fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Oh have a day off. Nobody forced the council to make a deal with Wasps.
Sounds like a few on here are really quite apathetic to the on going demise, their only defence to inaction being it should be aimed at Wasps and the Council as well. Those latter two are only products of the gross negligence of the club by it's incompetent and culpable owners. I fucking hate these hedge fund bastards but also condemn both CCC and the franchise shits from London but it's SISU that own and control the club, only THEY can offer us to the market in hope of a suitable buyer before they destroy us altogether, no one else !
Yep, also said if any ccfc fans went to watch ccfc if we moved to Bermuda park would be selfish.They had the nerve to ask away fans to boycott Sixfields matches yet attended the first Wasps' game in Coventry. That was the moment I knew I was no longer a Trust fan. Jan even said why should the Trust give a "fuck" about Wasps' existing fans.
Would that be the season we only had 3/4 of a ground whilst the "Kop" was flattened to build the new stand?
"Following the 'Taylor Report’ in 1990 City, with almost 18,000 seats out of a capacity of 26,000, were well placed to meet the report’s recommendations that all top division grounds should be all-seater by August 1994. The Sky Blues were founder members of the Premiership in 1992 and in the summer of 1993, work commenced on the new East Stand and the team played its home games to a three-sided stadium for one season whilst the new stand rose from the wreck of the flattened Kop."
Read more at http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/...ty-jim-brown-2432398.aspx#5FsX8pBOkBLH11qE.99
Oh have a day off. Nobody forced the council to make a deal with Wasps.
Yes, the capacity was 17k, the gate was still some way below it. What's your point caller? It sounds a bit better I suppose to be 59% the reduced capacity. It would have been less than 50% of the seasons either side of it.
People did not stop going just because the East Stand was being rebuilt. I was at plenty of games at Highfield Rd that had similar gates.
And nobody forced the City to be taken to Sixfields to the echo's of "We've played our last game at the Ricoh" and "That ship has long sailed"
And nobody forced the City to be taken to Sixfields to the echo's of "We've played our last game at the Ricoh" and "That ship has long sailed"
Who will take notice and rectify 'the situation' - what is 'the situation'?
And nobody forced the City to be taken to Sixfields to the echo's of "We've played our last game at the Ricoh" and "That ship has long sailed"
Yes, the capacity was 17k, the gate was still some way below it. What's your point caller? It sounds a bit better I suppose to be 59% the reduced capacity. It would have been less than 50% of the seasons either side of it.
People did not stop going just because the East Stand was being rebuilt. I was at plenty of games at Highfield Rd that had similar gates.
At this point you'd normally be posting pictures of football goals being moved.[/QUOTE]Did you ever go to HR when all entrance to the ground was "ALL TICKET" making it almost impossible for most fans to get to the ground to buy a ticket?... This went on for quite a few years.
It's just that originally you cited the east stand being closed as the reason for poor attendance. Then when that was shot down it became that Highfield Road almost impossible to get into. Hence the goals moving.At this point you'd normally be posting pictures of football goals being moved.
At this point you'd normally be posting pictures of football goals being moved.[/QUOTE]Did you ever go to HR when all entrance to the ground was "ALL TICKET" making it almost impossible for most fans to get to the ground to buy a ticket?... This went on for quite a few years.
It's just that originally you cited the east stand being closed as the reason for poor attendance. Then when that was shot down it became that Highfield Road almost impossible to get into. Hence the goals moving.
It's just that originally you cited the east stand being closed as the reason for poor attendance. Then when that was shot down it became that Highfield Road almost impossible to get into. Hence the goals moving.
It wasn't so much a put down, more of a fact. If you Google hard enough you'll find out what one of those is.So you agree with FP's "Put down" of City fans then?
And if YOU open your eyes and read my post #188 YOU might not have to google!It wasn't so much a put down, more of a fact. If you Google hard enough you'll find out what one of those is.
A fact?... A fact of what?It wasn't so much a put down, more of a fact. If you Google hard enough you'll find out what one of those is.
Wasn't there one fan in a wheelchair who invaded the pitch?When Blackpool fans did it, it wasn't 'embarrassing', received widespread attention
A fact?... A fact of what?
It wasn't so much a put down, more of a fact. If you Google hard enough you'll find out what one of those is.
I had merely stated that the gate was 10,409 on that Sunday afternoon in the Premier League. You assumed it was a put down. That assumption then led you to defend the gate based firstly on the fact that a stand was closed, then on a chance that the match might have been all ticket.
You really are a card, stay off the altar wine.
I had merely stated that the gate was 10,409 on that Sunday afternoon in the Premier League. You assumed it was a put down. That assumption then led you to defend the gate based firstly on the fact that a stand was closed, then on a chance that the match might have been all ticket.
You really are a card, stay off the altar wine.
But you're the one on the ground
SISU 'Concerned'..........are you for real ! They couldn't give a fiddlers fuck about anything other than profit !Your right. Wasps made similar statements about staying in London. Sisu and moonstone are cut from the same cloth. Therefore to not look silly, we should treat them similarly.
Is this not the common ground amongst fans? Is it not something we all agree on? CCFC and wasps should never have been moved. Particularly for financial gain.
I personally believe, if everyone was targeted in this sorry mess, sisu would be more concerned. We should go after anyone that has a detrimental effect on our football club.That anyone who does will have the full force of our fan base against them. That no matter who or what you are nobody is damaging our football club. Just my opinion.
while I agree with pretty much everything you say there will never be consensus about how much the council have fucked the club over until sisu have left.Your right. Wasps made similar statements about staying in London. Sisu and moonstone are cut from the same cloth. Therefore to not look silly, we should treat them similarly.
Is this not the common ground amongst fans? Is it not something we all agree on? CCFC and wasps should never have been moved. Particularly for financial gain.
I personally believe, if everyone was targeted in this sorry mess, sisu would be more concerned. We should go after anyone that has a detrimental effect on our football club.That anyone who does will have the full force of our fan base against them. That no matter who or what you are nobody is damaging our football club. Just my opinion.
while I agree with pretty much everything you say there will never be consensus about how much the council have fucked the club over until sisu have left.
If, as I suspect, CCC don't roll over to help the new owners then everyone will see them for what they are.
If they do, then the likes of me and you will have been wrong and it was just a beef with sisu all along.
But the first step has to be sisu going.
Sky Blue Kid jumping from meltdown to meltdown up in this thread!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sky Blue Kid jumping from meltdown to meltdown up in this thread!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sky Blue Kid jumping from meltdown to meltdown up in this thread!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Most threads to be fair. Be careful he'll have you for slander.
And then you will say you are sending your name and address via PM but then bottle out of it. Loser.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?