bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
Always someone else eh?
I think you will find that was ray ranson that the comment was aimed at. He is not a sisu employee. It was to do with a loan arrangement. McCarthy had the last laugh as ranson still signed the useless twat with McCarthy desperate not to let him go on loan first. We wasted at least £4 million on Eastwood - blame ranson.
Without being funny if the trust didn't exist would it make any difference?
I think you will find that was ray ranson that the comment was aimed at. He is not a sisu employee. It was to do with a loan arrangement. McCarthy had the last laugh as ranson still signed the useless twat with McCarthy desperate not to let him go on loan first. We wasted at least £4 million on Eastwood - blame ranson.
At least it's a voice with more weight than individuals. I'd like the Trust to be a lot more aggressive towards SISU now, because the club is close to dead to me in its current state.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The thing is, as soon as they are they'll be sent packing. There is nothing they can really do other than try to engage fans, which they are doing.
That's why I keep pushing the breakaway club. It's the only way to be rid of SISU.
There are arguments for and against it - but I'm at a point now where I don't have a club to support really; and want to finally get rid of the people who have put me in that position.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's why I keep pushing the breakaway club. It's the only way to be rid of SISU.
There are arguments for and against it - but I'm at a point now where I don't have a club to support really; and want to finally get rid of the people who have put me in that position.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm gonna sit back and enjoy you talking up this revolution that you're pushing, yet not actually doing anything.
I can assure you that even after the recent letter it's our intention to continue dialogue with TIm Fisher, Mark Labovitch and with Joy Seppala if we are ever given the opportunity.
Some of us have met with TF and ML as part of the SCG group and I am confident they know our views and principles. At the same time we are also keen to carry on meeting with ACL, CCC and the FL as any sort of open negotiations might help our supporters see an end to our plight.
Actually the SCG did not meet Joy
Kingharvest who is apart of the SCG said he did.
Always someone else eh?
How do you know what other people are and are not doing?
Also, what is your brilliant idea for sorting this mess out? That's all it is - an idea to be discussed. Putting forward an idea doesn't really warrant people being complete tools in response now does it?
I imagine your 'brilliant idea' is do nothing and watch the club die.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Your posts are lame Nick. You shoot down anyone who wants to fix this mess - and unbelievably you're trusted to moderate a fans forum.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He's not trusted he's like SISU! He set up and owns the forum for people like you to air your views, boo NICK OUT, NICK OUT, NICK OUT.
If you want Nick out you need to do nothing - that's the way forward.
If there's something worth fighting for - don't.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kingharvest who is apart of the SCG said he did.
You're correct but thats my point one member of the Scg met her and two others who are not on the Scg what about other representatives of the Scg including representatives of the largest supporters group on the Scg were they invited:thinking about:No they weren't. So we'll have a cosy meeting with people wh represent just a few people especially if they attend Sixfields but we wont talk to the Trust:claping hands::facepalm:
You're correct but thats my point one member of the Scg met her and two others who are not on the Scg what about other representatives of the Scg including representatives of the largest supporters group on the Scg were they invited:thinking about:No they weren't. So we'll have a cosy meeting with people wh represent just a few people especially if they attend Sixfields but we wont talk to the Trust:claping hands::facepalm:
If it's none of my business then I will keep out of it.
I would have thought as it's Coventry City and you support that team then it's very much your business.
Oh well - I don't want to argue about it. We've all got our opinions. I just don't want this situation to continue.
I do act on the things I suggest. Whether this comes to anything is another matter - but I'm discussing it in the background with others.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you surprised though that Joy Seppala won't talk to the Trust? After the Trust questioned the Golden Share being awarded to Otium and hyping up the Haskell bid to purchase the Club and the Ricoh?
Yet to top it all off they make a mockery statue of Joy Seppala outside the Ricoh!! If I was Joy I wouldn't want to talk to the Trust either, at ther least the SCG who maybe not be big in numbers have been professional in this situation and it's paid off, unless your stating Kingharvest is a liar?
Again you're missing the point it wasn't the Scg who met her it was one person from the Scg,The Trust are also on the Scg
So in other words you are moaning the trust didn't meet her? Probably something to do with drawing pictures of her as a pig etc etc.
Can't have it both ways surely?
Well I think we'll soon find out one way or another.
So for the trust to meet her it would need to be every member as just Steve wouldn't count?
People from the scg met her
Got to go am at work just one thing why didn't she meet with the Scg and not one person from it? Can't you see the point ffs?
No I'm a supporter, a follower. I do not tell Ford how to design their cars or where to sell them, but I still own one. I did not tell Taylor Wimpey how to build my house but I still bought it and I will not tell SISU how to run my club, but I will still support it!
Unusual stance. What do you think of the Hull name change situation with their fans?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?