The sub change last night (1 Viewer)

The Lurker · Mar 11, 2015

Yes I know Phillips was injured but that JOB one was strange one. Yes he was carrying a knock but why not bring on finch? Like for like. Instead that 4-3-3 formation lost us all 3 points. If SP made the same decision there would have been uproar.

Huckerby · Mar 11, 2015

You should have applied for the job pal

stupot07 · Mar 11, 2015

433? It was more 424.

He could have also brought turgott on who's supposed to be a winger.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

ccfctommy · Mar 11, 2015

I was told JOB pulled a hamstring.

Astute · Mar 11, 2015

SP would have brought on another defender and invited them to attack us. I know what I prefer.

stupot07 · Mar 11, 2015

Astute said:
SP would have brought on another defender and invited them to attack us. I know what I prefer.

Although by putting another attacker on it invited bradford to attack, nouble and samuel didn't track back and yeates and the left back in particular were left 2 v1 against Pennington and attacked at will.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

4waspsting · Mar 11, 2015

ccfctommy said:
I was told JOB pulled a hamstring.

more like pulled his nob

4waspsting · Mar 11, 2015

The Lurker said:
Yes I know Phillips was injured but that JOB one was strange one. Yes he was carrying a knock but why not bring on finch? Like for like. Instead that 4-3-3 formation lost us all 3 points. If SP made the same decision there would have been uproar.

They all look like a bunch of strange fuckers

Otis · Mar 11, 2015

stupot07 said:
433? It was more 424.

He could have also brought turgott on who's supposed to be a winger.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Yep it 4-2-4. While I applaud Mowbray's bravery, it was a big risk. In saying that however we did carve out a couple of excellent chances when we changed formation and you have to think had we kept it the same it would probably just have been another MK bombardment.

coop · Mar 11, 2015

If prosdick had of scored from 5 yards it would of been a great subs and 3 points.

covcity4life · Mar 11, 2015

the german chance was the only clear cut one when we went 424

i want pressley back

italiahorse · Mar 11, 2015

coop said:
If prosdick had of scored from 5 yards it would of been a great subs and 3 points.

But he missed and it's irrelevant.
When he came on we effectively went down to 10 men.
He can't head and obviously he can't shoot straight.
I want to know who got him in and why ?

rupert_bear · Mar 11, 2015

italiahorse said:
Mowbray
I want to know who got him in and why ?

Well it wasn't Steven Pressley or Tony Mowbray, one had been sacked the other yet to be appointed !

Nick · Mar 11, 2015

I did like how we had 3 players stood on the half way line rather than every one back. Just a shame it wasn't Jackson

no_loyalty · Mar 11, 2015

rupert_bear said:
Well it wasn't Steven Pressley or Tony Mowbray, one had been sacked the other yet to be appointed !

Was probably recommended to Waggott by a mate?

The sub change last night (1 Viewer)

The Lurker

Well-Known Member

Huckerby

Guest

stupot07

Well-Known Member

ccfctommy

Well-Known Member

Astute

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member

4waspsting

Active Member

4waspsting

Active Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

coop

Well-Known Member

covcity4life

Well-Known Member

italiahorse

Well-Known Member

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

The sub change last night (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Huckerby

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency