Spot on. Not sure why it has suddenly become so fashionable to praise Sterling to the sky and proclaim anyone who doesn't agree doesn't know what he's on about but at the end of the day at some point missing chances is going to cost you.Yeah, I get all that and I am a big Sterling fan, but at international level you have to take your chances.
Yesterday we scored 2, but they were the only 2 we had on target.
Same here.Think I had a bet on Maguire to score first goal on SBT bookies - come on and update the system, I may have won a few quid for a change!
Think I had a bet on Maguire to score first goal on SBT bookies - come on and update the system, I may have won a few quid for a change!
Just checked. A whole 1,500 there to watch Trinidad & Tobago beat USA to knock USA out...Panama (how the hell did they manage to get to the WC?!?)
Interesting to note, but slightly unfair on the Yanks having to play two teams at once.Just checked. A whole 1,500 there to watch Trinidad & Tobago beat USA to knock USA out...
Same here.
Have had a good run. I had Stones first scorer against Panama, Kane first scorer against Colombia, Maguire first scorer last night and also had England to win 2-0, Russia to draw and put a shed load on England simply winning.
33/1. Think I had 30 quid on him.What price did you get for Maguire?
Spot on. Not sure why it has suddenly become so fashionable to praise Sterling to the sky and proclaim anyone who doesn't agree doesn't know what he's on about but at the end of the day at some point missing chances is going to cost you.
Of course there are other things he does well but we'd be going nuts if Biamou was missing those chances, Sterling is a £50m player, putting away at least one of them shouldn't be beyond him.
Southgate isn't going to change the team now though, who would? We're in a World Cup semi.
Well that's it. He surely knows his finishing is poor. That has to form part of his mindset.If Sterling would pass to a better positioned player instead of being selfish,he would be a world beater and England would definitely win the World Cup.If he continues to be greedy we may come to regret his inclusion.
Regards.
same mistake too many made - confusing "team" with a side lacking star names.I thought this was the worst England team you could remember?
Well that's it. He surely knows his finishing is poor. That has to form part of his mindset.
At Man City he gets loads of chances set up on a plate for him from just a few yards out.
For England he has to realise he is much less likely to get that and he should adjust his game accordingly and lay the ball off for others more often instead of taking the chance on and missing.
Care to expand?That’s unfair on Sterling. He plays in a different role at Man City and even Sané struggled in the German setup — international football is played a lot deeper so players in that mould get less chances all together.
Yesterday, Sterling was our most threatening player, his pace constantly put Sweden on the back foot and forced throw-ins, corners and freekicks from nothing over this campaign. I was reading some stats after the Colombia game, and we have far less completed dribbles per game than France, Belgium, Brazil and Sterling was by far ahead for us. Take him out of the team, and no one is carrying the ball. Coincidently, our main strength is set plays (by far the best in the competition) and one thing Kane and Sterling have done very well is drawing fouls so we can put Stones and Maguire up in the opposition box. A goal would have topped things off for Sterling, but yesterday was a vindication for Southgate in keeping faith in Alli and Sterling. The more reliable pundits have praised Sterling for his performance.
To put this example into a Cov perspective, Bayliss was such a revelation for us because he carried the ball, something that was missing in our team after Jones got injured. You have to have at least one main dribbler in your team.
Back to England, we need to create more chances for Kane though. Before the Sweden game, he averaged 3 shots a game (including penalties) and his Spurs average is 5 shots each game. He is our match winner and frankly, to stand a chance in the final (if we get there) we’ll probably need him to score.
As I have said a number of times, I am a fan of Sterling.That’s unfair on Sterling. He plays in a different role at Man City and even Sané struggled in the German setup — international football is played a lot deeper so players in that mould get less chances all together.
Yesterday, Sterling was our most threatening player, his pace constantly put Sweden on the back foot and forced throw-ins, corners and freekicks from nothing over this campaign. I was reading some stats after the Colombia game, and we have far less completed dribbles per game than France, Belgium, Brazil and Sterling was by far ahead for us. Take him out of the team, and no one is carrying the ball. Coincidently, our main strength is set plays (by far the best in the competition) and one thing Kane and Sterling have done very well is drawing fouls so we can put Stones and Maguire up in the opposition box. A goal would have topped things off for Sterling, but yesterday was a vindication for Southgate in keeping faith in Alli and Sterling. The more reliable pundits have praised Sterling for his performance.
To put this example into a Cov perspective, Bayliss was such a revelation for us because he carried the ball, something that was missing in our team after Jones got injured. You have to have at least one main dribbler in your team.
Back to England, we need to create more chances for Kane though. Before the Sweden game, he averaged 3 shots a game (including penalties) and his Spurs average is 5 shots each game. He is our match winner and frankly, to stand a chance in the final (if we get there) we’ll probably need him to score.
If Sterling would pass to a better positioned player instead of being selfish,he would be a world beater and England would definitely win the World Cup.If he continues to be greedy we may come to regret his inclusion.
Regards.
As I have said a number of times, I am a fan of Sterling.
He has to score or set up others to score though, it really is that simple.
He was a constant threat to Sweden last night, but there was no end product.
There was plenty of end product as his pace pulled the defence apart on numerous occasions- he won corners free kicks and his pace created a lot of issues and space for others.
Hmm, and what about when Biamou was doing the same, but not scoring?There was plenty of end product as his pace pulled the defence apart on numerous occasions- he won corners free kicks and his pace created a lot of issues and space for others.
As I have said a number of times, I am a fan of Sterling.
He has to score or set up others to score though, it really is that simple.
He was a constant threat to Sweden last night, but there was no end product.
Hmm, and what about when Biamou was doing the same, but not scoring?
Biamou was clearly making space for others and was pulling defences about with his running and making a nuisance of himself.
How come with him it was only about the goals? You just kept putting up his goal stats endlessly all season.
I am a fan of Sterling, but at international level you have to take your chances.
Care to expand?
You were calling for him to be dropped the other day weren't you?
Hmm, and what about when Biamou was doing the same, but not scoring?
Biamou was clearly making space for others and was pulling defences about with his running and making a nuisance of himself.
How come with him it was only about the goals? You just kept putting up his goal stats endlessly all season.
I am a fan of Sterling, but at international level you have to take your chances.
He was. There was definitely a case for dropping him after the Colombia game, rather less so after Sweden. There's an argument I suppose you start with someone else and bring Sterling on when they tire to run at them, but Rashford and Vardy seem to be Southgate's choices as impact subs in that respect.Yes but you can’t deny he was effective yesterday
That's fine, you've selected your scapegoat already if we don't win it. And if we do win, it will be despite Sterling...
I'm screaming at the tv shouting 'how do you miss that!' as much as anyone, but that's ignoring what he brings to the side. He set up Kane's chance (which he should have scored from) and made the chances he missed by making great runs.
Why do you think Sweden (qualified ahead of Netherlands, beat Italy in the playoff, topped a group including Germany and Mexico) looked 'rubbish'? Maybe it was because they couldn't keep their nice rigid 4-4-2 formation and were scared of our pace.
I'm sure you know more than Pep, Gareth and Domenech though...
3 ex-international defenders 'blindly defending him'...:emoji_joy:
They finished above Netherlands in their WC qualifying group, beat France 2-1, knocked out Italy in their WC play-off and of course finished above Germany in their group.
So not exactly rubbish.
Credit England for making them look distinctly average.
I agree with the Biamou points because goals aren’t necessarily the be all and end all.
Much like when Rashford missed a clear 1v1 with plenty of time and space? For Sterling’s chance, it was good goalkeeping and recovery defence. Should’ve done better, but his options were cut off very quickly — it wasn’t as easy as it looks, 100%.
If you look back at the thread, you will see Wingy was saying to take him off at half time and I was saying leave him on because he was a real threat to the Swedish defence.Yes but you can’t deny he was effective yesterday
Who said I was comparing the two on speed?Biamou has zero pace to compare the two is absurd
What about the other eleventy billion chances he has missed?
I sometimes wonder if Sterling committed a murder if people would still defend him. He has been the disappointment of the tournament (hardly a shock) yet gets away with it because he makes good runs.
'Them' being international football people with I'd guess over 1000 top flight games of experience or you? Erm.Take sides with them if you want, but it is a bit desperate.
He has been atrocious given he is supposed to be a 'star man'. You need to drop the love-in.
If sterling didn't get the silly abuse in the media before then people wouldn't be trying too hard now'Them' being international football people with I'd guess over 1000 top flight games of experience or you? Erm.
My view of Henderson has changed completely in this tournament and fair play to him. What would it take for you to be man enough to do the same with Sterling?...
'Them' being international football people with I'd guess over 1000 top flight games of experience or you? Erm.
My view of Henderson has changed completely in this tournament and fair play to him. What would it take for you to be man enough to do the same with Sterling?...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?