The stats point to why our strikers are not scoring as many as we want them to (1 Viewer)

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Taken from an article by the sack race where they look at our seasons rise.

The data behind Coventry’s rise
Coventry have been interesting in the data.

They create a lot of chances, the fifth most in League One at the time of writing yet their xG suggests these opportunities are not high quality given they are the seventh worst for xG in the division.

They have been excellent at the back conceding just 28 times in the league this season, only Sunderland have allowed less goals (26) against while their xGA backs this up, being the fourth best in the third tier.

You could argue that Robins should look for ways to create better scoring chances, but his team are doing just fine and as long as the defence remains solid, they should keep winning, or at least not losing.



(Doesn't this explain why our strikers do not get the return we would hope for or atleast in part give an explanation of sort ... Not trying to argue btw)
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Taken from an article by the sack race where they look at our seasons rise.

The data behind Coventry’s rise
Coventry have been interesting in the data.

They create a lot of chances, the fifth most in League One at the time of writing yet their xG suggests these opportunities are not high quality given they are the seventh worst for xG in the division.

They have been excellent at the back conceding just 28 times in the league this season, only Sunderland have allowed less goals (26) against while their xGA backs this up, being the fourth best in the third tier.

You could argue that Robins should look for ways to create better scoring chances, but his team are doing just fine and as long as the defence remains solid, they should keep winning, or at least not losing.



(Doesn't this explain why our strikers do not get the return we would hope for or atleast in part give an explanation of sort ... Not trying to argue btw)


Article explaining Xg and how it's calculated

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...DhAI&usg=AOvVaw1EU-wgO3BH12eVLw7eQImx&ampcf=1
 

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
As long as we are scoring goals I couldn't care less who scores them.

There's more to a strikers game than scoring goals. Godden's movement, Bakas hold up and Biamous strength have all been contributing factors as to why we have managed to open teams up.

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Taken from an article by the sack race where they look at our seasons rise.

The data behind Coventry’s rise
Coventry have been interesting in the data.

They create a lot of chances, the fifth most in League One at the time of writing yet their xG suggests these opportunities are not high quality given they are the seventh worst for xG in the division.

They have been excellent at the back conceding just 28 times in the league this season, only Sunderland have allowed less goals (26) against while their xGA backs this up, being the fourth best in the third tier.

You could argue that Robins should look for ways to create better scoring chances, but his team are doing just fine and as long as the defence remains solid, they should keep winning, or at least not losing.



(Doesn't this explain why our strikers do not get the return we would hope for or atleast in part give an explanation of sort ... Not trying to argue btw)

Was a similar story last season. Only last season we were creating lots of good chances but being wasteful.
This season we don't seem to be creating anywhere near as much.
At this stage of proceedings performances and battering teams is very much out the window anyway in my opinion. All about getting results by hook or by crook now.
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
Taken from an article by the sack race where they look at our seasons rise.

The data behind Coventry’s rise
Coventry have been interesting in the data.

They create a lot of chances, the fifth most in League One at the time of writing yet their xG suggests these opportunities are not high quality given they are the seventh worst for xG in the division.

They have been excellent at the back conceding just 28 times in the league this season, only Sunderland have allowed less goals (26) against while their xGA backs this up, being the fourth best in the third tier.

You could argue that Robins should look for ways to create better scoring chances, but his team are doing just fine and as long as the defence remains solid, they should keep winning, or at least not losing.



(Doesn't this explain why our strikers do not get the return we would hope for or atleast in part give an explanation of sort ... Not trying to argue btw)

Overanalysing
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Its obvious we dont make as many clear cut chances as other teams. Hence strikers dont have much to feed on alot of the timr


But it is working!
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
As long as we are scoring goals I couldn't care less who scores them.

There's more to a strikers game than scoring goals. Godden's movement, Bakas hold up and Biamous strength have all been contributing factors as to why we have managed to open teams up.

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk

Agreed.

And this formation lends itself to the midfielders contributing with more goals than we have seen in previous years. As you say the lone striker does a lot of the donkey work and that allows the midfielders to get amongst the goals.

Last season our midfielders scored a total of 19 goals. This season they have scored 22 with a third of the season to go.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top