Birmingham - Daves speciality is moving clubs around
Here he is ;-)
List Boddys achievements
Astonishing turn around really
Don't know why anyone would have it in for Boddy
He's only an employee and on balance has done a good job
we know there is the debt and the interest etc - but there is no doubt that the model is a lot better than it has been and a lot better than other clubs . Very few football clubs are run well, but we are certainly nowhere near the relegation zone
We are certainly in a better position now than we were when SISU took over - i guess against that, is the competition has moved on in terms of quality and spending power etc which unfortunately leaves us further away from the promised land
Astonishing turn around really
Don't know why anyone would have it in for Boddy
He's only an employee and on balance has done a good job
I'm not his biographer.
I did however mention on another thread the other day how I feel the club has progressed in his time here. Is he responsible for all of it - no. Should he take some credit as the CEO - yes. Has he/the club go everything right in the last 5 years - no? Are we as a football club (not a business) in a better position than 5 years ago - yes.
Crack open your spreadsheet - you should find it in seconds.
So you’re saying it’s Dave Boddy’s fault that Wasps wouldn’t offer us a new deal? Maybe you think Dave had the authority to stop SISU’s legal pursuits. Or maybe you’re just talking bollocks.Well yes we moved to Birmingham - Daves speciality is moving clubs around
So fisher I assume should take even more credit?
Still just an employee GHe has a title of CEO - that’s a bit more than just an employee
I read an article today that said Burnley were being charged 9% interest on their loans.I don't know if it is as high as when they arrived but it is certainly substantial and increasing. The level of interest charged is high, though i'm not sure what you'd realistically compare it to if trying to qork out if we're being exploited or not.
I haven't read the article but i'd have thought we are being run 'better than most of the shitshows in the division' as opposed to 'well'.
Well yes we moved to Birmingham - Daves speciality is moving clubs around
Tbf that was a very last minute thing. I had very close info at the time that it 100% wasn't going to be Birmingham and that came from Boddy. Whatever the rights and wrongs of what happened (and I'm not getting into the pissing contest between you, G or anyone one else) I do know that we already had an agreement with Burton to share that had been sanctioned by the EFL. Goodness only knows where we would be now had that happened.But it wasn't Boddy's fault we moved to Northampton. Fisher was the culprit then. Whoever was at fault for forcing the departure, at least Boddy got us a decent ground closer than The Cobblers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?