The Sixfields Sixty? (1 Viewer)

ecky · Jan 10, 2014

So, 60 season ticket holders went last night, this shows the state of our situation.
I hope the sixty sheep enjoyed their evening with tea and biscuits afterward... You make me want to puke
Sandra garlick is out to just promote herself and doesn't represent me, all In all the whole sorry saga is turning into a farce

covmark · Jan 10, 2014

ecky said:
So, 60 season ticket holders went last night, this shows the state of our situation.
I hope the sixty sheep enjoyed their evening with tea and biscuits afterward... You make me want to puke
Sandra garlick is out to just promote herself and doesn't represent me, all In all the whole sorry saga is turning into a farce

what a waste of a thread

thaiskyblue · Jan 10, 2014

who will they roll out next ?, we've had Les Reid, nikki sincliar, mark labovitch and now Sandra Garlick ?, this is absolutely ridiculous, the football league need to sort this charade out now.

ecky · Jan 10, 2014

You would say that as you went

covmark · Jan 10, 2014

ecky said:
You would say that as you went

Afraid not

wafw1971 · Jan 10, 2014

The football league have no authority over a private business of which CCFC is, the only thing they can do is kick us out of the league. Do you want this to happen?

magic82ball · Jan 10, 2014

wafw1971 said:
The football league have no authority over a private business of which CCFC is, the only thing they can do is kick us out of the league. Do you want this to happen?

At least if there was a realistic threat of this happening, SISU might think twice with their actions.

Covlad65 · Jan 10, 2014

ecky you are a complete knob........people like you are causing the rift between supporters!

spongebob · Jan 10, 2014

no stu people like you are !!!!

mrtrench · Jan 10, 2014

No, spongebob - you are.

DazzleTommyDazzle · Jan 10, 2014

wafw1971 said:
The football league have no authority over a private business of which CCFC is, the only thing they can do is kick us out of the league. Do you want this to happen?

Are you saying that the only sanction that the league can use against any of its members is to expel them?

If so, I think that you are wrong.

I think that the league has a number of things that it can do. Whether it has the courage to use them against a member that is perceived to be litigious is another question altogether.

Otis · Jan 10, 2014

covmark said:
what a waste of a thread

What a waste of good biscuits!

letsallsingtogether · Jan 10, 2014

No Sisu are and some of you still don't see it .
Oh well will be to late soon.

Covlad65 said:
ecky you are a complete knob........people like you are causing the rift between supporters!

The Gentleman · Jan 10, 2014

Covlad65 said:
ecky you are a complete knob........people like you are causing the rift between supporters!

And calling someone a knob doesn't piss people off ? I think you'll find the biggest cause of a rift is Sisu/Otium, would there be things like Sixfields Sixty, Hilliers, Mongs, Scabs, Sheep etc if we were back at the Ricoh. Sisu/Otium have the power to heal this rift but choose not to because a united fanbase is a lot harder to deal with if they are all against you.

RegTheDonk · Jan 10, 2014

I think even the so called "superfans" must think this is a pie in the sky. 400 ST holders (I belive its around that amount?), but only 60 went to this meeting?

If I was Garlick I'd be pretty disappointed by this turn out.

Sky Blue Kid · Jan 10, 2014

covmark...what a waste of a thread........................................................................................Says the man who's been a member of SBT since April 2010, and has started THREE(3) threads.....Never have an opinion Ecky, unless it coincides with covmark's.

wafw1971 · Jan 10, 2014

DazzleTommyDazzle said:
Are you saying that the only sanction that the league can use against any of its members is to expel them?

If so, I think that you are wrong.

I think that the league has a number of things that it can do. Whether it has the courage to use them against a member that is perceived to be litigious is another question altogether.

This is a quote from The Football League (from the Trust website) 'As you know, The Football League have made it a condition of continued membership for Coventry City that the Club must return to Coventry'

My question then is what can the football league do if say in 5 years and CCFC still haven't returned to Coventry?

If the dock CCFC points or kick them out the league can you imagine what Sisu/Otium would do. I cam imagine that they would be taken to court and then they would back down like they did with the golden share shambles.

thaiskyblue · Jan 10, 2014

wafw1971 said:
The football league have no authority over a private business of which CCFC is, the only thing they can do is kick us out of the league. Do you want this to happen?

something's got to happen, we are a laughing stock, cheers sisu, happy new year.

italiahorse · Jan 10, 2014

wafw1971 said:
The football league have no authority over a private business of which CCFC is, the only thing they can do is kick us out of the league. Do you want this to happen?

They should at least push Sisu on their plans particularly in light of there are no authorities being talker to.
If it forces liquidation or whatever then sooner than later.

edgy · Jan 10, 2014

More diversive bullshit by the OP. Some people are getting as bad as the people they hate so much for it.

DazzleTommyDazzle · Jan 10, 2014

wafw1971 said:
This is a quote from The Football League (from the Trust website) 'As you know, The Football League have made it a condition of continued membership for Coventry City that the Club must return to Coventry'

My question then is what can the football league do if say in 5 years and CCFC still haven't returned to Coventry?

If the dock CCFC points or kick them out the league can you imagine what Sisu/Otium would do. I cam imagine that they would be taken to court and then they would back down like they did with the golden share shambles.

It seems that we agree that it is not a question of what they have the power to do, but a question of what they have the will to do.

matesx · Jan 10, 2014

you're a crap fan!

no you are
nooo you are
no... you are
i said it first
did not
did too
well anyway you are a SISU rentboy, enjoy Shitfields
i will im a real FAN
no you're not
yes i am
you're a crap fan
no you are
nooo you are

another day on SBT

Nick · Jan 10, 2014

edgy said:
More diversive bullshit by the OP. Some people are getting as bad as the people they hate so much for it.

Exactly. It is the same as these newsletters "We hate the club for dividing the fans". "Dont go to the games, go to watch a band at this pub" etc etc.

Yes, SISU aren't blameless in anything but it is the fans who are dividing themselves.

hill83 · Jan 10, 2014

matesx said:
you're a crap fan!

no you are
nooo you are
no... you are
i said it first
did not
did too
well anyway you are a SISU rentboy, enjoy Shitfields
i will im a real FAN
no you're not
yes i am
you're a crap fan
no you are
nooo you are

another day on SBT

Very poor structure to that post. Must try harder. 3/10

ollyservetta · Jan 10, 2014

put the handbags away girls ,its getting embarrassing

covmark · Jan 10, 2014

Sky Blue Kid said:
covmark...what a waste of a thread........................................................................................Says the man who's been a member of SBT since April 2010, and has started THREE(3) threads.....Never have an opinion Ecky, unless it coincides with covmark's.

Morning village idiot, watched any phantom football matches on the internet recently?

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 10, 2014

wafw1971 said:
The football league have no authority over a private business of which CCFC is, the only thing they can do is kick us out of the league. Do you want this to happen?

Absolutely right!

That is why as supporters we are screwed

wafw1971 · Jan 10, 2014

italiahorse said:
They should at least push Sisu on their plans particularly in light of there are no authorities being talker to.
If it forces liquidation or whatever then sooner than later.

Would you prefer liquidation? I certainly wouldn't.

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 10, 2014

It's also why mk dons happened and why the rules were changed. However it would be a brave football league to say no to a change of location at the expense of losing a football club

blueflint · Jan 10, 2014

letsallsingtogether said:
No Sisu are and some of you still don't see it .
Oh well will be to late soon.

already too late

blueflint · Jan 10, 2014

Nick said:
Exactly. It is the same as these newsletters "We hate the club for dividing the fans". "Dont go to the games, go to watch a band at this pub" etc etc.

Yes, SISU aren't blameless in anything but it is the fans who are dividing themselves.

no nick its defo ```````sisu dividing us with their utter bullshit and its people like yourself who can't see it.divide and conquer

Bill Glazier · Jan 10, 2014

Doesn't the league have the right to insist Sisu return the club to the Ricoh if it's clear there is no intention to build a new stadium, and now the financial argument for moving has collapsed?

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 10, 2014

Bill Glazier said:
Doesn't the league have the right to insist Sisu return the club to the Ricoh if it's clear there is no intention to build a new stadium, and now the financial argument for moving has collapsed?

cant see how they can insist

Broken Hearted Sky Blue · Jan 10, 2014

Nick said:
Exactly. It is the same as these newsletters "We hate the club for dividing the fans". "Dont go to the games, go to watch a band at this pub" etc etc.

Yes, SISU aren't blameless in anything but it is the fans who are dividing themselves.

Rubbish before this sorry saga the fans were united in one thing that is CCFC,yes they had different pinions on managers ,players referees etc. What we have now is still a love for CCFC however the fanbase is being divided by one entity and that is Sisu as I've said before a united fanbase is their worst nightmare. While this goes on the fans wil stay divided however look at the division 90% not attending Sixfields 10% attending(the majority under duress) now look at it again is there division?
We have divided ourselves into NOPM,KCIC etc but they are basically the same thing they are all derivatives of the original Save Our City by the way where has that gone:thinking about:Knock all these other things on the head and bring it back one message one slogan because believe me Save Our City now actually means something.

Bill Glazier · Jan 10, 2014

Take away the golden share and auction it?

The Sixfields Sixty? (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency